This is where it gets interesting.....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...d-by-the-epas-website/?utm_term=.ae00488b4b82
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...d-by-the-epas-website/?utm_term=.ae00488b4b82
Of course it is The guy is a nut and a typical right wing denier. Anyone that is shocked at his comment today should have their head examined. He has expressed those thoughts many times before and like almost every person in Trump's cabinet and Administration except very few, he is a pathological liar and exhibited his propensity to lie during his confirmation.This is where it gets interesting.....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...d-by-the-epas-website/?utm_term=.ae00488b4b82
https://watchers.news/2012/03/09/active-volcanoes-in-the-world-last-7-days-report/
![]()
17 volcanoes have shown changes in activity last week. New unusual activity has been noticed around 5 volcanoes (below).
BEZYMIANNY
Central Kamchatka (Russia)55.978°N, 160.587°E; summit elev. 2882 m
KVERT reported that during 24 February-2 March seismic activity at Bezymianny remained elevated, with about 7-19 weak events registered daily. A thermal anomaly was detected in satellite images. Gas-and-steam activity was observed on 26 February; clouds obscured the volcano on the other days. One short volcanic tremor episode was detected on 29 February. About 40 seismic events were detected on 1 March and, according to satellite data analysis, the size and brightness of a thermal anomaly abruptly increased on 2 March. The Aviation Color Code was raised to Red. During 2-5 March there were 25-40 weak seismic events detected; cloud cover prevented observations of the volcano.
Bezymianny volcano in Kamchakta Peninsula on red alert – showing signs of possible eruption
CLEVELAND
Chuginadak Island52.825°N, 169.944°W; summit elev. 1730 m
AVO reported that during 24 February-2 March satellite images of Cleveland revealed no unusual activity and no significant changes in the size of the lava dome. A weak thermal anomaly was detected in satellite imagery on 3 March. The Volcano Alert Level remained at Watch and the Aviation Color Code remained at Orange. No current seismic information was available because Cleveland does not have a real-time seismic network.
ETNA
Sicily (Italy)37.734°N, 15.004°E; summit elev. 3330 m
Sezione di Catania – Osservatorio Etneo reported that the third episode of lava fountaining from Etna’s New Southeast Crater (New SEC) occurred on the morning of 4 March and was more explosive than the preceding episode. The beginning of the eruption was characterized by a rapid increase in volcanic tremor amplitude coincident with Strombolian explosions that increased in intensity and frequency. Just after 08:00 lava overflowed the deep breach in the SE rim of the crater and reached the SE base of the cone within 15 minutes, then advanced towards the W rim of the Valle del Bove. Explosive activity changed to continuous lava fountaining and an eruption plume developed at about 0830. Large pyroclasts fell on the steep flanks of the cone, causing avalanches.
At about 08:50 small pyroclastic flows generated by the partial collapse of the eruption column mainly descended the NE flank, and somewhat down the S flank. A lava flow was emitted from a new eruptive vent on the upper SW flank of the New SEC cone and descended into the saddle between the old and new SEC cones. The lava interacted with snow, causing powerful explosions and small pyroclastic flows. These phreatic explosions generated jets of vapor and launched rock fragments to distances of several tens of meters. A lahar developed which traveled toward the “Belvedere” monitoring station, on the W rim of the Valle del Bove, and passed a few tens of meters to the N of the monitoring instruments.
A lava flow also issued from an eruptive fissure on the upper N flank of the cone and descended a few hundred meters to the NE, surrounding the N base of the cone. After descending the steep W slope of the Valle del Bove, the flow split into several branches on the more gently sloping terrain. These branches exceeded in length those of 9 February, reaching a total distance of about 3.5 km from the crater. Shortly after 1000, the activity started to diminish; lava fountaining ceased at 1032, two hours after the onset of the paroxysmal phase. The lava flow emitted from the fissure on the SW flank of the cone continued advancing for a few hours after the cessation of the activity.
The eruption column rose several kilometers above the summit of Etna. Ash and lapilli were carried NE by the wind, affecting the areas around Piedimonte, Etneo, and Taormina. Fine ash fell as far as the Messina area and southern Calabria. Again, the pyroclastic cone of the New SEC had grown in height, mainly on its N rim. Checkout Etna WebCams here.
KANAGA
Andreanof Islands51.923°N, 177.168°W; summit elev. 1307 m
AVO reported that the level of unrest at Kanaga declined to background levels. On 2 March the Volcano Alert Level was lowered to Normal and the Aviation Color Code was lowered to Green.
TUNGURAHUA
Ecuador1.467°S, 78.442°W; summit elev. 5023 m
IG reported that during 29 February-2 March cloud cover prevented views of Tungurahua. On 3 March seismicity increased. Clouds mostly prevented observations; during breaks in the cloud cover ash plumes were observed rising 3 km above the crater and drifting S and SW. Explosions ejected blocks that rolled down the flanks. Two of the explosions generated sounds resembling cannon shots, and vibrated windows. Ashfall was reported in Choglontus (13 km WSW), Manzano (8 km SW), Cahuají (8 km SW), and Motilones (W). On 4 March ashfall was reported in Yuibug and observers noted hot deposits from a small pyroclastic flow that occurred high in the Achupashal drainage (NW). Ash plumes observed during breaks in the cloud cover on 5 March rose 1 km and drifted W. Ash again fell in Choglontus. Clouds prevented observations on 6 March.
Ongoing activity was noted among the following volcanoes :
Bagana, Bougainville (Melanesia) – Fuego (Guatemala) – El Hierro, Canary Islands (Spain) – Karymsky, Eastern Kamchatka (Russia) – Kilauea, Hawaii (USA) – Kizimen, Eastern Kamchatka (Russia) –Popocatépetl (México) – Puyehue-Cordón Caulle, Central Chile (Chile) – Sakura-jima, Kyushu (Japan) –Santa María (Guatemala) – Shiveluch, Central Kamchatka (Russia) – Suwanose-jima, Ryukyu Islands (Japan)
This response is strictly emptopnal outburst with little in the way of truth, science or reason. Spoken like a true, blinded, liberal Dem.Of course it is The guy is a nut and a typical right wing denier. Anyone that is shocked at his comment today should have their head examined. He has expressed those thoughts many times before and like almost every person in Trump's cabinet and Administration except very few, he is a pathological liar and exhibited his propensity to lie during his confirmation.
The country has never been run by a bigger bunch of fools in its history.
The good news is as Biff and Pruitt try to dismantle clean air and water regulation to strip emission standards on industrial plants, Boom! We have years of science waiting to shine in a courtroom.Of course it is The guy is a nut and a typical right wing denier. Anyone that is shocked at his comment today should have their head examined. He has expressed those thoughts many times before and like almost every person in Trump's cabinet and Administration except very few, he is a pathological liar and exhibited his propensity to lie during his confirmation.
The country has never been run by a bigger bunch of fools in its history.
You better have better science than the horseshit you snake oil salesmen are peddling.The good news is as Biff and Pruitt try to dismantle clean air and water regulation to strip emission standards on industrial plants, Boom! We have years of science waiting to shine in a courtroom.
Cool. As soon as scientists stop cooking the numbers and modeling becomes more reliable and accurate, I'll sign up.Pruitt's carving out the the CO2 indicator scientist use to measure emmissions, and instead saying, hey, look over here at the other climate change problems we should focus on. The flaw in this approach is that isolating CO2 as not being important distracts us from the root problems in industrialized economies and shifts us towards other symptoms without fixing the deeper problem. He, and Trump. simply do not want their big energy deep pockets to lose any money until they absolutely are forced to, eventhough, the gas and oil scientists used CO2 as a measuring tool for emmissions back in the 70's and found a 'documented' impact on the environment. I mean come on, smog blocking out the sun has to impact climate and smog is CO2(less visible than nitrogen or sulfur oxides but a lower atomic number and inner building block of smog) Bottom-line, we need to clean up our act and it's not going to be comfortable and easy for us spoiled 21st century humans. The "Don't touch the economy" fear-mongers will push us dangerously close to something taking life-times to correct.
Sure. Mankind has no affect on its environmentClimate change is bs...
The EARTH DECIDES YOUR CLIMATE.
Science? You have to look past science to even begin to refute man's affect upon climate variables.This response is strictly emptopnal outburst with little in the way of truth, science or reason. Spoken like a true, blinded, liberal Dem.
Cool. As soon as scientists stop cooking the numbers and modeling becomes more reliable and accurate, I'll sign up.
At that point....might be too late....it might be too late nowCool. As soon as scientists stop cooking the numbers and modeling becomes more reliable and accurate, I'll sign up.
At that point....might be too late....it might be too late now
Those evil scientists! Never anything concrete about what they do. Always trying to manipulate truth for money. Let's trust politicians and businessmanPiling on, be able to predict with accuracy what changes will have what impact to our environment and global temperatures. They can't even predict 5 years out within error range what is going to happen to global temperatures without any change. They can't accurately model history. I have no need to believe these models, nor scientists.
We spend trillions to protect ourselves from invasion every year.Well of course. It might be too late to save us from an asteroid impact, also. Quick! Let's spend trillions of dollars to defend against it!
There's a lot of damage they can be done that has nothing to do directly with CO2 emissions but rather other toxicants like heavy metals lead, mercury etc. Seems that the same types of regulations to loosen standards regarding CO2 can increase heavy metal emissions. The impacts of these is known, science is strong and will be challenged by Biff and Butthead. I mentioned this before.Piling on, be able to predict with accuracy what changes will have what impact to our environment and global temperatures. They can't even predict 5 years out within error range what is going to happen to global temperatures without any change. They can't accurately model history. I have no need to believe these models, nor scientists.
You better have better science than the horseshit you snake oil salesmen are peddling.
How much? When we can determine exactly how we affect it we can start there.Sure. Mankind has no affect on its environment
I work with plenty of engineers who all feel the same way. Sorry if that makes you feel inferior.Once again, you prove you are not an engineer.
Thanks.
Trillions? All we need is a good oil rig crew. NextIt might be too late to save us from an asteroid impact, also. Quick! Let's spend trillions of dollars to defend against it!
How much? When we can determine exactly how we affect it we can start there.
We are already conservative in our behavior so what more should we do and how much more and what benefit will that be? I don't think the contribution of man is significant compared to many other things that are outside of our control, but that is just my opinion.Well, if there's 51% chance/possibility/certainty we impact climate, I'd say why not be conservative in our behavior and choices versus waiting until we're 99.9999898% certain to do so. I guess, I'm in the 51% possibility we do camp...
Trillions? All we need is a good oil rig crew. Next