Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 129515127" data-attributes="member: 1428007">This is completely false.&nbsp; The network partners cannot void the contract if a conference loses members.&nbsp; What they would do at some point if a conference loses members is reduce the contract- Bowlsby stated the BIG 12 has a composition clause for a pro rata share for defections written in the contracts.&nbsp; They cannot simply throw the contract away.You haven't offered any proof the GOR document is real and you are claiming it is- the burden of proof is on you or anyone else claiming it is since the only knowledge and/ or presentation of it has been by anonymous posters on message boards.&nbsp; As I pointed out the proof should be simple- let's see the ACCs GOR for an example.&nbsp; Or the Big Tens or the PAC 12s.&nbsp; Otherwise there's no point in discussing the fake anymore.&nbsp; No news organization is going to do a write up on something that doesn't exist and it doesn't go unnoticed not one of them has presented a public version of a TV Contract from any conference or a grant of rights from any conference or school ever. They have certainly written articles about the matter and could put in FOIA requests for these with more weight than message board posters. No, the burden of proof is on those claiming this document is real when there is no verification of that anywhere.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Buckaineer, post: 129515127, member: 1428007"] This is completely false. The network partners cannot void the contract if a conference loses members. What they would do at some point if a conference loses members is reduce the contract- Bowlsby stated the BIG 12 has a composition clause for a pro rata share for defections written in the contracts. They cannot simply throw the contract away. You haven't offered any proof the GOR document is real and you are claiming it is- the burden of proof is on you or anyone else claiming it is since the only knowledge and/ or presentation of it has been by anonymous posters on message boards. As I pointed out the proof should be simple- let's see the ACCs GOR for an example. Or the Big Tens or the PAC 12s. Otherwise there's no point in discussing the fake anymore. No news organization is going to do a write up on something that doesn't exist and it doesn't go unnoticed not one of them has presented a public version of a TV Contract from any conference or a grant of rights from any conference or school ever. They have certainly written articles about the matter and could put in FOIA requests for these with more weight than message board posters. No, the burden of proof is on those claiming this document is real when there is no verification of that anywhere. [/QUOTE]

Name