Freeze can't evaluate talent
- Thread starter jethreauxdawg
- Start date
Correct, I made a mistake and will edit. Point remains the difference is ole miss' upset of lsu.
Last edited:
And you're 11-29 the past five seasons....
Everyone knows your team is inferior, your fan base is inferior, and that you should drop major college sports and learn your place.
And you're winless against Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, Texas A&M, Missouri during this time...and only 7-33 against the SEC West during this time.
Everyone knows your team is inferior, your fan base is inferior, and that you should drop major college sports and learn your place.
By all means he should go after Top 30 players. But he lost credibility when he was just going after weak connections so close to signing day. He was throwing spaghetti against the wall and hope it stuck (as it did with Tun$il).
The sample size is too small, for me, but no he hasn't shown that he can evaluate talent.
Neither has he had time to show he can't, which was the entire premise of the original post. The first class he got to fully evaluate will be sophomores in 2014. There is nothing to support the idea that he can't evaluate talent, yet. He may not be able to. But saying he can't at this point can't be backed up.
somebody's gotta say it
the fact that no elite talent visits MSU has directly resulted in Mullen's ability to evaluate talent. that's still better than nothing but elite talent visiting and Mullen being totally inept in evaluating it.
17'ing genius...can I hire you as a life coach?
the fact that no elite talent visits MSU has directly resulted in Mullen's ability to evaluate talent. that's still better than nothing but elite talent visiting and Mullen being totally inept in evaluating it.
17'ing genius...can I hire you as a life coach?
. You were absolutely wrong about Mississippi being 3 of Msu's wins. Absolutely wrong.
I didn't post that, so no, I wasn't. Wrong again. Try again. Actually, don't, because the likelihood of that being correct is slim to none.
Thank you for repeating
what I just wrote. Nevertheless, the burden of proof is on those who say that he can.
what I just wrote. Nevertheless, the burden of proof is on those who say that he can.
The burden of proof is on anyone who is trying to prove anything. There is not enough evidence to say one way or the other, and lack of evidence on one side does not equal evidence for the other side. No one will know how well the OM staff develops talent until a few more seasons pass.
Last edited:
This is the most State post ever. You are completely incapable of wanting anything other than to beat OM. My point is that you should look at the bigger picture and that is DM can't beat SEC West teams worth a **** other than Ole Miss, and you're completely okay with that. You are the definition of a person who lives in poverty and cares nothing about elevating yourself out of it.
Last edited:
Mutt….You're right! Ole Miss has not beaten Florida in the past five years. Reason is they haven't even played the Gators in past five years. Last time they played was when OM beat Florida in 2008.
So what is your point? I guess you could also say they haven't beaten Notre Dame, Ohio State and even Slippery Rock in the past five years. Imagine… OM can't even beat Slippery Rock. lol
Mutt….you lose whatever credibility you had when you stretch things that bad!
So what is your point? I guess you could also say they haven't beaten Notre Dame, Ohio State and even Slippery Rock in the past five years. Imagine… OM can't even beat Slippery Rock. lol
Mutt….you lose whatever credibility you had when you stretch things that bad!
Last edited:
Your reading comprehension clearly indicates you graduated (possibly) from a low-achieving public school. My post says y'all can beat teams, just not good ones. The only 2 SEC West teams you've ever beaten which finished with a winning record was 2009 and 2013 OM teams. If you include all SEC teams, you'd only get 2 more - 2009 KY and 2010 UF. Freeze has nearly equaled that in 2 years - 2012 State, 2013 LSU, 2013 Vandy.
If we ever go 11-1 with our loss to a 1-11 State, I'd take that every day of the week. By most people's logic on this board, you'd rather have the opposite.
If we ever go 11-1 with our loss to a 1-11 State, I'd take that every day of the week. By most people's logic on this board, you'd rather have the opposite.
Maybe you can add it to your bracket and help prove you aren't obsessed with us.
This is a little off topic but everytime I see you respond to a post, I always read it with the Sterling Archer voice in my head.
Reading Comprehension Fail
Where in that post does it even remotely suggest that all I am worried about is beating OM? If you can point that out (correctly), I'll concede.
You came here talking **** about Mullen's recruiting. My response relays the idea that it's sort of ridiculous for someone that is a fan of a team that has been owned by Mullen to talk **** about his (Mullen) recruiting. Now if some LSU or Alabama fan came on here with your message, I'd have to room to respond in such fashion. Understand, Einstein?
Lastly, it's sort of funny that you're (in a roundabout way) accusing me of being obsessed with OM...you know, with you being the OM fan posting on the MSU board. Then again, when your only other option is nafoom, I don't really blame you. That board is full of idiots.
Where in that post does it even remotely suggest that all I am worried about is beating OM? If you can point that out (correctly), I'll concede.
You came here talking **** about Mullen's recruiting. My response relays the idea that it's sort of ridiculous for someone that is a fan of a team that has been owned by Mullen to talk **** about his (Mullen) recruiting. Now if some LSU or Alabama fan came on here with your message, I'd have to room to respond in such fashion. Understand, Einstein?
Lastly, it's sort of funny that you're (in a roundabout way) accusing me of being obsessed with OM...you know, with you being the OM fan posting on the MSU board. Then again, when your only other option is nafoom, I don't really blame you. That board is full of idiots.
Freeze has matched Mullen's W/L record from his first two years and is one game worse in the SEC. Congrats to Hugh Freeze.
If we compare the first 2 years - Hugh Freeze has beaten the same # of teams in the SEC with a winning record as Dan Mullen - (KY, Florida, and Ole Miss). And Mullen has beaten one more SEC bowl team (UGA 2010).
And trust me - I think most people would take an 11-1 season with a loss to Ole Miss if they are 1-11.
If we compare the first 2 years - Hugh Freeze has beaten the same # of teams in the SEC with a winning record as Dan Mullen - (KY, Florida, and Ole Miss). And Mullen has beaten one more SEC bowl team (UGA 2010).
And trust me - I think most people would take an 11-1 season with a loss to Ole Miss if they are 1-11.
Last edited:
Congrats juthreauxdawg, you musta hit a nerve ... haven't this many rebels on this site since their Eggbowl win in '12
You're
an idiot if you honestly think most on here would rather be 1-11 with the win v OM, compared to 11-1 and losing to them. I'm pretty sure this has been asked a number of times and it's overwhelmingly been chosen for the 11-1 scenario. But hey, WeEZ obseZZEd!
an idiot if you honestly think most on here would rather be 1-11 with the win v OM, compared to 11-1 and losing to them. I'm pretty sure this has been asked a number of times and it's overwhelmingly been chosen for the 11-1 scenario. But hey, WeEZ obseZZEd!
I can't take all the credit
I happened to sit next to what appeared to be some of their bigger boosters at a restaurant last week. They were concerned about Freeze's ability to evaluate talent. I stole a few of my comments from them.
I happened to sit next to what appeared to be some of their bigger boosters at a restaurant last week. They were concerned about Freeze's ability to evaluate talent. I stole a few of my comments from them.
Kurt…. The Bears have only had ONE top recruiting class….this year's freshmen. Nutt had one good recruiting class about three years ago. Was ranked in the high teens (same as our was that same year), but most of theirs never even got to campus or quickly left (Brassell, etc). Realistically I don't see how their one top class (2013 class) could have much to do with the past several years. Solid recruiting doesn't affect the past….only the future. We'll see where these recruiting classes get them in two or three years.