Good lord, its like we went back in time 6 years with this frustratingly simplistic question.
Below is an honest rundown of mask effectiveness, based on countless governmental and private health studies released this decade.
Fun fact- this information is readily available to you through your favorite search engine.
- High proper use of proper masks helped to measurably reduce infection in some instances.
- High proper use of proper masks did not measurably reduce infection in some instances.
- Low proper use of proper masks did not measurably reduce infection in some instances.
- Low improper use of proper masks did not measurably reduce infection in most instances.
- Low use of proper masks did not measurably reduce infection in most instances.
It was an easy low impact/low effort way to make life a little safer for people with crappier immune systems (elders, cancer treatment patients, etc.). This was an easy thing to do and expect it help at a MICRO level. Wasn't going to "beat" Covid but it might save the old lady's life that needed to get out to buy groceries or go to drug store. Or keep a healthy adult from taking it home to their sick child. That's worth the mild inconvenience for most people and still bizarre to me that so many freaked out about it. It was like empathy and baseline self-preservation was viewed as being weak or compliant. Humans are weird.
If we should be mad at the government/health experts/media, it should be over messaging and implying humans had real control of the pandemic at the MACRO level and could beat it in a manageable time frame. 2 things come to mind:
1) Remember 15 days to slow the spread? Yeah you can slow it (and save some old people and sick kids) but the 15 days gives false expectations of true control. When we didn't get past it early on, people understandably got very frustrated and checked out of listening.
2) implying a vaccine for a coronavirus (same family as colds) would work the same as a polio vaccine. There's a reason we don't have a common cold vaccine and a reason why something like influenza can't be controlled the same way as polio or measles can. This too gave false expectations of a knock out solution. I fell for this one.
The expert crowd would have been far better off swallowing their ego and pride by acknowledging the limitations that humans have in pandemics of a novel virus. Be honest and admit that you can only soften the blow and you really don't know what a novel virus is going to do. Don't imply you can fix it and under some time frame. Basically, don't imply "this for that". When "that" didn't happen, you lose legitimacy and gives the "it's not real" and "masks don't do anything at all" people the room they need to make the situation worse than it needed to be.