The teams that consistently win playing out small ball approach, hardly ever get behind. It just the nature of the beast. You hardly ever put crooked numbers up on the scoreboard playing small ball. Only teams with power threats, can consistently come back from multi run deficits. To win with our approach we have to have a combination of things: Pitching to keep you in it and an offense that can win a majority of the innings. A lot of small minute unnoticed details influence games like this 4-1 game tonight. In the games I have watched this year we are pretty ****** on the base running. I've seen players tagging up multiple times when they had no means tagging and then I've seen players not tagging in situations where they should have been. These type of mental errors cost a lot of runs in the grand scheme and ultimately influence W's and L's. I've also noticed players not running on balls hit into the outfield, where the outfielders have had no chance to catch them.
I've yet to see this from our base runners. A good "Small Ball' team has excellent baserunning. Excellent baserunners take note of each and every outfielders position on each and every pitch. This allows the baserunner to read the ball off the bat and know if any outfielder can reach it most of the time. I've seen us hit gappers this year and a guy is standing close to 2nd until the ball is a few feet away from the ground, whereas a good runner would have known off the bat that the ball wouldnt be caught, and he'd score on the play. Yet, our runners hesitate, dont break early enough, hold up at third, and never score that inning. I've noticed this type of mistake with every one of Cohen's team, but got hammered last year every time I'd bring up a base running miscue.
I don't see baserunning getting much better, but then again a lot of college players are not properly taught the technique of baserunning.
Will be interesting to see what the NCAA does with the bats.