There would be two different standards because there's a difference between people mocking Tebow's signature touchdown celebration and someone just blatantly mocking Michael Sam's sexuality. Tebowing was phenomenon that took off like planking. Just because Tebow tried to associate it with right-wing fundamentalism, it didn't mean that everyone else did.
Apparently, MSU not only invented grilling food in the outfield, Dak was the first guy to point up after scoring a touchdown. If Bo Wallace scored a touchdown and pointed up, I wouldn't know he was mocking anybody.
I think you'd have a better argument if you said that someone mocked Sam by acting like he was shoving cake into a teammate's mouth and simulated licking it off his face. I may be wrong for thinking that would be hilarious, but I don't think you would get the same double standard.
And as a brief aside, there was constant outrage, constant outrage, that Tebow's faith wasn't talked about enough in the media. Yet, all I heard about when I cut on the damn TV was how Tebow was an uber christian who hasn't had sex with his big-titted girlfriend because he's not married. Tebow got drafted in the first round. He's hopped from team to team, and he couldn't cut it. People who could give a **** about the fundamentals of football are up in arms all over social media about how mistreated the first round pick who was traded from team to team was because a gay guy got drafted. Got drafted. He got drafted in the 7th round, and this is an affront to Tebow somehow.
Michael Sam may suck *** in the NFL, but that's not good enough. We need affirmative action for Tebow, the really good Christian guy who couldn't hack it.
Not getting what you want all of the time is not getting persecuted.