Toggle sidebar

Epstein - 33,000+ Pages Released - Plot Twist - Trump FBI Informant Vs Epstein

P

PalmettoTiger1

Heisman
Jan 24, 2009
10,912
10,788
113
hopefultiger13 said:
Dude, you definitely are out of your tree here. What did you think when Bill Clinton said it depends on what you mean by it? Did you think, oh well THAT explains it. I guess he DIDN'T have sex with her? Or did you think that he was full of ****? Because I thought he was full of ****... and so did most of the rest of the country.

Again, here's the quote from that video, WORD FOR WORD:

Reporter: "...the DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffery Epstein's clients, will that really happen?"

Bondi "It's on my desk right now to review. That's been a directive by President Trump..."

Any normal person would think that the "It" refers to the client list. But here's another reason for you. Bondi seems well spoken and educated. I don't think I've ever heard her use bad grammar. IF she was referring to the files (PLURAL) wouldn't it go like this?

Reporter: "...the DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffery Epstein's clients, will that really happen?"

(Bondie now answers but refers to the files (PLURAL)

Bondi "They are on my desk right now to review. That's been a directive by President Trump..."

<<It's>> is a contraction of <<it>> short for <<it is>>. <<It>> is a singular pronoun.

For instance, I ask "You have two cars, where are they?"

Do you answer "It's in the garage"? OR

Do you answer "They are in the garage"?

Bondi wasn't referring to the files, or she would have said "They are on my desk right now to review. That's been a directive of President Trump..."

She was straight up lying and in my opinion, not because there's really anything mind blowing in the files (like a list), but because there actually isn't anything super damning there, just mildly disturbing and Trump is in there with a lot of others on both sides of the aisle.

I'm with most of the board here in that I don't think that these files (or client list if there is one), directly implicate President Trump. The reason for this is that if there was a direct implication, the Biden Administration would have released it and damn the consequences. TDS, remember? Likewise, if they directly implicated only the Dems, Trump would have released it. IMHO, these files will show that LOTS of people on both sides of the aisle were hanging out with this guy and enjoying it (INCLUDING Trump). But they don't give a smoking gun on anyone.
Click to expand...

I think and I may be wrong that the list at one time existed and is now hidden by the CIA and the majority of people are Democrats and wealthy businessmen who are implicated.

Trump is not on that list.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: yoshi121374 and dpic73
UrHuckleberry

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
5,777
12,725
113
Rep Massie has now stated that John Paulson, who is a billionaire GOP donor, was in Epstein's black book. Would help explain part of why Trump/Johnson have fought to keep it from all being released.

(Disclaimer: I am not trying to make this partisan, it wouldn't surprise me if some major Dem donors are in it as well)

(Second disclaimer: I've said this before, but just because someone was a financial client, doesn't necessarily mean they were directly paying for the trafficking of children which honestly is likely why it hadn't been released previously, a lot of people are going to be stained by their name on a list that truly may not have done anything wrong).
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
UrHuckleberry

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
5,777
12,725
113
ANEW said:
Nah. People are too distracted because the DoD is getting its name changed.
Click to expand...
I mainly just think it’s humorous that people who have followed Trump for years and think he wouldn’t have been screaming that fact from the rooftops every time it’s brought up. Like, Trump is not exactly tight lipped. That’s one of the things MAGA loves about him. And for years MAGA has been pushing on the Epstein storyline (understandably), and so it just humors me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom