Convince me that Mullen is the right guy for the job. Tell me why he is a good head coach
and MSU should be lucky to have him.
and MSU should be lucky to have him.
Goat Grindin said:<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; ">then you look even deeper. You look at the shape the program was in when the coach was hired. You also have to look at the competition.<div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; "><br style="min-width: 0px; "></div><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; ">MSU is a perennially losing program. Croom left us in below average condition.<br style="min-width: 0px; "><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; "><br style="min-width: 0px; "></div><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; ">In the end, Mullen is 17-15 so far in his first three years. Jackie Sherrill, the best coach in MSU history, was 16-14 at this point in October 1993 in his third year. He inherited a pretty good situation with two back to back 5-6 teams with alot of talent that Rockey had recruited. Mullen used Croom's so-so recruits and have them playing at a higher level than anyone ever dreamed. Mullen's also doing a few things better than Jackie did. QB is one of them. Team chemistry is another. Jackie broke out in 1994 with an 8-3 regular season. I expect the same from Mullen. And Mullen actually won a bowl game, which Jackie had trouble with. We had the hardest schedule in the country in 2009.</div></div><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; "><br style="min-width: 0px; "></div><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; ">And look, even comparing Mullen to Jackie is a big compliment in itself. And Mullen is doing this in the hardest SEC and SEC West in history. Every year he's been coach an SEC West has won a National Championship and will probably again this year. Last year two SEC West teams played in BCS bowl games. In 2009 Florida did the same. </div><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; "><br style="min-width: 0px; "></div><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; ">He was OC for a National Championship Florida team.</div><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; "><br style="min-width: 0px; "></div><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; ">He's a good evaluator of under the radar talent.</div><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; "><br style="min-width: 0px; "></div><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; ">He's consistent. Like I've said 10 times already, he beats the teams he's supposed to beat and doesn't drop games to Louisiana Tech.</div><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; "><br style="min-width: 0px; "></div><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; ">I'm looking forward to your slant on these facts. Since they are facts that back up Mullen being a good coach, it's really hard to argue with them.</div><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; "><br style="min-width: 0px; "></div><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; ">Now for my personal opinion. I see these 2* guys that nobody recruited actually turning into good football players. We look like a football team and look well coached. I look at most of the playcalling and decisions as pretty solid. Most of them are good while some are bad. I'll take that. I think Mullen is a FANTASTIC football coach. Make of it what you will.</div><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; ">
</div><div style="min-width: 0px; max-width: 99%; ">Not to mention that he's mentioned with every job opening that comes up. He's in high demand.</div><div>
</div></div></span>
I always do that crap. Tyler Russell.Bobby Ricigliano said:asdf
I don't think these type of discussions are pointless when we keep it civil. You and Goat gave your opinion and while I might not totally agree, I respect that you did give an opinion. And I think you could change my perception, you didn't in this case, but you could.Incognegro said:you want my contribution, here you go...<div>
</div><div>What I've been able to notice on this board is that the fanbase is splitting into 3 different factions. Those that strive for mediocrity, those that expect to win now, and those that have a realistic approach. As far as Goat is concerned, I can't give a whole hearted opinion as to which group he falls under, but his post was far from a loser mentality as it was looking at Mullen's circumstances from a realistic approach.</div><div>
</div><div>You cannot overstate just how bad of shape this program was after Croom left and has been for many years past. I don't care if we had Saban here, I don't see the results being any different than what they were. 2009 was Mullen's first year and we barely was under .500 with the hardest schedule in the country and then takes us to the Gator bowl with an 8-4 record in the hardest division in all of college football. We have a bigger drop off in our starting line up when we lose 2 players off of our o line and 6 total players on our defense and 3 of those players went to the draft. Not only that, but we loser our defensive coordinator and wide receivers coach as well.</div><div>
</div><div>It's not a loser's mentality to understand that with how we're playing given the circumstances is better than what we would be doing currently had we gotten another coach other than Mullen. What I consider a losers mentality is people saying that as fans we should be ecstatic with continued 6-6 and 7-5 records with theoccasional8 or 9 win seasons and never expect us to make it to the BCS. What Goat said was nothing of that sort.</div><div>
</div><div>I don't care if you agree with me or not, but asking people to change your perception is fruitless when you know good and well no one can say anything to change your mind.</div><div>
</div><div>Those are my thoughts... you're welcome...</div>
You always know when you get under someones skin when they resort to name calling. And you called me a "bigot", lmao.Incognegro said:go ahead and continue acting like your opinion is more important than everyone else you 17n bigot. let's see how many "discussions" you'll have.