From the GOP being able to convene the Convention of States on their own with no DNC support. Think about the ramifications of that!
82 has like a 8 month long thread about that.From the GOP being able to convene the Convention of States on their own with no DNC support. Think about the ramifications of that!
I know, I don't read it. I honestly didn't know we were that close though.82 has like a 8 month long thread about that.
From the GOP being able to convene the Convention of States on their own with no DNC support. Think about the ramifications of that!
From the GOP being able to convene the Convention of States on their own with no DNC support. Think about the ramifications of that!
From the GOP being able to convene the Convention of States on their own with no DNC support. Think about the ramifications of that!
Yes it does have ramifications;both good and I would think bad . Good -- Would let us control term limits, salaries and benefits for Congress; could put a stop/or control to the Lobbyist activities. Bad - I will defer until I have put more thought/research to it. It has been 50+ years since my History/Problems of Democracy classes.
I'll go on record and say that a CoS with a supermajority of one party is bad, I don't care which party it is. The risk far outweighs the good that can come from it.Yes it does have ramifications;both good and I would think bad . Good -- Would let us control term limits, salaries and benefits for Congress; could put a stop/or control to the Lobbyist activities. Bad - I will defer until I have put more thought/research to it. It has been 50+ years since my History/Problems of Democracy classes.
I'll go on record and say that a CoS with a supermajority of one party is bad, I don't care which party it is. The risk far outweighs the good that can come from it.
I'll go on record and say that a CoS with a supermajority of one party is bad, I don't care which party it is. The risk far outweighs the good that can come from it.
I'll go on record and say that a CoS with a supermajority of one party is bad, I don't care which party it is. The risk far outweighs the good that can come from it.
I'll go on record and say that a CoS with a supermajority of one party is bad, I don't care which party it is. The risk far outweighs the good that can come from it.
It depends on your point of view. If an overwhelming majority of states want changes, it's called a Constitutional Republic. Not everyone will be pleased but the system is working.
It depends on your point of view. If an overwhelming majority of states want changes, it's called a Constitutional Republic. Not everyone will be pleased but the system is working.
I could agree with that without problem. My big hangup is I feel Congress worrys about their fut
May be wrong, but I believe we presently have a Constitutional Republic now.
http://www.usconstitution.net/constfaq_q76.html
Article 5 of our constitution allows Calling for a Convention of States.