I am just saying, none of us really know how this went down back in December/January. We don't know the impetus for turning this in. I, like most everyone else on here, would like to think that this is our routine - that we do this for every recruit that comes to us and overtly asks for money - but I don't know that to be true. Alternatively, if we committed some secondary violation (i.e., some contact by an ineligible "recruiter") and were therefore obligated to report it, that also makes sense. The root could be the Bond story - that their contact constituted a secondary violation, compelling us to report. That is also fine. We could have assumed that the Newton's were so blatant in their private lottery that we knew this would blow up at some point and approached it that way. Finally, we could have just done it because Cecil is a punk, Auburn is dirty and we wanted to put them in their place - that is fine too, there is nothing wrong with it, but I really have no interest in seeing AU go on probation for 10 years. <div>
</div><div>All I am saying is that I just want to know the answer to those questions. I guess you are right that we could royally screw up a public statement. All I am saying is that I want some more answers relative to our involvement, namely:</div><div>
</div><div>The circumstances surrounding the report to the SEC, what all was provided.</div><div>The circumstances surrounding the breaking of the story last Thursday, the day of Nick's memorial. </div><div>
</div><div>I don't necessarily want to know these things for national vindication, but out of simple curiosity as to how our administration handled this and how we operate. </div>