It is with me and many others. I can't understand how any would not like it.and none of that is popular or working to make american lives better.
It is with me and many others. I can't understand how any would not like it.and none of that is popular or working to make american lives better.
Because you need to have a certain set of skills to understand: Empathy, critical thinking skills and accountability.It is with me and many others. I can't understand how any would not like it.
I'm with you. But i can understand people not liking it a. Because they are focused on instant gratification and b. they have been conditioned to hate trump as the top priority. if they just hate trump harder that means they are more virtuous.It is with me and many others. I can't understand how any would not like it.
Look, I understand all that. But IMO, the balance has shifted since the last year. When my wife who isn't a far right nut, but an avid Trump supporter, looks at TV reports and say "Trump need to ease back on all this foreign stuff and concentrate on the problems at home", that tells me Trump needs to concentrate on things at home.So you are saying that you are disappointed in Trump performance and will vote for dem in midterms knowing what they did for 4 years and historically do when in control if he can't bring prices down to your satisfaction? Do you realize how hard it is to bring prices down after a new standard has been set?
Trump has stabilized some food prices. More to come.
Trump has shut the border and is deporting illegals. That should incrementally help bring prices down with less demand.
Trump locked in the middle class tax cuts that would have expired at the end of this year.
Trump has significantly facilitated lower gas prices that help the vast majority of the population.
I can't see how anyone with a brain would think the dems with what they do can come close to getting near the Trump performance level.
Let's stay logical in all this thinking.
I think you and tiger growls might be missing my point. Let me try again. Trump needs a republican house and Senate to complete his agenda. There is an election in 2026. Republican representatives/senators are not going to get reelected on NATO, bombing Iran or any of those things. In fact, they might not even be discussed in campaigns.I'm with you. But i can understand people not liking it a. Because they are focused on instant gratification and b. they have been conditioned to hate trump as the top priority. if they just hate trump harder that means they are more virtuous.
The fact that we have NATO finally paying their way for their own defense. Denmark ponying up to beef up defense of the Arctic ( all the Greenland hoopla was just to set the negotiating table). Have South Korea and Japan starting to beef up military spending. Australia as well...buying/building nuke subs !!! Securing the border- Huge. Deporting illegals - Huge. Curtailing the USAID shennanigans and funding of NGOs for B.S. that should not be funded with public money. Resetting global trade. Kneecapping Iran's nuke weapons program. etc. etc.
This is one big miss by conservatives, and while I understand the left is as swayed by propaganda and are in their echo chambers as much as the right, this is a miss.I'm with you. But i can understand people not liking it a. Because they are focused on instant gratification and b. they have been conditioned to hate trump as the top priority. if they just hate trump harder that means they are more virtuous.
Just my opinion. Don't want @tigres88 to think I'm speaking for every voter
Maybe i misread. I understand your point.I think you and tiger growls might be missing my point. Let me try again. Trump needs a republican house and Senate to complete his agenda. There is an election in 2026. Republican representatives/senators are not going to get reelected on NATO, bombing Iran or any of those things. In fact, they might not even be discussed in campaigns.
The issues in 2026 are going to be housing, healthcare, affordability, maybe immigration and democrats are doing better - at least in my wife's mind - than are republicans. Voters vote their pocketbook and just because you are doing better, doesn't mean everyone else is.
Just my opinion. Don't want @tigres88 to think I'm speaking for every voter
I don't disagree with anything you posted. But policies runs in 2 years cycles.Maybe i misread. I understand your point.
I understand that people have different focus. I also am not disagreeing with you. Trump needs to shift to start winning over the me, me, right now people and those who are emo forward even though he is over the target on all the big stuff that really will make a lasting difference.
You may disagree, but I believe that the big picuture focus that trump has had will do more good in the long run for everyone than 1/2 of the country is giving him credit for. There is more than enough prosperity to go around if we only would focus. We could / should have the best schools the best highways the best rail system, better mental health care for those that reallyt need it etc, but we can't do that with relatively small number of american taxpayers not only paying for the majority of americans to live, but also paying for the defense of the world, importing people who are are a net drain on resources, sending $$$$$ everywhere for questionable/ no benifit to US Citizens etc.
edit: My wife is of the same mindset. Gotta change the direction of the ocean liner, which is tough to do when a lot of the crew are fighting against you. Once the ship gets on a correct course a lot of issues will start resolving.
I think that Trump has until the end of this year before he needs to make winning midterms his top priority.
You are hilariously out of your mind junior.Because you need to have a certain set of skills to understand: Empathy, critical thinking skills and accountability.
Well I will agree that he has focused more on international issues than I thought he would but I dont think he is doing it at the expense of neglecting his domestic agenda. He could do a lot more if not for the rino's infesting congress imo. He has already done more than Kamala would of done domestically. Our tax rates would be going up January 1st without the BBB and gas would still be high and no telling what would be the state of inflation. You think Harris would of done anything to help? Remember over 95% of media coverage on Trump is negative.Look, I understand all that. But IMO, the balance has shifted since the last year. When my wife who isn't a far right nut, but an avid Trump supporter, looks at TV reports and say "Trump need to ease back on all this foreign stuff and concentrate on the problems at home", that tells me Trump needs to concentrate on things at home.
Politics is what have you done for me lately game.
That's perverted man. Lol!!!You can still see his vajayjay neck.![]()
Listen here you ***** made boot licker, I can tolerate you not agreeing with my opinions but you aren't calling this 45 year old, junior. Get a new thesaurus, venture out into creative language. But I don't think we need to allow you to pretend you are my superior, in any capacity.You are hilariously out of your mind junior.
Well I will agree that he has focused more on international issues than I thought he would but I dont think he is doing it at the expense of neglecting his domestic agenda. He could do a lot more if not for the rino's infesting congress imo. He has already done more than Kamala would of done domestically. Our tax rates would be going up January 1st without the BBB and gas would still be high and no telling what would be the state of inflation. You think Harris would of done anything to help? Remember over 95% of media coverage on Trump is negative.
he's not totally wrong. A major problem with our system is that the operators develope requirements and pass it to the procurers to buy. Things go on so long that over time, requirements change. Then comes the change orders. that drives up the cost and extends the delivery time. If you've never seen it, watch "the Pentagon Wars" a satire about the army's purchase of the Bradley fighting vehicle.![]()
Hegseth says he wants the Pentagon to prioritize speed over cost when buying weapons
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says the Pentagon is revamping how the military buys weapons, shifting the focus away from producing advanced and complex technology and toward products that can be made and delivered quickly.apnews.com
A cub scout running the military!!
Im 61 so you are my junior. No personal disrespect intended.Listen here you ***** made boot licker, I can tolerate you not agreeing with my opinions but you aren't calling this 45 year old, junior. Get a new thesaurus, venture out into creative language. But I don't think we need to allow you to pretend you are my superior, in any capacity.
Lol....its not like you haven't insulted me personally many times on this board. It must be your time of the month.Listen here you ***** made boot licker, I can tolerate you not agreeing with my opinions but you aren't calling this 45 year old, junior. Get a new thesaurus, venture out into creative language. But I don't think we need to allow you to pretend you are my superior, in any capacity.
This make you happy Ned?I don't disagree with anything you posted. But policies runs in 2 years cycles.
If I were Trump advisor, I would have him start work now on some form of a comprehensive immigration plan: an ACA upgrade - not a repeal and replace - keep the good and better the bad: a plan for housing, something like a backing for developer/building loans, government supported home loans, something to get mortgage rates below 6%, maybe a 40 year mortgage or something: a plan for lowering grocery prices. I don't know how you do that, but maybe someone smarter than I on farm/distribution methods might add some ideas,
That would be more than enough for the next year.
@ Aldi Eggs were almost $5 last year and are 1.96 right now. Milk was 2.46 today. I don't remember when it was significantly below $3 I have noticed some "deals" on hard goods as well. Beef is through the roof. Drumsticks are going for 1.09/lbagain, I agree with everything in your post. But to be fair, I don't think anyone cares, at this point what Kamala might have done The issue will be what have you done for me lately. It's JMO, but the prices of groceries have not gone down, and you know the rest. Voters are fickle and if we've learned anything the economy and healthcare are going to drive elections in 2026
This make you happy Ned?
JUST IN: President Trump is going ALL-IN on the price of meat, saying there appears to be FOUL PLAY
“While Cattle Prices have dropped substantially, the price of Boxed Beef has gone up — Therefore, you know that something is “fishy.” We will get to the bottom of it very quickly. If there is criminality, those people responsible will pay a steep price!”
This is important! Glad he’s focusing on it!
Ned it's up to us elders to educate our young ones. Under the scenario you mentioned the incumbents will just get voted out almost every election. Trump didn't create this cluster mess on cost of living. It's on the dems squarely. The young people need to pay attention and learn basic economics. My kids are having the same problem on getting in that first house and all the associated increase but they are not blaming Donald Trump at all.makes me happier, But you're missing my point. The cost of living has been increasing, nobody can argue that .And, to the voter they don't care who's fault it is. And the voter doesn't care if cost of eggs is going down or gas is below $3.00.
I have kids just starting out. I listen to them. and like most people their age (and I was the same way starting out) they look at their income and expenses each month. We always taught ours to "pay himself first" and then budget the rest. So here's their deal. They get their income and after looking at their budget, rent, food, internet, heat, healthcare, car insurance, car payment and student loans (mine don't have these) etc and there's not enough to meet expenses much less pay themselves. It's not a micro issue. It's a bottom line issue. And you're arguing the micro - item by item basis.
Trump got elected in part because of the cost of living. He promised to reduce prices on day 1. He didn't - and yes, I know that was hyperbole - but that was his promise.
I get it, you'll vote for Trump or Vance or whoever has an "R" next to their name in the next presidential election, but those my kid's age won't. Mamdani hit on the issue most important to the voters right now "affordability", and guess what, that issue belongs to the democrats, because it's a negative in voter's minds and Trump owns it.
You can disagree, but until the economy gets to a point where you can pay yourself first, and your income exceeds your expenses on a monthly basis republicans, the party in power, will be the ones voters hold responsible. Again, just my opinion.
makes me happier, But you're missing my point. The cost of living has been increasing, nobody can argue that .And, to the voter they don't care who's fault it is. And the voter doesn't care if cost of eggs is going down or gas is below $3.00.
I have kids just starting out. I listen to them. and like most people their age (and I was the same way starting out) they look at their income and expenses each month. We always taught ours to "pay himself first" and then budget the rest. So here's their deal. They get their income and after looking at their budget, rent, food, internet, heat, healthcare, car insurance, car payment and student loans (mine don't have these) etc and there's not enough to meet expenses much less pay themselves. It's not a micro issue. It's a bottom line issue. And you're arguing the micro - item by item basis.
Trump got elected in part because of the cost of living. He promised to reduce prices on day 1. He didn't - and yes, I know that was hyperbole - but that was his promise.
I get it, you'll vote for Trump or Vance or whoever has an "R" next to their name in the next presidential election, but those my kid's age won't. Mamdani hit on the issue most important to the voters right now "affordability", and guess what, that issue belongs to the democrats, because it's a negative in voter's minds and Trump owns it.
You can disagree, but until the economy gets to a point where you can pay yourself first, and your income exceeds your expenses on a monthly basis republicans, the party in power, will be the ones voters hold responsible. Again, just my opinion.
Good stuff.
𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗜
𝗦𝗲𝗲 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽 𝗗𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆...
You see Trump’s arrogance,
I see Trump’s confidence.
You see Trump’s nationalism,
I see Trump’s Patriotism.
You hear Trump’s
unsophisticated words,
I hear Trump’s honesty.
You see Trump’s racism,
I see Trump’s words
being misconstrued
and twisted by the media
daily to fit their narrative.
You see Trump
as a republican,
I see Trump as a Patriot.
You see Trump as a dictator,
I see Trump as a leader.
You see Trump
as an authoritarian,
I see Trump as the only one
willing to fight
for our freedom.
You see Trump as childish,
I see Trump as a fighter,
unwilling to cave to the lies.
You see Trump
as an unpolished politician,
I see Trump
as a breath of fresh air.
You think Trump
hates immigrants,
I know Trump
is married to an immigrant.
You see Trump putting an end
to immigration in America,
I see Trump welcoming
immigrants to America
LEGALLY.
You see Trump
destroying Democracy,
I see Trump
saving our Constitutional Republic.
You see Trump
with a struggling economy,
I saw Trump
with an amazing economy
before the Democrats
collapsed it.
You see the violence
in the streets and call it
“Trumps America”,
I see the violence
in the streets of democrat run
NGO’s who are creating chaos
and call it
“Liberal America”.
You want someone
more Presidential,
I’m happy we have someone
who finally
doesn’t just talk the talk
but actually walks the walk.
You and I?
We see things very differently.
(Attributed to King Frog / Truth Social)


Yeah, truly heartwarming. Just like all of Trump's pardons. He and the people he pardons have one thing in common. They're all crooks.Great story.
Presidential pardon. Trump Pardons Cheyenne Diesel Delete Mechanic Troy Lake.
It was the prosecutors fault for sending Jeffrey Dahmer to prison.Nope. It's Trump and his toadies at the Supreme Court.