Fulton County Election Corruption

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
44,659
33,743
113


To all the liberals who keep saying “the 2020 election wasn’t stolen because the courts already decided it.

Name one case that went to a full evidentiary hearing on the merits,
with witnesses, discovery, and cross-examination.

Not procedural dismissals.
Not standing.
Not timing issues.

An actual trial on the facts.

Name one.

I'll wait.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
44,659
33,743
113


Fulton County spent the last five years with their chests puffed out, arrogantly declaring to the entire country that the 2020 election was the most spotless, pristine, mathematically flawless, incorruptible masterpiece of democracy in the entire history of civilization ... so pure it made the Vatican look like a back-alley poker game run by Tony Soprano.

They told us that those late-night ballot dumps, the mysterious burst pipe that magically cleared the room, and the suitcases of ballots pulled out from under tables at 3 a.m. were all just completely normal, totally above-board things that only conspiracy theorists would dare question. “Nothing to see here,” they sneered, while branding anyone who raised an eyebrow as a dangerous threat to Democracy Itself™.

So you’d think, after all that nonstop bragging about perfection, they’d be thrilled when the Trump DOJ ... via grand jury subpoena ... simply asks for the names, addresses, phone numbers, and emails of the roughly 3,000 election workers and volunteers who actually touched the ballots.

You’d expect them to say, “Absolutely! Here’s the full list. Every single one of us is proud to stand behind our flawless work. Let’s prove once and for all how pristine it all was!”

Instead? Total meltdown.

They immediately hire Hunter Biden’s lawyer, Abbe Lowell, file a frantic 27-page motion to quash the subpoena, scream “political harassment” and “intimidation,” and treat that simple worker list like it’s the Ark of the Covenant, the nuclear launch codes, and the Holy Grail all rolled into one.

If the 2020 election in Fulton County was really that immaculate… why are they fighting like cornered rats to keep the names of the people who counted the votes hidden from federal investigators?

Why does the mere idea of transparency send them into full Enron-mode panic?

After five years of gaslighting the country, the second someone turns on the lights they run for the shadows.

Curious, isn’t it?
(article below)
 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,867
4,314
113
You poor little election denying gump. Trump lost and no crimes were committed nor was there anything that would have changed the election results because T.R.U.M.P L.O.S.T. and Jeff is a lying POS who is trying to fool you. It's been six years you sore loser, get over it.

"but state probes (SOS/GBI) and courts have consistently found no evidence of outcome-altering fraud or criminal intent."

"Partially credible on administrative errors and procedural issues, but overstated on "thousands of fake hand count entries," widespread fraud, or proven intent to alter results. The core claims mix verified procedural lapses in Fulton County (Georgia's largest and often chaotic county) with interpretations that state investigations and audits repeatedly rejected as not impacting the certified 2020 outcome.

Key Facts on the SEB CasesSEB Case 2021-181 (tied to Joe Rossi's complaint): This stemmed from Rossi's analysis of the Risk-Limiting Audit (RLA) hand count data. Investigators (including referrals involving Gov. Kemp's office) confirmed 36 inconsistencies in batch tally sheets and data entry into the Arlo system used for the audit. These arose from human errors like misidentifying/duplicating batch data during a high-volume process.

A consent order between Fulton County and the SEB acknowledged a prima facie case for these data entry issues. Fulton admitted errors but investigators attributed them to human error, not intentional misconduct. The errors were described as a small fraction of total votes and did not affect the election results, which multiple counts (machine recount, hand audit/RLA) confirmed.

SEB Case 2023-025 (Rossi/Moncla): Focused on recount/tabulation issues, including alleged double-scanned ballots (around 3,000+ images in some claims). State investigators substantiated some double-scanning and poor batch management during the recount (exacerbated by COVID absentee volume and time pressures). A letter of reprimand was issued to Fulton, and monitors were discussed.

However, reports explicitly stated these did not affect the accuracy of the final results, which were confirmed by the RLA and full recounts. Some complainant calculations were found incorrect or based on non-tally records.

Joe Rossi's role: Rossi (a private citizen) drove much of the documentation on audit discrepancies and presented evidence to the SEB. His work prompted investigations and the consent order. A week before the January 2026 FBI raid, he reportedly presented on intent. This is factual in terms of activity, but state probes (SOS/GBI) and courts have consistently found no evidence of outcome-altering fraud or criminal intent.

Broader Context on ClaimsDouble-scanned ballots and hand count issues:
Real procedural problems existed in Fulton (e.g., batch management, data entry). Performance reviews noted double-scanning "should never happen" but tied it to operational failures, not fraud. Net effects were minimal/negligible and sometimes even favored Trump in analyzed subsets. Multiple statewide audits, hand recounts, and certifications (including by Republican officials like Brad Raffensperger) confirmed Biden's win margin.

"Fake" entries/intent:
No credible evidence from official investigations supports "fake" ballots or deliberate fraud flipping results. Claims often rely on discrepancies in images/tallies that audits reconciled. The FBI raid and DOJ subpoena (2026) appear tied to re-examining these under the Trump administration, citing prior SEB complaints—but mainstream and state reviews label many as previously investigated/debunked or non-impactful. Fulton is challenging the subpoena as harassment.


Ruby Freeman/Shaye Moss:
Unrelated to these specific SEB cases. Long-debunked "suitcase" video claims of them double-scanning were cleared by investigations (no fraud; normal procedures after observers left). They faced harassment; Giuliani was found liable for defamation.

Overall assessment: There were documented sloppiness and errors in Fulton County's 2020 processes—enough for reprimands and consent agreements. This fuels legitimate oversight concerns about election administration. However, the leap to "thousands of fake" entries proving systemic fraud/intent has not been substantiated by state investigations, audits, or courts. These issues were litigated and certified years ago. The 2026 federal actions revive them in a politically charged context, but they rest on the same evidence that prior probes found insufficient for overturning results.

For primary sources, review the SEB consent order, investigation reports, and performance reviews from sos.ga.gov. Election administration in large urban counties is imperfect nationwide, but Georgia's multi-layered checks held.

I'm impressed at how definitive you are in your analysis that everything in Georgia was so above board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing

Allornothing

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
11,384
12,342
113


🚨 BREAKING: FULTON COUNTY FRAUD PROBE JUST GOT A MASSIVE GREEN LIGHT!


Federal Judge just SLAMMED the door on Fulton County Democrats desperate motion to snatch back 600+ boxes of 2020 election records seized by the FBI in January.


Ballots, tabulator tapes, ballot images, voter rolls (the original evidence from ground zero of the steal) stays with the Feds for full forensic review.


After years of stonewalling, lawfare, and "nothing to see here," the deep state’s hiding spot just got raided.


No more "lost" chain-of-custody.


No more Ruby Freeman/Shaye Moss suitcase videos dismissed as conspiracy.


What happens next?


Grand jury already seated.


Names of every election worker demanded.


Real scrutiny of duplicate scans, unsecured ballots, and the infamous "pipe burst" that paused counting.


POSSIBLE RESULTS:


Smoking gun fraud exposed → Indictments for election workers/officials under 52 USC (preservation violations + voter deprivation).


Systemic irregularities confirmed → Proof of procedural sabotage in the most corrupt county in GA.


Fuels national election integrity bills, voter ID mandates, paper ballots only, and mass decertification pressure.


Cover-up confirmed → If they "find" nothing after fighting this hard? Even bigger red flag.


The same crew that weaponized Fani Willis’ RICO circus is now under the microscope.


WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FBI WILL FIND?


@FBIDirectorKash

If there was no fraud, why fight so hard against proving there was no fraud.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,187
22,661
113
If there was no fraud, why fight so hard against proving there was no fraud.
If there was significant fraud, you would have found it years ago, you wouldn't be turning over every rock six years later in hopes of finding a pebble that won't change the outcome. Especially for an election that we've already done multiple proctology exams on. If you had a moral compass, you'd be pissed at this never-ending witch hunt that will never end until he finds what he won't or we lock him up for this crime spree.
 
Mar 8, 2010
6,993
13,670
113


To all the liberals who keep saying “the 2020 election wasn’t stolen because the courts already decided it.

Name one case that went to a full evidentiary hearing on the merits,
with witnesses, discovery, and cross-examination.

Not procedural dismissals.
Not standing.
Not timing issues.

An actual trial on the facts.

Name one.

I'll wait.

Because they were tossed out for being absolutely ridiculous junk.

I'm still waiting for anything approaching the semblance of plasuible evidence.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
44,659
33,743
113


Gabriel Sterling,


1) When did you first learn of the fake hand count entries in Fulton that provided Biden a fake net gain of 4,000? (SEB case 2021-181).


2) When did you first learn that thousands of ballots were double scanned, which provide another net gain to Biden? (SEB 2023-025). Why didn't you and @GaSecofState investigate the 8,000+ double scanned ballots across the state after @mad_liberals testified to this in the hearing that followed 2023-025? And this 8,000+ was from less than half the counties because digital records were destroyed.


3) Why did you testify to the J6 Committee and tell them that the hand count matched the machine count and that no ballots were double scanned? This was false information.


4) Did you cover up the above information because you had received a $200,000 private contract to implement the Dominion Voting System?


5) How did private citizens discover the above evidence and prove it in SEB cases while you, @GaSecofState, and @Georgia_Ag failed to identify and disclose this information to the public?


6) Why did your office meet with European Union diplomats in Atlanta just prior to the 2020 election?


7) When you traveled to Europe following the 2020 election did your receive any money from foreign sources? If so, was this money received from organizations linked to USAID in any way?