FAKE NEWS. At least post something accurate.Since ACA, our life expectancy has decreased. That's the one thing that the ACA has accomplished.
FAKE NEWS. At least post something accurate.Since ACA, our life expectancy has decreased. That's the one thing that the ACA has accomplished.
At least you are being honest with your personal opinions. I will. I think most Americans will. But your opinion and my opinion is bringing politics back into the conversation. That is my point. In order to FIND a solution, politics can't be part of it. Otherwise, it is a waste of time and everybody is focused on "winning" instead of fixing a problem.I agree, but then you still have people like me who will not vote for something that increases financial burden on myself for the benefit of someone else. I'm being honest, I truly don't care about my neighbor to the extent I'm willing to help.
This whole discussion on healthcare is framed as though people are entitled to healthcare. I don't believe they are.
Think it was estimated around 46 mil and the census (years later) pegged it at 42 mil.Didn't we start with 24 million uninsured prior to ACA?
What's the problem?At least you are being honest with your personal opinions. I will. I think most Americans will. But your opinion and my opinion is bringing politics back into the conversation. That is my point. In order to FIND a solution, politics can't be part of it. Otherwise, it is a waste of time and everybody is focused on "winning" instead of fixing a problem.
Ok, that sounds right.Think it was estimated around 46 mil and the census (years later) pegged it at 42 mil.
Is that a serious question?What's the problem?
Is that a serious question?
In case it is, affordable health care for all citizens without bankrupting individuals or the various states and federal government
AHA! PROOF: 46 mil - 42 mil = 4 million illegal votes. mic dropThink it was estimated around 46 mil and the census (years later) pegged it at 42 mil.
It was serious. Thank you for answering it.Is that a serious question?
In case it is, affordable health care for all citizens without bankrupting individuals or the various states and federal government
I don't know if i can define it. It is a subjective term. Do you understand what that means? But developing something that the majority of citizens pay into and everyone gets equal treatment is the goal. Yes, that sounds socialism. But we our country is full of socialistic type principles with high success. We don't have to give up being a largely capitalistic society just because we have a universal healthcare system. But we do need to be honest and that is currently a problem in this debate and that is due to politics, imo.Define affordable. Because it certainly isn't now for individuals or the government, and single payer won't be any better. The shell game as far as who pays for what will never change the cost of something. And here I thought you were an accountant or something.
I just don't care. Saying you don't care about your fellow man or their plight is not a popular stance.
I would bet that you probably get it through an employer. I would also bet that you didn't suffer hours cut, or lost your job because of the ACA. It has cost me a lot so I'm against it. How much did your deductible go to to keep your premium something you could afford?
It is a subjective term. Do you understand what that means?
Then kill the ACA and screw replacement.They are not willing and I don't blame them. The people that vote blindly for them do not care about what socialism brings to the American public. Healthcare was another rivet in the coffin that has been the American dream.
You are extremely lucky. I would guess you work for the governemnt which goes to show you who controls how much you pay. My deductible went from $500 to $6,000 in the last 8 years.I'm sure you wouldn't feel the way you do if that had happened to you.You keep trying to spin that narrative. Many of us have seen no increases in our premiums and no increases in our deductibles. We had adequate insurance to begin with and still have adequate insurance. And we kept our doctors.
Honestly, to me, it's either we end the ACA or we fix the ACA. The bills offered forth by the House and Senate don't seem to be much better than the current legislation in place....do they?How many times do i need to acknowledge this? Are you incapable of pulling up a couple of 1000 feet and talk about this from a pure strategic discussion? You in effect are making this and wanting this to be partisan apparently.
Who thinks it would be worse? I don't. Let the free market decide. Want to make costs go down, stop all the stupid regulations that healthcare has had to under go in the last 16 years, starting with Bush. Lower what people can win in malpractice claims. Loser pays in insurance cases.Then kill the ACA and screw replacement.
Says the man that's never made bad life decisions?For the record, I truly feel like there are only two options. 1. Single Payer, 2. The way it was before ACA. I'd prefer #2, but now it becomes a touchy feely, haves and have nots, defense vs non-defense spending. Frankly, there is never going to be an agreement on that. It seems people are unwilling to say what needs to be said to people without insurance: make better life decisions and that sadly, there are just have and have nots in life.
If you ask me, a catastrophic health care expense might be one legitimate reason for bankruptcy. Not because you put too much on a credit card paying for beer and chips.Is that a serious question?
In case it is, affordable health care for all citizens without bankrupting individuals or the various states and federal government
And you work for the Gov't, correct?You keep trying to spin that narrative. Many of us have seen no increases in our premiums and no increases in our deductibles. We had adequate insurance to begin with and still have adequate insurance. And we kept our doctors.
No, I've said repeatedly it's dogshit.Honestly, to me, it's either we end the ACA or we fix the ACA. The bills offered forth by the House and Senate don't seem to be much better than the current legislation in place....do they?
So, let's assume we end the ACA as you put it. How does that help the Dem initiative? It doesn't. It pleases me, but it doesn't help the Dems. Would it be better for them to provide input into the next revision or continue to obstruct assuming they could get some of what they want incorporated.Honestly, to me, it's either we end the ACA or we fix the ACA. The bills offered forth by the House and Senate don't seem to be much better than the current legislation in place....do they?
It's not a popular stance politically, but I doubt too many of your friends stop calls by you when they hear your take on helping your fellow man. However, you served, so by default you've helped your fellow man. If the right was honest (like you are being), they would simply kill the ACA and end the talk of this bs. You want The Senate to put partisan politics aside and work to a solution? That's not going to happen after a President like Trump gets elected bashing the opposition party's agenda to the degree he did. That's politics, handing the GOP a win would simply cement the midterms for them.It was serious. Thank you for answering it.
In short, I don't agree there is or was a problem.
The reason I point that out is how fundamentally separated the two sides are on the issues. As I said earlier, the whole premise of the discussion is based on the framing of there being a problem when I disagree that there is. I'm one of the few on the right willing to say the truth of their position though because I acknowledge how it sounds, I just don't care. Saying you don't care about your fellow man or their plight is not a popular stance.
It could help them, once whatever is next becomes unpopular.So, let's assume we end the ACA as you put it. How does that help the Dem initiative? It doesn't. It pleases me, but it doesn't help the Dems. Would it be better for them to provide input into the next revision or continue to obstruct assuming they could get some of what they want incorporated.
For the record, I truly feel like there are only two options. 1. Single Payer, 2. The way it was before ACA. I'd prefer #2, but now it becomes a touchy feely, haves and have nots, defense vs non-defense spending. Frankly, there is never going to be an agreement on that. It seems people are unwilling to say what needs to be said to people without insurance: make better life decisions and that sadly, there are just have and have nots in life.
Where did you get that? I've made plenty of bad life decisions, and when I do, I deal with them to better my situation. I don't even understand your comment. I'm never satisfied with where I'm at, I'm constantly seeking improvement, mostly driven financially, but not always, and regardless, self improvement never stops for me. There is always the next challenge personally and professionally. I don't know what would cause me to ever stop and say I'm comfortable and want no changes. Are there people who don't?Says the man that's never made bad life decisions?
Catastrophic is such a moving bogey though. What I can absorb and what someone else can are two entirely different numbers.There's a number 3. A combination of both. Single payer catastrophic coverage, mixed with HSA's and personal payment. Insurance itself is the problem.
There are barriers for some. Sometimes, yes, it's race....but sometimes it's integrity, family, mental or physical limitations.Where did you get that? I've made plenty of bad life decisions, and when I do, I deal with them to better my situation. I don't even understand your comment. I'm never satisfied with where I'm at, I'm constantly seeking improvement, mostly driven financially, but not always, and regardless, self improvement never stops for me. There is always the next challenge personally and professionally. I don't know what would cause me to ever stop and say I'm comfortable and want no changes. Are there people who don't?
And we still have 31 uninsured. 11 were eligible for Medicare and ACA was able to get them covered by Medicaid after Obama won his reelection. Does that not account for 42 million uninsured at the beginning of this abortion?Think it was estimated around 46 mil and the census (years later) pegged it at 42 mil.
When was health insurance a right? Highlighted before, but never settled that it is a constitutional right. If it has been accepted by the politically powerful, they are wrong to make such a decree without a way to finance it other than borrowing.There's a number 3. A combination of both. Single payer catastrophic coverage, mixed with HSA's and personal payment. Insurance itself is the problem.
Ive noticed a lot of board lefties are reveling in the failure of the Trumpcare initiative, IMO rightfully so. It falls far short of what I'd support but I'd imagine for entirely different reasons.
My real question is does anyone on here actually think Obamacare is an acceptable alternative in its current form? If not, what is the aversion then to repealing it so that it can be replaced? This thing has failed, bigly. My desire would be for a bi-partisan solution but Dems have made clear that's off the table. Why?
A real reason for bankruptcy law. Not too much beer, chips and bacon on your credit cardCatastrophic is such a moving bogey though. What I can absorb and what someone else can are two entirely different numbers.
I acknowledge we all don't start on 3rd base, that doesn't excuse or relieve the need for betterment. You don't know where I started and or the life decisions I've made to get where I am. It's funny, I can see you've made some assumptions about me without knowing the details and decisions I've made in life. Maybe i started off life in a trailer park to two parents that didn't graduate highschool. Maybe I started life in a divorced home. Maybe I had parental involvement and maybe i had a network of folks who cared. Maybe my parents were wealthy by WV standards and maybe the weren't. Did any of that carry over when I shunned family directives and blazed my own trail enlisting into the Marine Corps at 17 and shunning the predestined silver spoon path and never looked back. Maybe all of that is true within my household and maybe it's not. To presume any of it is true without acknowledging I might have overcome some significant adversity in life to reach the clear air I'm in now or to discount it is amusing to me.There are barriers for some. Sometimes, yes, it's race....but sometimes it's integrity, family, mental or physical limitations.
All I'm saying is that for some of us, it's easy to act like anyone in a poor condition is there because they don't make good decisions or work hard enough.
Ahhh the three food groups.A real reason for bankruptcy law. Not too much beer, chips and bacon on your credit card
I think an issue is that Medicare was expanded under the ACA from what it previously was. Not sure on that point though.When Obamacare went into effect, i got hammered. Our company health insurance qualifying criteria were rewritten as part of the backroom deal with the insurance companies that enabled Obamacare to pass, such that we no longer qualified for company health insurance (they rewrote what contstituted part-time v. full-time employment at my wife's corporate employer, through whom we carried our health insurance). I had to go into the marketplace to buy health insurance for my wife, three kids, and myself. With a $5,000 deductible, i forked out just over $16,000 in premiums each year for two years, until we were able to meet the company's qualifying criteria again. Obamacare sucks.
Having said that, it stuns me that the ill-fated attempt to revise/replace/whatever Obamacare included a complete repudiation of Trump's campaign promise to not cut Medicaid. A new healthcare bill that eliminates care for the needy (and, yes, there are a lot of truly needy folks who should not be screwed because some other jerks abuse the system) and reduces benefits for the elderly is going to have a tough time getting through even a Republican-controlled Congress. People believed Trump when he repeatedly promised to not cut those programs. With Republicans controlling the White House, the Senate, and the House of Representatives, one would think a workable healthcare plan could be drafted and passed. Get it done, and get on with other business.
I've made plenty of bad life decisions, and when I do, I deal with them to better my situation. I don't even understand your comment. I'm never satisfied with where I'm at, I'm constantly seeking improvement
Well said!When Obamacare went into effect, i got hammered. Our company health insurance qualifying criteria were rewritten as part of the backroom deal with the insurance companies that enabled Obamacare to pass, such that we no longer qualified for company health insurance (they rewrote what contstituted part-time v. full-time employment at my wife's corporate employer, through whom we carried our health insurance). I had to go into the marketplace to buy health insurance for my wife, three kids, and myself. With a $5,000 deductible, i forked out just over $16,000 in premiums each year for two years, until we were able to meet the company's qualifying criteria again. Obamacare sucks.
Having said that, it stuns me that the ill-fated attempt to revise/replace/whatever Obamacare included a complete repudiation of Trump's campaign promise to not cut Medicaid. A new healthcare bill that eliminates care for the needy (and, yes, there are a lot of truly needy folks who should not be screwed because some other jerks abuse the system) and reduces benefits for the elderly is going to have a tough time getting through even a Republican-controlled Congress. People believed Trump when he repeatedly promised to not cut those programs. With Republicans controlling the White House, the Senate, and the House of Representatives, one would think a workable healthcare plan could be drafted and passed. Get it done, and get on with other business.
Come down off that soap box Johnny BA, you look like a fool up there. The ONLY thing I assume about you, is that you served. I think I remember something about a farm....could have been another winger I have respect for on here, I don't know. I don't care where you started.....wasn't my point. I have a good friend whose parents were extremely wealthy. His father was a ranking Dem in the House, and corrupt as all hell. He refused to take a dime. His gf got pregnant at a young age, he worked hard (no college) to provide.....did well with a small business of his own. Cancer struck, he went bankrupt taking care of her, not just medical bills.....but the inability to cover his business. Even with help from friends. He is now working as a bartender, so he can spend time getting his kid ready for school in the mornings, and switch shifts to be at her dance recitals. Hard working guy. Wouldn't have changed a large decision he's ever made, probably.....struggles every week financially.I acknowledge we all don't start on 3rd base, that doesn't excuse or relieve the need for betterment. You don't know where I started and or the life decisions I've made to get where I am. It's funny, I can see you've made some assumptions about me without knowing the details and decisions I've made in life. Maybe i started off life in a trailer park to two parents that didn't graduate highschool. Maybe I started life in a divorced home. Maybe I had parental involvement and maybe i had a network of folks who cared. Maybe my parents were wealthy by WV standards and maybe the weren't. Did any of that carry over when I shunned family directives and blazed my own trail enlisting into the Marine Corps at 17 and shunning the predestined silver spoon path and never looked back. Maybe all of that is true within my household and maybe it's not. To presume any of it is true without acknowledging I might have overcome some significant adversity in life to reach the clear air I'm in now or to discount it is amusing to me.
I also feel hardship is a relative scale depending on where you grew up. For instance 3rd base in WV might the equivalent of starting at 1st somewhere else. Educationally, I'd argue WV would put us at a disadvantage to many in the North East.
All of that though is irrelevant towards the character of men. My point in life made me but it doesn't define me. My path defines me. I've never accepted defeat in adversity at any point in my life. The process of accepting defeat is worse to me than being defeated.
And PLEASE notice I said A LITTLE HELP. I'm not trying to build a hippie dippy communist utopia here.I acknowledge we all don't start on 3rd base, that doesn't excuse or relieve the need for betterment. You don't know where I started and or the life decisions I've made to get where I am. It's funny, I can see you've made some assumptions about me without knowing the details and decisions I've made in life. Maybe i started off life in a trailer park to two parents that didn't graduate highschool. Maybe I started life in a divorced home. Maybe I had parental involvement and maybe i had a network of folks who cared. Maybe my parents were wealthy by WV standards and maybe the weren't. Did any of that carry over when I shunned family directives and blazed my own trail enlisting into the Marine Corps at 17 and shunning the predestined silver spoon path and never looked back. Maybe all of that is true within my household and maybe it's not. To presume any of it is true without acknowledging I might have overcome some significant adversity in life to reach the clear air I'm in now or to discount it is amusing to me.
I also feel hardship is a relative scale depending on where you grew up. For instance 3rd base in WV might the equivalent of starting at 1st somewhere else. Educationally, I'd argue WV would put us at a disadvantage to many in the North East.
All of that though is irrelevant towards the character of men. My point in life made me but it doesn't define me. My path defines me. I've never accepted defeat in adversity at any point in my life. The process of accepting defeat is worse to me than being defeated.