Some outfit, looking to exploit college athletics, came up with this:
It was discussed here previously I believe, and I know it was on The Round Table.
This seems like it's from a different article?
Exactly. The only Northeast schools I want on our conference level are PSU and Maryland. The rest (BC, Cuse, Temple, Pitt, UConn) can rot in the minor leagues and get the piss beaten out of them by us if we play them in a bowl game.As much as I may like that division/schedule, for the time being I find it preferable to be in a premier conference while other local teams are in inferior conferences.
Or as a bought game opponent.Exactly. The only Northeast schools I want on our conference level are PSU and Maryland. The rest (BC, Cuse, Temple, Pitt, UConn) can rot in the minor leagues and get the piss beaten out of them by us if we play them in a bowl game.
Well for some sports a group thing isn't a bad idea.I think conferences would be a great idea…you know arrange teams so that they are close to each other, limiting expenses and so on.
I wonder if anyone else has thought of this?!?
![]()
unless the new superconference is only the SEC and B10 schools.They would be smart to govern themselves, kick NCAA to curb,have own player contracts.Yeah, there is no hope for a super league of that many teams. 0.0% chance.
In the latest CFP contract, the Big Ten and SEC are getting paid more than everybody else. They have separated themselves and the other leagues agreed to it!
They are not going to join a league where they’re going to be partners with a much larger group of schools.
Great idea for 5 years ago, but we are well past that now.