Lol, Jameslee still posting lies. Ivermectin has been approved for Covid treatment in 79 countries and was the sole reason that India's most populous city (and a very low vax rate) basically eradicated Covid.
I would love ANY of the Coronobros to explain how India is only 123rd in the world in deaths per million population... while only being 5% vaxxed?Lol, Jameslee still posting lies. Ivermectin has been approved for Covid treatment in 79 countries and was the sole reason that India's most populous city (and a very low vax rate) basically eradicated Covid.
About half of this year's deaths occurred in the first two months of the year, in the big winter wave that rose up before we were vaccinating. January 2021 was the worst month of deaths in the entire pandemic. As of February 1, only about 2% of seniors were fully vaccinated. We didn't even hit 50% of seniors fully vaccinated until end of March, when that wave was over. We had a lot more deaths before mass vaccination that we've had since, and the deaths that have occurred since have been predominantly in the people still unvaccinated. Vaccines have absolutely helped. You just have to actually go look at the data with an open mind rather than listening uncritically to propaganda.This is the bizarre part: more people have now died in 2021 WITH A VAXX than in 2020 WITHOUT A VAXX.
So... the vaxx helped... how????
Ok, So who is making the call on what is considered "Credible" How is "level of credibility" (low, medium, etc.) determined? Are they relying on Snopes "fact checkers"? LOL.
CNN isn't just "left biased" it can be classified as extreme left just as OANN is getting the "extreme right" label. Some could challenge the "extreme right" label of Newsmax.
Oh yeah. Google bad. I forgot.Did you read under their funding that a major source of their revenue is from GOOGLE ADSENSE"
If you want accurate Covid news, you ABSOLUTELY have to go to Oann and Newsmax or someone outside the US like Reuters, etc.
Scientist and doctors just like everyone else with high paying jobs want to keep their jobs. Just like with global warming these people are just following the money.Several observations.
- If you go to Google and search on anything about COVID, and then go to an unfiltered search engine and do the same you get drastically different results. That's very scary to me.
- There are drastically different levels of risk of death from COVID between my 13 year old daughter and my 82 year old father. For the government to look at them both equally and dictate they both are REQUIRED to get it is treasonous in my opinion.
- My father almost died from the vaccine. He had 2 strokes in succession after the vaccine and was ultimately completely cleared of any potential risk for another one (full body angiography which show no plaque or clotting) but was put on blood thinners because "the vaccine does have a tendency to cause clotting" per the cardiologist. My issue isn't that it almost killed him or that it wasn't hardly even acknowledged until after he had his second stroke for absolutely no reason. My issue is that even after all of that we were never offered a yellow card to log it against the vaccine. So even when a Dr has done everything they can to blame it on something else, but they can't find anything else and have to admit it was the vaccine, they still don't offer or log it against the vaccine so we have data to better understand the side effects. That's a huge issue as well.
- Decisions in the US are being made by a very small group of people that are turning a blind eye to studies around the world that are showing that there are other ways to approach or attack the virus without vaccine which also points to ulterior motives.
If you don't see these as reasons to challenge the need for the vaccine you are the definition of a sheep.
CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, NPR, and some others are all far left leaning mouth pieces who stay afloat with outside assistance otherwise they would have already gone under.Ok, So who is making the call on what is considered "Credible" How is "level of credibility" (low, medium, etc.) determined? Are they relying on Snopes "fact checkers"? LOL.
CNN isn't just "left biased" it can be classified as extreme left just as OANN is getting the "extreme right" label. Some could challenge the "extreme right" label of Newsmax.
So a controlled source of revenue targeted to a specific goal or audience.Did you read under their funding that a major source of their revenue is from GOOGLE ADSENSE"
People. Strawman.Come on James you’re better than this. Name any holiday and make it every day, people will be sick of it in a week.
NEws flash, every search engine is going to return different results. They use different algorithms to produce results and scrub the internet for data. They track your web activity differently. Goggle will especially cater results based on your web history, particularly if you have a Google account. The more you use one search engine, the more likely it is to present more customized results as it learns more of your behavior on their site.Several observations.
- If you go to Google and search on anything about COVID, and then go to an unfiltered search engine and do the same you get drastically different results. That's very scary to me.
Ok, So who is making the call on what is considered "Credible" How is "level of credibility" (low, medium, etc.) determined? Are they relying on Snopes "fact checkers"? LOL.
CNN isn't just "left biased" it can be classified as extreme left just as OANN is getting the "extreme right" label. Some could challenge the "extreme right" label of Newsmax.
As is the case for a large number of websites. Basically all you got to do is place the code on your website for Google Adsense to run ads on your website and boom you're making money from Google Adsense.Did you read under their funding that a major source of their revenue is from GOOGLE ADSENSE"
You mean how like OANN is almost entirely funded by AT&T?CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, NPR, and some others are all far left leaning mouth pieces who stay afloat with outside assistance otherwise they would have already gone under.
You missed the point but I am not surprised.You mean how like OANN is almost entirely funded by AT&T?
As I also said, compare the differences what is returned and how it’s slanted. And way to ignore all other points made. Very typical to choose one thing to pick on, but ignore other points that are valid.NEws flash, every search engine is going to return different results. They use different algorithms to produce results and scrub the internet for data. They track your web activity differently. Goggle will especially cater results based on your web history, particularly if you have a Google account. The more you use one search engine, the more likely it is to present more customized results as it learns more of your behavior on their site.
Exactly.As I also said, compare the differences what is returned and how it’s slanted. And way to ignore all other points made. Very typical to choose one thing to pick on, but ignore other points that are valid.
Sorry to break your fragile ego, but I didn’t care enough to comment about the rest. Your not that important.As I also said, compare the differences what is returned and how it’s slanted. And way to ignore all other points made. Very typical to choose one thing to pick on, but ignore other points that are valid.
So you don’t have any logical comeback. Got it. Keep you’re head in the sand big guy.Sorry to break your fragile ego, but I didn’t care enough to comment about the rest. Your not that important.
These people are strait up lemmings and dumber than a box or rocks. It's incredible.Lol, new Merck pill is a rip off of ivermectin. Of course that's how you get Covid bros to buy into ivermectin. Just tweek it and relabel at as a new Covid pill
Pharma is the new religion
Lol, new Merck pill is a rip off of ivermectin. Of course that's how you get Covid bros to buy into ivermectin. Just tweek it and relabel at as a new Covid pill
Pharma is the new religion
I'm curious what makes you say this. What similarities are there in the two drugs? Because it appears there are no similarities in their mode of synthesis, their chemical structures, or their mechanism of actions.
Also, are you even sure you're connecting the right conspiracy theory to the right drug? Because I heard the exact same conspiracy theory just the other day on this same forum (untrue in this case as well) about the Pfizer pill (ritonavir, an an antiviral used to treat HIV) as about this Merck pill (molnupiravir, and antiviral developed initially to treat flu).
forgive us if we don't take your word for it. You have to bring proof. Just saying it is doesn't make it so.Lol, it's ivermectin relabeled.
forgive us if we don't take your word for it. You have to bring proof. Just saying it is doesn't make it so.