current events thread

BigWill

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2001
52,137
30,968
113
Trump’s approval rating is poor right now and a few recent surveys (Gallup and Pew) have it looking terrible.

Considering he hasn’t done much offensive, this seems a function of policy decisions particularly tariffs.

Panic hasn’t set in among GOP electeds because that isn’t allowed. But it’s coming because the numbers stink.

Also Dems are super unpopular right now too. But as we’ve learned in the past, that doesn’t much matter for the out party in a midterm.
Usual "elite" thinkers here.
 

BigWill

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2001
52,137
30,968
113
I have watched various hikers posting from The Appalachian Trail from Georgia to Maine or The Pacific Coast Trail from the Southern US to the Northern US borders and NO I don't feel that the VAST majority are anything but semi crazy with 3 - 6 months to take a long walk !
 

Semi-elite R2R athlete

Well-known member
Sep 13, 2008
3,815
9,022
113
I have watched various hikers posting from The Appalachian Trail from Georgia to Maine or The Pacific Coast Trail from the Southern US to the Northern US borders and NO I don't feel that the VAST majority are anything but semi crazy with 3 - 6 months to take a long walk !
I agree!

What if I told you I walked the Grand Canyon R2R trail at a slightly above average pace? Would that make me a semi-elite athlete?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bung23

rillaman

Well-known member
May 10, 2009
18,134
11,483
113
Conservation works.


Your timing with this stuff is odd. Spiking the football again while huge fires are burning.

I think the # of acres burned is more significant than the # of fires.

All of Colorado’s largest fires have occurred in the last 25 years. Sure seems like we have more massive fires than we used to. Just as we have more hot days than we used to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JeffT819

rillaman

Well-known member
May 10, 2009
18,134
11,483
113

Denver 90 degree days during 10 year span from 1924-1933 - 211
Denver 90 degree days during 10 year span from 2014-2023 - 527

Look, both parties are lost when it comes to climate change. Dems just want to focus on oil. The GOP wants people to believe we have limited to no impact.

How many people has Denver added in the last 100 years? How many buildings, how much concrete? How many natural areas have been replaced with roads and housing? How much fresh water is being used?

Those are questions that scientists, who are not beholden to either party, have about the change in weather/climate.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JeffT819

Uncoach

Well-known member
Dec 8, 2011
6,095
8,317
113

Denver 90 degree days during 10 year span from 1924-1933 - 211
Denver 90 degree days during 10 year span from 2014-2023 - 527

Look, both parties are lost when it comes to climate change. Dems just want to focus on oil. The GOP wants people to believe we have limited to no impact.

How many people has Denver added in the last 100 years? How many buildings, how much concrete? How many natural areas have been replaced with roads and housing? How much fresh water is being used?

Those are questions that scientists, who are not beholden to either party, have about the change in weather/climate.
Your locality has absolutely nothing to do with climate change. It’s called “Global Warming”, not “Denver Warming”. How is Denver’s warming creating more polar ice?
 

Uncoach

Well-known member
Dec 8, 2011
6,095
8,317
113
Your timing with this stuff is odd. Spiking the football again while huge fires are burning.

I think the # of acres burned is more significant than the # of fires.

All of Colorado’s largest fires have occurred in the last 25 years. Sure seems like we have more massive fires than we used to. Just as we have more hot days than we used to.
Conservation works. You obviously whiffed on the word “fuel” in the article. The huge fires are harder to contain because of the lack of forestry maintenance, which the radical enviro groups have been against for 40+ years now. As off as you are about conservation wrt forestry, you’re even further off with how climate change works. It isn’t local.
 

rillaman

Well-known member
May 10, 2009
18,134
11,483
113
Your locality has absolutely nothing to do with climate change. It’s called “Global Warming”, not “Denver Warming”. How is Denver’s warming creating more polar ice?

Anyone with an ounce of curiosity and research has known than certain areas are being impacted more than others.

I could do this for many other cities and give you similar results. Salt Lake City is another with similar changes.

Do you really think humans are having no impact?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JeffT819

rillaman

Well-known member
May 10, 2009
18,134
11,483
113
Conservation works. You obviously whiffed on the word “fuel” in the article. The huge fires are harder to contain because of the lack of forestry maintenance, which the radical enviro groups have been against for 40+ years now. As off as you are about conservation wrt forestry, you’re even further off with how climate change works. It isn’t local.

And because summers are longer and hotter than they used to be. Conveniently left out that massive variable.

Colorado does a ton of forest management. Manages it much more than 100 years ago. Unfortunately, the summers are longer and hotter than they used to be.

I graduated with a degree in Natural Resource Management, but ya, I have no idea what I’m talking about.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JeffT819

BigWill

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2001
52,137
30,968
113
Anyone with an ounce of curiosity and research has known than certain areas are being impacted more than others.

I could do this for many other cities and give you similar results. Salt Lake City is another with similar changes.

Do you really think humans are having no impact?
Anyone too unthinking to not vote, shouldn't be thinking he is a scholar.
 

tjfleck6

Well-known member
Apr 19, 2008
5,875
6,810
113
Conservation works. You obviously whiffed on the word “fuel” in the article. The huge fires are harder to contain because of the lack of forestry maintenance, which the radical enviro groups have been against for 40+ years now. As off as you are about conservation wrt forestry, you’re even further off with how climate change works. It isn’t local.
Rill is just a complete whack job like Jeff now.

1936 is the year for HOT! Gee whiz, a study says that urban heat islands raise the floor by 9 full degrees. I can attest having a convertible and noting the dramatic cooling that occurs when driving by a farm after sunset. It is almost desert like pleasant after dark.

I wonder why cities like Denver and Phoenix set records more often with a higher noise floor?

Colorado fires? When was Colorado last a red state? One R governor since 1975. There is your answer Rilly
 

tjfleck6

Well-known member
Apr 19, 2008
5,875
6,810
113
Rilly - you are silly little compliant man.













derangement won’t allow Mr Curious to read this study.



Too bad you showed so little curiosity and took the vax because Trump and Biden told you it was good for you.
 

Semi-elite R2R athlete

Well-known member
Sep 13, 2008
3,815
9,022
113
No, just too cheap to rent a donkey that walk the trails.

Mary Anne and I once took a chopper flight from Vegas to over the GC.

She wasn't pleased to be on the chopper !
So what you’re saying is calling myself a “semi-elite athlete” even though I haven’t accomplished anything athletically except a slightly above average hike might be kind of crazy?

Should I be criticizing other folks’ accomplishments?
 

BigWill

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2001
52,137
30,968
113
Just pay for the donkey rides.

I stand corrected ! They aren't donkeys, they are Mules !

I am not country enough to know the difference !

Use that $ 1,000 that you keep waving around !

They can be rented for about $ 200 an hour.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: bung23

rillaman

Well-known member
May 10, 2009
18,134
11,483
113
Rilly - you are silly little compliant man.













derangement won’t allow Mr Curious to read this study.



Too bad you showed so little curiosity and took the vax because Trump and Biden told you it was good for you.




I'm sure the Europeans that are experiencing back to back record breakers are very concerned about the summer of 1540.
 

rillaman

Well-known member
May 10, 2009
18,134
11,483
113
Rill is just a complete whack job like Jeff now.

1936 is the year for HOT! Gee whiz, a study says that urban heat islands raise the floor by 9 full degrees. I can attest having a convertible and noting the dramatic cooling that occurs when driving by a farm after sunset. It is almost desert like pleasant after dark.

I wonder why cities like Denver and Phoenix set records more often with a higher noise floor?


Colorado fires? When was Colorado last a red state? One R governor since 1975. There is your answer Rilly

So humans have an impact on the temperature? Interesting. That's exactly what I have been saying, and that it has little to do with oil. Did you miss my comments about more humans/concrete, and less natural areas/water?
 
Last edited:

rillaman

Well-known member
May 10, 2009
18,134
11,483
113
Your locality has absolutely nothing to do with climate change. It’s called “Global Warming”, not “Denver Warming”. How is Denver’s warming creating more polar ice?

Are you under the impression that humans impact on the planet is felt equally across the globe? That continents with hundreds of millions of people will have the exact same experience as the poles where no people live?

As I said, both parties talk about things that don’t matter much, while ignoring reality. We need some elementary level education on this stuff.

Places with huge human populations are getting warmer. Places without humans are not. There is something to be learned here, but I’m not optimistic people can see it.
 

ILisBest

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
7,001
4,565
113



Look, both parties are lost when it comes to climate change. Dems just want to focus on oil. The GOP wants people to believe we have limited to no impact.
Ya, put me in the latter. Once "global warming, er..climate Change" started being the reason to move major amounts of wealth around the globe, I became more circumspect.

Just a couple of major eyebrow raisers:

Changing the name to encompass any environmental irregularity is very convenient.
The left's specific climate predictions have been mostly wrong for literally decades.
Any excuse leaders use to funnel major money around while denouncing any dessent as evil is a tell to me.

I would assume humans have an impact and we have a chance to slow fires specifically by forrest management. I believe the article you posted showed over 60% of Colorado's Forrests are still in need of maintenance. I think people would question the left's motives less if this is where they spent their efforts, but it is not. The left showed how little they care about Mother Earth when they cut sharper than Barry Sanders on Tesla.
 
Last edited:

BigWill

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2001
52,137
30,968
113
Today in the Hudson Valley, West of West Point, it is a fiery climate event with current temperature of 68o F.
 

rillaman

Well-known member
May 10, 2009
18,134
11,483
113
Rill is just a complete whack job like Jeff now.

1936 is the year for HOT! Gee whiz, a study says that urban heat islands raise the floor by 9 full degrees. I can attest having a convertible and noting the dramatic cooling that occurs when driving by a farm after sunset. It is almost desert like pleasant after dark.

I wonder why cities like Denver and Phoenix set records more often with a higher noise floor?

Colorado fires? When was Colorado last a red state? One R governor since 1975. There is your answer Rilly



States like Texas are also seeing an increase in the intensity of wildfires. Not as simple as R vs D. I know this goes against your us vs them philosophy, but facts do still matter.
 
Last edited: