Off topic Current events thread

bucshon

Senior
Staff member
May 10, 2017
1,146
881
113
The studies also say the impact is more likely with 28 days of steady use. Everyone says Tylenol is the safest pain med to take during pregnancy but that you should use it sparingly. Not using it when you have a fever poses a much bigger risk to the fetus than not taking anything at all.

There are no conclusive studies because of the ethical issues associated with doing studies involving pregnant women / unborn children.
 

JeffT819

All-Conference
Dec 4, 2001
1,666
1,254
113
There are no conclusive studies because of the ethical issues associated with doing studies involving pregnant women / unborn children.
I am well aware having worked in health care for a large portion of my career. The tragedy will be if some women refuse to take Tylenol when they should and then have babies with birth defects that could have been prevented. Conventional medical wisdom is that Tylenol should only be used when necessary.
 

BigWill

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
52,398
31,166
113
FAS in very new in thoughts of causation for childhood health issues !

I can recall Mary Anne being late pregnancy 7+ months, sitting at the bar with a glass of wine, waiting for the bar to close and my bouncing shift to end. BUT NEVER more than 1 glass ! Her first child, 50 + years ago.

A friend married a woman that had 4 kids with him, in 6 years ! She was a big drinker and the last 2 kids are slow. # 3 of 4 would be set in an automatic swing machine for hours and do nothing, I mean nothing ! Mary Anne tried to get the Mother to get assistance, to no avail. 25 years have passed, he is still developmentally challenged !

Another Couple had 6 in 9 years, Mother has never drank alcohol or used excessive pills. All 6 are normal !

The first couple's other 3 kids are all Lawyers, does that prove my point or not ?
 

stoneaxe27

All-American
Sep 22, 2006
5,629
6,595
113
The makers of Tylenol even say not to buy/take their drug if you are pregnant. 🐑
They do not. All drugs have warnings listed on them. Find one that doesn't. Tylenol is safe if used as indicated and not counterindicated by the physician.
 

stoneaxe27

All-American
Sep 22, 2006
5,629
6,595
113
The researchers noted that while steps should be taken to limit acetaminophen use, the drug is important for treating pain and fever during pregnancy, which can also harm the developing fetus. High fever can raise the risk of neural tube defects and preterm birth. “We recommend judicious acetaminophen use—lowest effective dose, shortest duration—under medical guidance, tailored to individual risk-benefit assessments, rather than a broad limitation,” they wrote.
Me-Same limitation on the use of any drug during pregnancy.
 

rillaman

Heisman
May 10, 2009
18,141
11,570
113
I am well aware having worked in health care for a large portion of my career. The tragedy will be if some women refuse to take Tylenol when they should and then have babies with birth defects that could have been prevented. Conventional medical wisdom is that Tylenol should only be used when necessary.

This is a valid concern. I think they could have addressed this better and said that Tylenol should only be taken in serious situations where the doctor thinks the risk of not taking it is severe.

But it could also prevent other kids from being born with developmental issues. This is another risk/reward situation that we don't fully understand because it is impossible to test these things.

I think it's good this is being talked about. We still don't know what causes autism or other developmental issues, but this could be part of it. We know that ingesting pain killers can have side effects on adults, so it's likely that pain killers have an impact on fetuses and babies, too.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ILisBest

CptParlay

Heisman
Jan 8, 2008
21,052
10,101
113
I have my opinion of Charlie Kirk and his words said as his beliefs.

That his Wife can proclaim : "I forgive Him !" (the shooter) is something more powerful than the State can demonstrate.

Charlie was mainly self-educated on events and policies that shape much of what is now known as "debate" in much of the USA, which has evolved as screaming at each other !

But what he attempted to have were discussions with non-like thinking people and allow them to discourse and then calmly educate them to logically rethink reexamine their prior decisions/beliefs.

I have searched my memory of now historical world figures, like Ghandi, JFK, MLK Jr, FDR and then deeper and found Will Rogers !
Some of those I mentioned had reprehensible personal lives.

But to be known as a ; "I never met a person I didn't like !" is more fitting how to have The Eternal Maker, Judge either Charlie or Will !
To be honest, so much of the progressive left is only interested in giving lectures, not participating in debates. There is no marketplace of ideas for them. There is dogma. Anything other than full obedience to the dogma makes you a heretic, and they have their own Spanish Inquisition to deal with heretics.
 

djpc

All-American
Nov 2, 2001
16,028
6,944
93
...

I think it's good this is being talked about. We still don't know what causes autism or other developmental issues, but this could be part of it. We know that ingesting pain killers can have side effects on adults, so it's likely that pain killers have an issues on fetuses and babies, too.
This has nothing to do with MAGA or politics, but just this morning I was listening to a podcast on the autism epidemic, with a researcher/practitioner at Northwestern was discussing a growing body of evidence that cases where autism appears during development (i.e., the child develops normally for a short period of time before development halts and the child begins displaying spectrum symptoms), that imbalances in the gut, oral, and nasal microbiomes seem to be linked and possibly causal. Prenatal exposure to tylenol is linked to lower gut microbiome diversity, and microbiome imbalance. I'm not a medical professional so I can't weigh in on whether there are situations where the benefits outweigh the risks, or even how to quantify the risks, but as someone with a conservative temperament I would be inclined to steer clear of the risk were I in a relevant situation.
 

rillaman

Heisman
May 10, 2009
18,141
11,570
113
This has nothing to do with MAGA or politics, but just this morning I was listening to a podcast on the autism epidemic, with a researcher/practitioner at Northwestern was discussing a growing body of evidence that cases where autism appears during development (i.e., the child develops normally for a short period of time before development halts and the child begins displaying spectrum symptoms), that imbalances in the gut, oral, and nasal microbiomes seem to be linked and possibly causal. Prenatal exposure to tylenol is linked to lower gut microbiome diversity, and microbiome imbalance. I'm not a medical professional so I can't weigh in on whether there are situations where the benefits outweigh the risks, or even how to quantify the risks, but as someone with a conservative temperament I would be inclined to steer clear of the risk were I in a relevant situation.

I've read some stuff on this as well. It certainly seems like something that should be researched more, but this is one thing that is tough to do a study on.

My wife was very hesitant to take anything during her pregnancy and during breast feeding. She put her body through a lot but didn't want to take anything that could harm the baby. You shouldn't be taking Tylenol when you are pregnant to treat a sore back. A sore back is one of the things that women have to go through to have a baby. High fever, talk to your doctor, you probably need to take something. Sore back? Sorry, this is going to be uncomfortable, but regular pain medication brings risks to the baby.

I do understand Jeff's point that high fever can have a negative impact on the baby too, and that should be discussed. Again, saying not to take it unless absolutely necessary seems like the best advice.

I have a major problem with people who just want this conversation shut down, and act like the science is settled. It's clearly not settled.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bung23 and djpc

rillaman

Heisman
May 10, 2009
18,141
11,570
113
I think a lot of people are nervous about this conversation because it will make parents feel guilty, and they don't want to admit that something they ingested could have hurt their child's development. I understand that too. We all worry about things we do that could impact our kids long term.

But if we have no answers about the autism spectrum, and this is a possible cause, we should all be open to that discussion. I live in a suburb with a high density of kids. We know so many families with kids on the spectrum. I'm positive that some don't want to know that they could have caused it. But many others would like to research this, and we should try to find answers for those that want to have healthy/thriving babies in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bung23 and ILisBest

BigWill

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
52,398
31,166
113
I've read some stuff on this as well. It certainly seems like something that should be researched more, but this is one thing that is tough to do a study on.

My wife was very hesitant to take anything during her pregnancy and during breast feeding. She put her body through a lot but didn't want to take anything that could harm the baby. You shouldn't be taking Tylenol when you are pregnant to treat a sore back. A sore back is one of the things that women have to go through to have a baby. High fever, talk to your doctor, you probably need to take something. Sore back? Sorry, this is going to be uncomfortable, but regular pain medication brings risks to the baby.

I do understand Jeff's point that high fever can have a negative impact on the baby too, and that should be discussed. Again, saying not to take it unless absolutely necessary seems like the best advice.

I have a major problem with people who just want this conversation shut down, and act like the science is settled. It's clearly not settled.
"Drown a fever !"

Ingesting large amounts of H2O for slight rises in body temps !
 
  • Like
Reactions: ILisBest

rillaman

Heisman
May 10, 2009
18,141
11,570
113
"Drown a fever !"

Ingesting large amounts of H2O for slight rises in body temps !

There are times that something extra is needed to reduce a fever. If your pregnant wife has a 103 fever, consult a doctor immediately. Maybe lower than that. Keep these discussions going, don’t shut down people from the other side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bung23 and ILisBest

tjfleck6

All-American
Apr 19, 2008
5,945
6,964
113
This has nothing to do with MAGA or politics, but just this morning I was listening to a podcast on the autism epidemic, with a researcher/practitioner at Northwestern was discussing a growing body of evidence that cases where autism appears during development (i.e., the child develops normally for a short period of time before development halts and the child begins displaying spectrum symptoms), that imbalances in the gut, oral, and nasal microbiomes seem to be linked and possibly causal. Prenatal exposure to tylenol is linked to lower gut microbiome diversity, and microbiome imbalance. I'm not a medical professional so I can't weigh in on whether there are situations where the benefits outweigh the risks, or even how to quantify the risks, but as someone with a conservative temperament I would be inclined to steer clear of the risk were I in a relevant situation.
Do you have a link or name of the podcast? TIA
 

AzIllini

Senior
Apr 26, 2003
2,289
687
78
Do a deep dive on who owned the land for last 25- 50 years !
I asked ChatGPT and it says the Bureau of Land Management (ie the govt) owns the land and a company called Solar Partners LLC built and runs it. The owners are NRG Energy (Houston based energy company) 50%, Google 28%, and a technology company based in Oakland 22%. I also asked about reclamation of the land after the plant and it could only identify that the LLC should have a bond to pay for it. Since it is an LLC, my guess is the owners have limited liability but Google does have deep pockets. Leaving abandoned mirrors, motors, etc, basically all the stuff they can't salvage in the desert would make most environmentalists cringe.

If you have some scandalous details, please share.
 

ILisBest

All-Conference
Jun 16, 2007
7,063
4,651
113
I am well aware having worked in health care for a large portion of my career. The tragedy will be if some women refuse to take Tylenol when they should and then have babies with birth defects that could have been prevented. Conventional medical wisdom is that Tylenol should only be used when necessary.


I thought you said you are an accountant?
 
Last edited:

BigWill

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
52,398
31,166
113
I thought you said you are an accountant?
Or a member of the PPU ?

I was a member of 3 Unions/Associations thru the years !

NFL Players Association.
NJSP Troopers Association.
NABET, National Assoc of Broadcast Electicians and Technicians, Local 15.
 
Last edited:

BigWill

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
52,398
31,166
113
I asked ChatGPT and it says the Bureau of Land Management (ie the govt) owns the land and a company called Solar Partners LLC built and runs it. The owners are NRG Energy (Houston based energy company) 50%, Google 28%, and a technology company based in Oakland 22%. I also asked about reclamation of the land after the plant and it could only identify that the LLC should have a bond to pay for it. Since it is an LLC, my guess is the owners have limited liability but Google does have deep pockets. Leaving abandoned mirrors, motors, etc, basically all the stuff they can't salvage in the desert would make most environmentalists cringe.

If you have some scandalous details, please share.
Boondoggles in the middle of nowhere usually have some relative/friend/politician (see Calif RR project) that have attached themselves to make millions !

ChatGPT rooms are merely repositories of bogus information ! (see black Pope )
 

bucshon

Senior
Staff member
May 10, 2017
1,146
881
113
The researchers noted that while steps should be taken to limit acetaminophen use, the drug is important for treating pain and fever during pregnancy, which can also harm the developing fetus. High fever can raise the risk of neural tube defects and preterm birth. “We recommend judicious acetaminophen use—lowest effective dose, shortest duration—under medical guidance, tailored to individual risk-benefit assessments, rather than a broad limitation,” they wrote.
Me-Same limitation on the use of any drug during pregnancy.

Agree, but they may want to try an alternative to acetaminophen for fever reduction if they have a lingering issue like the flu, Covid, etc.

These are discussions that need to occur, but people can't get past the politics of it (like everything else). RFK Jr. is a weird dude, no doubt, but we should look past the messenger and think about the explosion of chronic illness, ADHD, autism, etc. And certainly we should consider the motivations of the pharma companies. I don't see them as evil bad guys, but they do have motivation to sell as much of their products as possible.

The "here's a pill to take" culture in medicine isn't ideal.
 

djpc

All-American
Nov 2, 2001
16,028
6,944
93
...

The "here's a pill to take" culture in medicine isn't ideal.
You could argue that that culture is the engine that drives much of modern medicine. There may or may not be nefarious motives, but you see what happens when someone comes along and says, "Hey, maybe we should put more emphasis on keeping people from getting sick to begin with rather than waiting until they're already sick and then spend trillions so they get even sicker a little more slowly."
 

JeffT819

All-Conference
Dec 4, 2001
1,666
1,254
113
So, as an accountant who doesn't care about large debt, you fully support your party's push via Chuck-U Schumer to add 1.5T in additional debt or else the government shuts down. Got it. Hell of an accountant!
My political viewpoints have no impact on my accounting abilities. One has nothing to do with the other. What a strange comment.
 

AzIllini

Senior
Apr 26, 2003
2,289
687
78
For TJ: Illinois has released its own covid vaccine recommendations:
  • COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for:
    • All children ages 6 months through 23 months.
    • Children ages 2 years through 17 years who have at least one underlying risk factor, who have weakened immune systems, who have never been previously vaccinated for COVID-19, who live in congregate settings or live in households with those at risk for severe COVID-19.?
    • Children ages 2 years through 17 years without underlying risk factors whose parents/guardians want them to get a COVID-19 vaccine.
    • All pregnant people and those who are planning pregnancy, those who are postpartum (after pregnancy), or during lactation.
    • All adults 18 years and older.
 

Uncoach

All-American
Dec 8, 2011
6,244
8,524
113
For TJ: Illinois has released its own covid vaccine recommendations:
  • COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for:
    • All children ages 6 months through 23 months.
    • Children ages 2 years through 17 years who have at least one underlying risk factor, who have weakened immune systems, who have never been previously vaccinated for COVID-19, who live in congregate settings or live in households with those at risk for severe COVID-19.?
    • Children ages 2 years through 17 years without underlying risk factors whose parents/guardians want them to get a COVID-19 vaccine.
    • All pregnant people and those who are planning pregnancy, those who are postpartum (after pregnancy), or during lactation.
    • All adults 18 years and older.
Morons
 

tjfleck6

All-American
Apr 19, 2008
5,945
6,964
113
My political viewpoints have no impact on my accounting abilities. One has nothing to do with the other. What a strange comment.
Let’s just say I have a CFO in the family. Your company must have been awful with an all talk, no budget guy like you who wants to spend 1.5 T that we don’t have.

Sorry, I have zero respect for an accountant who supports total waste.
 

tjfleck6

All-American
Apr 19, 2008
5,945
6,964
113
For TJ: Illinois has released its own covid vaccine recommendations:
  • COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for:
    • All children ages 6 months through 23 months.
    • Children ages 2 years through 17 years who have at least one underlying risk factor, who have weakened immune systems, who have never been previously vaccinated for COVID-19, who live in congregate settings or live in households with those at risk for severe COVID-19.?
    • Children ages 2 years through 17 years without underlying risk factors whose parents/guardians want them to get a COVID-19 vaccine.
    • All pregnant people and those who are planning pregnancy, those who are postpartum (after pregnancy), or during lactation.
    • All adults 18 years and older.
Hard to take any guidance seriously when the idiots say “pregnant people”. An immediate warning that this is not serious “guidance”.
 

JeffT819

All-Conference
Dec 4, 2001
1,666
1,254
113
Let’s just say I have a CFO in the family. Your company must have been awful with an all talk, no budget guy like you who wants to spend 1.5 T that we don’t have.

Sorry, I have zero respect for an accountant who supports
I was a CFO for 13 years and you make no sense. You actually believe that only MAGA supporters are good accountants! Utterly bizarre.