Elmore embarrasses himself 4 times per broadcast. The guy has zero fans. He must have some serious dirt on a TV exec.
Elmore embarrasses himself 4 times per broadcast. The guy has zero fans. He must have some serious dirt on a TV exec.
Me either Show, I gave us little chance because we are so thin. But those 7 players are pretty good ball players. Its very nice to be wrong and I think this game puts us right in the ACC mix at the top. I am so friggin proud and elated by this team.Wow. Did not think we would play this good. I'm proud of this team on that one.
Duhon vs. Redick pre game shootouts were insane. Once Duhon made like 12 in a row starting at the 3 point line and taking a few steps back each time. His last one was from behind half court, then he went into the locker room like no big deal. Redick too would hit 90% in pregame and his misses were rim outs.Interesting comment about the offense or Shooting I should say.
I sat second row for warm ups and was really watching form and shooting for almost 30 minutes of Thornton, Jones, Allen, Kennard, and Ingram. All but thornton lived at the 3 point line. Thornton took a ton of every kind of shot. Allen and Ingram were the only ones that ever got hot making a serious run of 3's in a row. I texted my buddy stating this and how it shows in the game. I don't know if in the full 30 minutes if I ever saw Kennard or Jones make more than maybe 2 or max 3 in a row from 3. It's truly shocking for Kennard. He makes it look really smooth but has absolutely no legs and no arch in his shot which is difficult to make from 3 consistently. In warm ups his 3 ball was all over the place where as with Ingram and Allen everyone looked like it could go in. I remember watching JJ shoot in warm ups and he would constantly make 10, 15, 20 3's in a row at times from all over, it was truly impressive and you knew you were watching an incredible shooter. Kennard is a baller and has some serious handle and shocking good hops when he's on the move, but he has a long way to go with the 3 point shot. Hope he finds his legs and shot soon as that could help make this offense lethal. He actually didn't take a few pretty open 3's, wonder if his confidence is down?
Just a FYI , Wake has beaten LSU, UCLA and Indiana. We need Amile to handle Thomas, and we don't have that. He will eat Plumlee alive.
He did eat Plumlee alive? Just so happened he made a few dumb mistakes and got himself in foul trouble and out most of the second half. Remember Wake scored 47 in the first half with Thomas on the court. Plumlee was playing matador D on him. Plumlee definitely finished stronger than normal but lets not act like he was getting offensive rebounds or creating his opportunities, they came from our guards having awesome drive and dishes to him. Now you still have to finish, and he did a darn good job of that.
Interesting comment about the offense or Shooting I should say.
It's truly shocking for Kennard. He makes it look really smooth but has absolutely no legs and no arch in his shot which is difficult to make from 3 consistently.
He did eat Plumlee alive? Just so happened he made a few dumb mistakes and got himself in foul trouble and out most of the second half. Remember Wake scored 47 in the first half with Thomas on the court. Plumlee was playing matador D on him. Plumlee definitely finished stronger than normal but lets not act like he was getting offensive rebounds or creating his opportunities, they came from our guards having awesome drive and dishes to him. Now you still have to finish, and he did a darn good job of that.
But Thomas was eating Plumlee alive.
See it grinds my gear that people including K keep saying we're thin on the front line. We have 3 healthy 7 footers. Just so happens 2 are frosh. We are not thin, we just don't have quality depth. Huge difference. K makes it sound like he has no other options. That's not true.Yes, but I wonder about the "matador" defense. What I wonder is how much of that is/was planned for Plumlee in this game. We are thinner than Brandon Ingram's legs in our front court and Coach K knows that. He needs Plumlee in the post for as much as possible and if we do not need Plumlee to be more aggressive on D (keeping a lead as we did the entire game) then why risk getting him benched. Let Thomas have his that call for Direct Confrontation so Plumlee stays on the floor.
Plumlee affected a fair amount of plays on the defensive end with his size and presence. Thomas was getting his, but so what. They did not get nor ever have the lead. I am sure if push came to shove we would have seen some adjustments making Plumlee more aggressive.
I say this as an educated guess as it is consistent with coaching decisions Coach K has discussed in the past.
I truly think that Plumlee's matador defense against Thomas was a K directive. And a damn smart one if that was the case.
ESPN3 might be showing it in its archives.Hate so much I missed this game ugh. Just so freaking busy forgot to record it.
Of all things, that bugs you? That K says "no depth" as opposed to "no quality depth"? Did the "8 is enough" mantra bug you last year because we had walk-ons available beyond that?See it grinds my gear that people including K keep saying we're thin on the front line. We have 3 healthy 7 footers. Just so happens 2 are frosh. We are not thin, we just don't have quality depth. Huge difference. K makes it sound like he has no other options. That's not true.
Have you ever noticed that most of the people that always seem to complain are the people that rarely post on the board?Of all things, that bugs you? That K says "no depth" as opposed to "no quality depth"? Did the "8 is enough" mantra bug you last year because we had walk-ons available beyond that?
Of all things, that bugs you? That K says "no depth" as opposed to "no quality depth"? Did the "8 is enough" mantra bug you last year because we had walk-ons available beyond that?
That was big. Personally, I'd say it happened at halftime. Marshall had scored some close buckets off passes in the first half -- that and offensive rebounds have pretty much accounted for every field goal he has on the season -- but he was aggressive in driving to the hoop with the ball early in the second. That's where Thomas picked up his 3rd foul, and then the tech for his 4th right after.Turning point in the game was a self inflicted technical by wake.
What, not Amile?Lastly, I think Marshall, of all our players, has been most hindered by the Amile injury.
It was also pretty key that the last TV timeout happened so late and Manning couldn't get Thomas back in the game until then. I don't remember when he last went to the bench, but according to the box score, we were up 8 w/ just over 4 left. We got to 2:28 before the T.O., and were up by 10 w/ the ball and like, 4 seconds on the shot clock. .
Nope because that was a theme to help motivate after Rasheed got kicked off the team. "We have no depth" I don't think is a theme or mantra to motivate players this year, it sounds like an excuse for poor big recruiting and development.Of all things, that bugs you? That K says "no depth" as opposed to "no quality depth"? Did the "8 is enough" mantra bug you last year because we had walk-ons available beyond that?
I agree with everything you said. Jeter and Vrank aren't ready most likely for more minutes.It sounds like nit-picking to me, Get Nasty. Jeter and Vrank are there, but right now they're not quality depth. Chase has flashes and you can see he's going to be a decent player down the line, but right now the games move too fast for him....not to mention he's still not strong enough with the ball. That will come.
It's hard to say on Vrank....we haven't seen him. But the coaches have. They would know better than I do, or you.
And what do you mean by options? Just because someone is 7'0" doesn't make him a viable option.
Lastly, I think Marshall, of all our players, has been most hindered by the Amile injury.