Epstein - Maxwell to Testify August 11th - Bill Clinton Subpoenaed - John Kerry Implicated

UrHuckleberry

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2024
5,440
12,164
113
@fatpiggy what are your thoughts on the early recess to avoid a release vote? You’ve been pretty critical, so just curious. I know you’re all aboard the treason train, but speaking to this specific move.

And despite it being 9 years, them having the documents they’re talking about right now for those previous 4 years, and now for 6 months, do you find the timing at all suspect? My guess would be yes, but you think the treason stuff needed to happen so don’t really care that it at least appears to be a distraction (similar to all the other rants Trump’s been going on).

And have you commented on the 1000 agents combing the files for Trump mention? I think in your shoes, you likely think it makes sense since you believe the Russian hoax was made up, that they would try to check for other made up stuff or something?

You’ve been very vocal about all this so just trying to understand how you process this information.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,583
15,108
113
@fatpiggy what are your thoughts on the early recess to avoid a release vote? You’ve been pretty critical, so just curious. I know you’re all aboard the treason train, but speaking to this specific move.

And despite it being 9 years, them having the documents they’re talking about right now for those previous 4 years, and now for 6 months, do you find the timing at all suspect? My guess would be yes, but you think the treason stuff needed to happen so don’t really care that it at least appears to be a distraction (similar to all the other rants Trump’s been going on).

And have you commented on the 1000 agents combing the files for Trump mention? I think in your shoes, you likely think it makes sense since you believe the Russian hoax was made up, that they would try to check for other made up stuff or something?

You’ve been very vocal about all this so just trying to understand how you process this information.
I think this is a subject that democrats are latching onto because it’s the first thing that has gotten traction to slow Trump down.

I think republicans don’t want to give democrats an inch and want to control the narrative. Being that they lied and cheated with the collusion BS during Trumps first term I don’t really blame them.

I do think there needs to be transparency on the Epstein issue. All “clients” need to be exposed no matter who they are. We deserve to know if this was an intel operation and if so who was running it.

I think public pressure will continue until something happens. It’s not going away, it just won’t be allowed to be used as a tool by the democrats to slow down the MAGA agenda.

I think the Trump admin going after Obama is a big message that there will be no more of that.

It’s a fair criticism from democrats on the way it is being currently handled, but it doesn’t carry much weight when they did exactly nothing about it when they were in power. If they wanted control of the investigation, they had the power to do that. Now it will be done according to how republicans want it to be done.

If democrats want to be mad, be mad at electing an inept leader who did nothing about it.

My $.02
 

UrHuckleberry

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2024
5,440
12,164
113
I think this is a subject that democrats are latching onto because it’s the first thing that has gotten traction to slow Trump down.

I think republicans don’t want to give democrats an inch and want to control the narrative. Being that they lied and cheated with the collusion BS during Trumps first term I don’t really blame them.

I do think there needs to be transparency on the Epstein issue. All “clients” need to be exposed no matter who they are. We deserve to know if this was an intel operation and if so who was running it.

I think public pressure will continue until something happens. It’s not going away, it just won’t be allowed to be used as a tool by the democrats to slow down the MAGA agenda.

I think the Trump admin going after Obama is a big message that there will be no more of that.

It’s a fair criticism from democrats on the way it is being currently handled, but it doesn’t carry much weight when they did exactly nothing about it when they were in power. If they wanted control of the investigation, they had the power to do that. Now it will be done according to how republicans want it to be done.

If democrats want to be mad, be mad at electing an inept leader who did nothing about it.

My $.02
Thank you for sharing. Though I think if the administration had done what they said they were going to do (not just said they were going to, but screamed about for years), then the subject wouldn't have any footing. So I think Dems are latching on due to that hypocrisy. As its so stark, if that makes sense. There isn't a lot of wiggle room on the position, so to speak. (I don't think hypocrisy is partisan, for the record)

Also don't think doing what you've been saying you were going to do for years is giving democrats anything. That feels like a rebrand to me. They could have controlled the narrative. In fact, they did fully control the narrative until they started saying there wasn't a story to narrate at all.

As far as what Dem's could've done, I don't disagree. While I think there are likely reasons it wasn't released previously and isn't be released now, not all of them are nefarious (like court docs do get sealed, or things aren't released during ongoing investigations). Then again, it could 100% be that powerful people are in them. My biggest issue right now is that they aren't saying those things. They are calling people evil for being interested in them, and 100% making repeated moves that scream coverup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

ANEW

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2023
1,253
2,065
113
it certainly doesn't yell "no republicans involved"
But it doesn't yell "republicans involved" either. The majority of the repub base believes that there is more to this story and want's more info. No question. I think most think that the admin has mishandled this issue. edit: I do.

The repub base will be ok with wating a bit more as long as more info comes out. Right now there are some trade deals getting signed and announced, and we have the Obama-Russia hoax info that is now out in the news cycle. No need to crowd that out.
 

yoshi121374

Well-known member
Jan 26, 2006
11,547
20,061
113
But it doesn't yell "republicans involved" either. The majority of the repub base believes that there is more to this story and want's more info. No question. I think most think that the admin has mishandled this issue. edit: I do.

The repub base will be ok with wating a bit more as long as more info comes out. Right now there are some trade deals getting signed and announced, and we have the Obama-Russia hoax info that is now out in the news cycle. No need to crowd that out.

The Obama/Russia Hoax is a perfect name for the swerve Trump is trying to pull.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

UrHuckleberry

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2024
5,440
12,164
113
But it doesn't yell "republicans involved" either. The majority of the repub base believes that there is more to this story and want's more info. No question. I think most think that the admin has mishandled this issue. edit: I do.

The repub base will be ok with wating a bit more as long as more info comes out. Right now there are some trade deals getting signed and announced, and we have the Obama-Russia hoax info that is now out in the news cycle. No need to crowd that out.
I think it does yell that. Doesn't mean its true. But it does 100% look like a coverup.
 

ANEW

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2023
1,253
2,065
113
I think it does yell that. Doesn't mean its true. But it does 100% look like a coverup.
Yes just like everything looks like a life preserver to someone who is drowning.

If there is a coverup, it was happening for years the biden admin. So the fake urgency by anyone on the left is just that. Fake.

More info will come out because the republican base / MAGA wants it to. Trump admin mis-handeled this for sure. .
 

UrHuckleberry

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2024
5,440
12,164
113
Yes just like everything looks like a life preserver to someone who is drowning.

If there is a coverup, it was happening for years the biden admin. So the fake urgency by anyone on the left is just that. Fake.

More info will come out because the republican base / MAGA wants it to. Trump admin mis-handeled this for sure. .
Man, you know it appears like a coverup. I literally said it doesn't mean it is. But he is acting guilty as hell. His response has frankly been bizarre to me.
 

yoshi121374

Well-known member
Jan 26, 2006
11,547
20,061
113
Man, you know it appears like a coverup. I literally said it doesn't mean it is. But he is acting guilty as hell. His response has frankly been bizarre to me.

Absolutely. He's screaming and blaming and trying to shift attention with a furiousness.

Doesn't mean he's guilty or anything, but boy it looks guilty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,583
15,108
113
Yawn - We want to know if he was a client. That's it.

Everyone knows he was an associate of Epstein.

 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

ANEW

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2023
1,253
2,065
113
What makes you think she knows what's in it?
It just looks fishy. And, that's all that is needed to start a baseless rumor or score a gotcha point on a message board. Don't try and get logical on me with this.

I'm not one of the trump supporters that cares all that much about this. I think that if something was buried it was buried long before now and it's not going to come out. This is going to end up being a big nothing. I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy

dpic73

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2005
22,254
17,138
113
It just looks fishy. And, that's all that is needed to start a baseless rumor or score a gotcha point on a message board. Don't try and get logical on me with this.

I'm not one of the trump supporters that cares all that much about this. I think that if something was buried it was buried long before now and it's not going to come out. This is going to end up being a big nothing. I think.
"Don't try and get logical on me with this"

LOL, k but we already understood before this happened that it's very rare to release grand jury testimony and it's not so simple. Not because of the deep state but because of the law...
 

ANEW

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2023
1,253
2,065
113
"Don't try and get logical on me with this"

LOL, k but we already understood before this happened that it's very rare to release grand jury testimony and it's not so simple. Not because of the deep state but because of the law...
Great move to request it. Tried and got told no.
 

tboonpickens

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2001
16,252
25,616
113
Just crazy that Bondi went from telling the Fox News morons that she had the file waiting on her desk to telling Trump he’s all over the files to telling the world oh gee there’s really nothing to see here.

She knows how dumb the average MAGA voter is.
 

baltimorened

Active member
May 29, 2001
542
430
63
The Obama/Russia Hoax is a perfect name for the swerve Trump is trying to pull.
I wouldn't jump on that train too quickly. You may be 100%right, but Gabbard has gone way, way, way out on a limb on this one. She must have something worth referring to Justice Dept, and supposedly she has whistleblowers prepared to come forward. (Not they are always factually correct) Wait and see with a questioning eye might be the right move, for now. If Gabbard has cried wolf, her political career is over and she' d better learn to cook burgers and fries.

If Trump needed a swerve, He got one yesterday with the three trade deals. This whole Gabbard thing seemed to come out of the blue and with the Aug 1 trade deadline coming up he'd been better off holding the swerve until then. Unless, of course, he has something else lined up
 

baltimorened

Active member
May 29, 2001
542
430
63
"Don't try and get logical on me with this"

LOL, k but we already understood before this happened that it's very rare to release grand jury testimony and it's not so simple. Not because of the deep state but because of the law...
I guess my thought on this is kind of simple, if Biden admin knew Trump was involved with Epstein, then Harris knew. If Harris knew surely she would have thrown this factoid out during the campaign.

Now I don't profess to know a thing about Epsteun other than some young women/girls were having sex. With whom and why I have no idea.
 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,583
15,108
113
I wouldn't jump on that train too quickly. You may be 100%right, but Gabbard has gone way, way, way out on a limb on this one. She must have something worth referring to Justice Dept, and supposedly she has whistleblowers prepared to come forward. (Not they are always factually correct) Wait and see with a questioning eye might be the right move, for now. If Gabbard has cried wolf, her political career is over and she' d better learn to cook burgers and fries.

If Trump needed a swerve, He got one yesterday with the three trade deals. This whole Gabbard thing seemed to come out of the blue and with the Aug 1 trade deadline coming up he'd been better off holding the swerve until then. Unless, of course, he has something else lined up
There is no IF there. It's in plain sight for everyone to see. We all can read and know what happened.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: yoshi121374

tboonpickens

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2001
16,252
25,616
113
I wouldn't jump on that train too quickly. You may be 100%right, but Gabbard has gone way, way, way out on a limb on this one. She must have something worth referring to Justice Dept, and supposedly she has whistleblowers prepared to come forward. (Not they are always factually correct) Wait and see with a questioning eye might be the right move, for now.
jesus christ dude are you this naive in all facets of life?
 

baltimorened

Active member
May 29, 2001
542
430
63
Just crazy that Bondi went from telling the Fox News morons that she had the file waiting on her desk to telling Trump he’s all over the files to telling the world oh gee there’s really nothing to see here.

She knows how dumb the average MAGA voter is.
I've got news for you, she told the entire country she had the file waiting on her desk. What none of us know is what was in the files...was it 10 pages, 50? What did it contain, flight logs, names of guests, names of young women, itineraries, who knows.

Let's not forget, those files were created during the Biden years. You might think that someone in the DoJ during that period knew what was in there. And Bondi fired most, if not all, of the Biden supporters, why hasn't one of them come forward>|?

And Dershowitz , who was named by one of the girls as having had sex with her (subsequently recanted) says he has seen some of the files/names _ how did he get access?

Anyway, this whole thing is like a novella. Tune in tomorrow to see another episode.

By the way, IMO, it would be suspect if Trump's name is not on the flight/visitor logs. By now everybody knows he was friends with Epstein until their falling out. But so far nobody has come forward saying they had sex with him and boy that evidence would mean a multi-million dollar payout (or a deep sleep with the fishes).

Another episode tomorrow
 

tboonpickens

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2001
16,252
25,616
113
this baltimore dude loves giving a felon/rapist/criminal/serial liar/womanizer/thief/epstein bro the benefit of the doubt like he's Mother Teresa. i hope if i'm ever caught redhanded murdering someone i have a jury full of baltimore guy here. :rolleyes:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73

UrHuckleberry

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2024
5,440
12,164
113
I wouldn't jump on that train too quickly. You may be 100%right, but Gabbard has gone way, way, way out on a limb on this one. She must have something worth referring to Justice Dept, and supposedly she has whistleblowers prepared to come forward. (Not they are always factually correct) Wait and see with a questioning eye might be the right move, for now. If Gabbard has cried wolf, her political career is over and she' d better learn to cook burgers and fries.

If Trump needed a swerve, He got one yesterday with the three trade deals. This whole Gabbard thing seemed to come out of the blue and with the Aug 1 trade deadline coming up he'd been better off holding the swerve until then. Unless, of course, he has something else lined up
You really think Gabbard's political career is on the line? Feels like regardless of whether it ends up having merit, she'll have a spot because she's clearly following Trump's orders and will.
 

tboonpickens

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2001
16,252
25,616
113
You really think Gabbard's political career is on the line? Feels like regardless of whether it ends up having merit, she'll have a spot because she's clearly following Trump's orders and will.
yeah i'm sure Gabbard's career is on the line as much as any of the other failsons in his orbit. all the matters is if he likes what you're doing or not. trump himself sounded like he was throwing her under the bus with iran, but his pickled brain bounces from one thing to the next with no introspection. none of the morons in this administration have any credibility to lose frankly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

UrHuckleberry

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2024
5,440
12,164
113
yeah i'm sure Gabbard's career is on the line as much as any of the other failsons in his orbit. all the matters is if he likes what you're doing or not. trump himself sounded like he was throwing her under the bus with iran, but his pickled brain bounces from one thing to the next with no introspection. none of the morons in this administration have any credibility to lose frankly.
I just don't think this matters either way. She's part of the administration regardless. So she will be tainted regardless for people on the left. And MAGA will only care that she is doing what Trump wants and they believe should be done.