There's alot more to winning games than just class ranking. A good QB is a huge deal. You can have a highly ranked class but if you don't fill positions like CB or linebacker, you're in trouble. Then key injuries can have a huge effect. IF you have a hole in your defense at a couple of positions, good opposition coaches find those weaknesses and exploit them. Then you add in locker room stuff. I suspect there's some issues right now with team chemistry at FSU.
This.
Also, with a lot of highly rated recruits on your roster you also often get a locker room filled with prima donnas. Some coaches are good at handling that and some aren't. And if you are a coach who is not good at it then you will have teams that fluctuate wildly between great and awful, all dependent on how well the players themselves create their own team chemistry. In fact, coaches who are good at getting a locker full of four and five star prima donnas to gel, are good precisely at getting the players themselves to generate the needed unity. But in order for that to happen the players have to like and respect the head coach and that they therefore have a desire to earn that coach's respect in return. Kind of like that great teacher you really liked in school who was kind of a mentor to you and who you did not want to disappoint or let down by turning in shoddy work.
But that is an attitude that begins in the recruiting process. If your recruiting pitch is: "come to our school and we will get you into the NFL" and your emphasis is upon how many of your players are now in the NFL, you are in effect appealing to the narcissism and selfishness inherent in the "star high school athlete" complex. I think this was Callahan's approach and his mistake. And I fear Riley's approach to our offensive recruits might be the same.
Do not misunderstand me here. I am NOT saying stars and talent don't matter. I am NOT saying getting guys into the NFL does not matter. I am NOT saying wanting to get into the NFL isn't a legit aspiration. But it is a question of priorities and what you choose to emphasize.
Make fun of me all you want, but this is one of the big reasons Osborne liked having a strong walk on culture at NU. And having a walk on culture is different from just having walk ons. It has been stated over and over by several former big name players of Osborne's that the presence of that walk on culture, with its work ethic and humility and emphasis upon just having joy in being part of "the team", greatly elevated everyone. You can call that ********, but you would be wrong.
And that brings me to my final point. One of the reasons I lean toward firing Riley is that when I see his teams play I see a group of individuals but not a team. I see no unity or cultural identity. Do his players revere and respect him? Do they want to win for him? I don't know.