Epstein - Maxwell to Testify August 11th - Bill Clinton Subpoenaed - John Kerry Implicated
- Thread starter fatpiggy
- Start date
He isn't calling for us to forget about it, and isn't in a position to cover anything up or not release anything.
What would you expect people on a message board to discuss on him? Not sure how we can show "caring about both". Just add a tagline about him everytime we discuss the case and the files release in real time?
"I don't understand why they won't release the files (please charge Clinton if guilty)"
Why didn't the Biden admin release the files? I don't understand why they weren't released then, especially if they had the goods on Trump. Doesn't make much sense. None of it makes any sense, which should lead us all to believe that something is awry.
All fair questions. I suspect there was some delay due to Maxwell's trial where it's fairly standard to have docs under seal. Have zero idea on the timing of any of that, that being said.
My point there was specific to Bill Clinton. Like us on a message board would have anything to discuss right now.
I know I personally have said to charge anyone guilty, Dem or Repub, etc. And I'm sure I'm not the only one in this thread. So I just didn't understand the Clinton call out.
The files had been sealed before Biden came into office and the case against Epstein dismissed. The Biden administration accepted it and never spoke about releasing a list, that was a MAGA demand.
Trump is firing in too many directions for there not to be something there, but that's the beauty of conspiracy theories, they are not rooted in sound logic so they can never be disproven. It is interesting that after all the lies, subterfuge, threats, gamesmanship, and flat out attacks on civil liberties that THIS is the thing that gets the Trumpers riled up. I believe that is why Trump is "mishandling" it so poorly: he is not doing anything or acting in any way he has not done before, just this time some of the far right aren't buying it. I think that is what is confusing him.
Personally, I think this is just the straw breaking the camel's back. I work with die hard Trumpers and they are getting annoyed too. They wanted to be out of funding a foreign war in Ukraine, but the US is kind of back to doing it. Plus any dollars that weren't spent on Ukraine in the short term were more than spent on Israel so either way they weren't back in US pockets. These guys also wanted fiscal responsibility so the crap bill that was passed adding to the deficit didn't sit well with them either. I think this just adds on to it - they are realizing, albeit at a glacial pace, that Trump really doesn't give a damn about anybody but himself and will say and do whatever needs to be said or done to benefit himself. Just my $.02.
Personally, I think this is just the straw breaking the camel's back. I work with die hard Trumpers and they are getting annoyed too. They wanted to be out of funding a foreign war in Ukraine, but the US is kind of back to doing it. Plus any dollars that weren't spent on Ukraine in the short term were more than spent on Israel so either way they weren't back in US pockets. These guys also wanted fiscal responsibility so the crap bill that was passed adding to the deficit didn't sit well with them either. I think this just adds on to it - they are realizing, albeit at a glacial pace, that Trump really doesn't give a damn about anybody but himself and will say and do whatever needs to be said or done to benefit himself. Just my $.02.
Post more. Appreciate some measured and weighted dialog.
You poor sap. Allow me to point out the frickin' obvious for you. Trump's reference to "all CREDIBLE information about Epstein" means all information implicating Democrats or anyone else Trump does not like, and excludes any and all information concerning Trump's activities with his best friend Epstein.
The problem for Trump at this point is that his MAGA base is unlikely to accept anything other than a public dissemination of everything concerning Epstein, which will be a disaster for a bunch of folks on both sides of the political aisle, but particularly for Trump. He'll probably attempt a selective disclosure and style it as a complete disclosure but, if that happens, expect leaks to commence almost immediately.
Last edited:
Holy shiat. You're still citing Q?!! You should just quit posting. BWAHAHAHAHA!!!
BTW, when, exactly is Hillary gonna be carted off to the hoosegow? I thought Q said a couple of years ago that Hillary was already under some kind of secret "arrest."
Wait, you're calling her out for saying there are bigger fish to fry? Really?
It's wild to hear him bash his own followers. @TigerGrowls Trump called you naive, and for once I actually agree with him about something. You beloved he was a good guy and not a scumbag. That was extremely naive.
Again, where was the WSJ when Clinton was implicated with much more evidence?
We are upset at the two tieres and the WSJ just perpetuates the problem.
Considering their past, they are not a trustworthy news source and will probably embellish to the max.
Just release all the evidence and let the chips fall where they may.
We are upset at the two tieres and the WSJ just perpetuates the problem.
Considering their past, they are not a trustworthy news source and will probably embellish to the max.
Just release all the evidence and let the chips fall where they may.
I believe Trump. This is made up fodder by the WSJ. Yawn
I’ve been highly critical of Trump, but this just screams fake.
I’ve been highly critical of Trump, but this just screams fake.
lol fatpiggy is really struggling. he's going from initially being a Trump worshiper to questioning Trump to now pivoting to Bill Clinton for some bizarre reason.
Man, remember when Trump acted like he didn't know Epstein well? I write birthday notes to all kinds of people i don't know well WOW
Man, remember when Trump acted like he didn't know Epstein well? I write birthday notes to all kinds of people i don't know well WOW
It's amazing to watch MAGA have to come to the realization in real time that Trump is a horrible person who likely assaulted underage girls
"Pertinent" will be everything that doesn't include him.
Please provide a link on this info. Never heard of it.