Face of the NRA

PriddyBoy

Junior
May 29, 2001
17,174
282
0
Warning for KunreeRhodes: Dana uses a double negative. You may not want to waste 1:12 of your intellect on this idiot.
 

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
NRA, all real sportsmen like President Bush quit that organization long ago, it ain't about gun rights it's about lobbying for the gun industry. Only pussies worry someone will take their guns.
 

TarHeelEer

Redshirt
Dec 15, 2002
89,286
37
48
Question from a legal idiot.....Didn't we already have an assault weapon ban? Did it not survive legal challenges?

It did, but it was different. The prior banned specific attributes of the gun. So the gunmakers went just shy of those attributes. AR's were still available, just not with a green button (stupid example, no time to look it up).

This one is different banning the look and feel.
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
NRA, all real sportsmen like President Bush quit that organization long ago, it ain't about gun rights it's about lobbying for the gun industry. Only pussies worry someone will take their guns.

Sure thing.... sure thing.....
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
It did, but it was different. The prior banned specific attributes of the gun. So the gunmakers went just shy of those attributes. AR's were still available, just not with a green button (stupid example, no time to look it up).

This one is different banning the look and feel.

I don't think it ever faced a full legal challenge either.

Plus, it proved that it was ineffective and nothing more than a slap on the back feel good measure.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,555
40
31
It did, but it was different. The prior banned specific attributes of the gun. So the gunmakers went just shy of those attributes. AR's were still available, just not with a green button (stupid example, no time to look it up).

This one is different banning the look and feel.
OK. I honestly don't know. Just bothers me that any gun related measure immediately has a world is ending, we all gon die reaction.
 

PriddyBoy

Junior
May 29, 2001
17,174
282
0
Gun control means the government doesn't trust the citizenry with guns. Well, much of the citizenry doesn't trust the government. The founders put in the second amendment for good cause, to keep the government under control.
 

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
OK. I honestly don't know. Just bothers me that any gun related measure immediately has a world is ending, we all gon die reaction.
Working in the natural resource world, I'm surrounded by people with LOTS of guns. And you're right, any tweaking of gun laws, regardless how small or trivial, is indeed ungod-like and will be met with apocalyptic fury.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,688
1,758
113
Working in the natural resource world, I'm surrounded by people with LOTS of guns. And you're right, any tweaking of gun laws, regardless how small or trivial, is indeed ungod-like and will be met with apocalyptic fury.
As it should, just like any inference of interfering with any other amendment to the Constitution should be met with equal apocalyptic fury. Recent discussions surrounding the Press come to mind.
 

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
As it should, just like any inference of interfering with any other amendment to the Constitution should be met with equal apocalyptic fury. Recent discussions surrounding the Press come to mind.
Yeah well, the gun crowd is a little nervous. Walk through a Cabelas and shout the words 'background check' and you'll see a stampede heading toward the gun counter.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,688
1,758
113
Yeah well, the gun crowd is a little nervous. Walk through a Cabelas and shout the words 'background check' and you'll see a stampede heading toward the gun counter.
Make the comment that fake news is the enemy of the people and all of the sudden news organizations are ammending quotes and riling up the rubes that our President is attacking the 1st amendment. At least one promotes commerce.