Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Log in
Register
Message Boards
Rivals300
Recruiting Board
NIL Valuation
Transfer Portal
Andy & Ari On3
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
5 storylines to track at Big Ten Media Days: Michigan punishment, playoff format debate, Julian Sayin & more
Heisman Trophy Dark Horses: Under-the-radar candidates for 2025
Lincoln Riley reflects on Mike Leach’s College Football Hall of Fame eligibility
Jimbo Fisher to join ACC Network as studio analyst
Jim Phillips addresses new ACC policy on field, court storming in 2025
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Could the P12(10) be more secure than the B12?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 132093656" data-attributes="member: 1428007"><p>Laughable claim of the day "there is no financial incentive for Pac schools to join the BIG 12".</p><p></p><p>First--the BIG 12 is not at the negotiating table yet, but what we do know is that ALL projections show that the BIG 12 is going to be ahead of the PAC--which has already been lowballed and is going to have to go to open market to try to get any deal. And these aren't message board posters, they are the people in the industry who valuate conferences ahead of their media rights negotiations.</p><p></p><p>On top of that, the BIG 12 is FAR more likely to participate in playoffs and major bowls than the PAC is.</p><p></p><p>Sure the PAC is pumping out propaganda left and right to try to hold the few schools that want to remain there there. But real viewing numbers, fan numbers, athletic success--everything that matters shows the BIG 12 to be ahead.</p><p></p><p>Now who knows if the PAC schools are going to just hold on to wait for Oregon, Stanford, Washington to also leave. Who knows if they'll be happy to fork over revenues to those schools just to get them to sign for a couple of years instead of blowing up right now.</p><p></p><p>But to claim there isn't a financial incentive reminds one of the lies the ACC told FSU and Clemson to keep them in that severely underpaid conference which is waiting to blow up? Just a bogus claim with nothing to back it up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buckaineer, post: 132093656, member: 1428007"] Laughable claim of the day "there is no financial incentive for Pac schools to join the BIG 12". First--the BIG 12 is not at the negotiating table yet, but what we do know is that ALL projections show that the BIG 12 is going to be ahead of the PAC--which has already been lowballed and is going to have to go to open market to try to get any deal. And these aren't message board posters, they are the people in the industry who valuate conferences ahead of their media rights negotiations. On top of that, the BIG 12 is FAR more likely to participate in playoffs and major bowls than the PAC is. Sure the PAC is pumping out propaganda left and right to try to hold the few schools that want to remain there there. But real viewing numbers, fan numbers, athletic success--everything that matters shows the BIG 12 to be ahead. Now who knows if the PAC schools are going to just hold on to wait for Oregon, Stanford, Washington to also leave. Who knows if they'll be happy to fork over revenues to those schools just to get them to sign for a couple of years instead of blowing up right now. But to claim there isn't a financial incentive reminds one of the lies the ACC told FSU and Clemson to keep them in that severely underpaid conference which is waiting to blow up? Just a bogus claim with nothing to back it up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Could the P12(10) be more secure than the B12?
Top
Bottom