With the right personnel and match up combinations, I could look good as a DC. Nix has issues with the same types of offenses, even when he has better personnel, because he's not good at adjusting.
It becomes even more glaring if his personnel can't overcome his lack of coaching ability for him.
I was down on Nix as far back as the middle of the 2008 season at times, because he couldn't adjust. Having a dominating front 4 and some solid experience in the back 7 allowed for him to get around that.
I've watched us all year slant our front 4 without sliding anyone back outside for contain, and it burns us over and over. That's not a personnel issue. When we run into a read option team, any read option team, Nix doesn't understand that he can't keep using the aggressive, attack approach. It's clear we have no concept of assignments on defense. Our defense is a mix of stunts and blitzes. We mix that up, and that's about it. Same approach every game regardless of the opponent or the offense. Past that, we either get lucky, or we have enough talent to make plays in spite of our coaching.
The option works well against us because we don't sit back and wait on it, and we won't this weekend. Watch. We'll attack attack, and just open holes for Relf and your RBs to run through by playing too aggressive. It's the same problem LSU had against us. We ran all over them, and it sure as hell wasn't because Jared Duke and AJ Hawkins were dominating Drake Nevis and Kelvin Sheppard. It's because they were over-aggressive, which you can't be against a read option team. LSU is just in a spot where they still have enough talent to overcome it most times.
So yes, our talent drop off has something to do with the fact that Nix's deficincies are being exposed, but the deficincies have been there from the outset.
As far as the recruiting goes, isn't Derrick Nix the one that's the good recruiter? I didn't think Tyrone did a whole lot on the recruiting trail. I could be wrong on that.