Good morning all,
So, as I am wont to do, I will share my two cents:
Believe me, I am very sympathetic to people who are skeptical of Riley and have kind of a downer perspective on the state of the program; we went from being a traditional powerhouse to getting our asses kicked for the last 15 years, with very few bright spots in between. There are some very key reasons for this:
1.) Devaney and then Osborne were nothing if not a model of consistency and continuity. They built a strong program with a unique identity specifically designed to emphasize regional strengths and diminish program weaknesses. Unfortunately, because Osborne was so integral to how that all worked (with his assistance, offensive philosophy, etc), that after him, a huge void opened up after the firing of Solich, the guy who was kind of continuing that perspective.
2.) Steve Petersen basically destroyed our program, as did Texas, the Big 12, and a whole lot of chaos that happened during the Callahan years. I see that as a very wealthy, traditionally good program was taken over by people who did not understand it or how to bring it forward into a new CFB era.
3.) They then righted the ship by hiring Pelini, who was a real hardass and a gruff, unlikable guy, but who could at least restore a bit of stability to the program. As Osborne himself said, Pelini rescued the program from a complete tailspin.
4.) Well, Pelini did do that, but he also refused to hold his assistants accountable for much, change things that were not working, or make proper adjustments when the team would be challenged by a program that really had thought out how to out-coach Pelini. That Big 10 title game against Wisconsin is a perfect example of it; Wisconsin threw everything but the kitchen sink at us, and it confused the players and Pelini refused to react. Thus, a terrible, terrible loss, which in my mind, highlighted why he had to go. That, and honestly, I don't think he recruited very well.
So, the new regime really is fixing pretty much everything about Point 4 that was wrong with Pelini's approach; happier demeanor, positive attitude, some of the best recruiting this program has seen in over a decade, and a willingness to engage with both the fans and the media that was also not something Pelini was known for. Finally, I know a 6-7 record isn't awesome, but there are 3-4 games there that were just bad, bad luck. The national sports press knows it, and there is very little Riley could have done about it (you could argue he should never have been that close with, say, Illinois, but you get my point). It would be foolish to fire a coach so soon, or even really talk about it; in my opinion, coaches need 3-4 years to really implement their systems and be given a good shot at being successful. If you fire a guy before that, you're sending a message to all other good coaches that it's a very volatile place to be. Win instantly (which is very hard to do) or you're axed. We don't want that.
So, Riley was not my first pick, but the program is trending up and the vibe is VERY different. Give the guy some time to have success. We've been getting our asses kicked for a while now; a few more times while the ship is being repaired and righted doesn't bother me any.
Cheers all, and here's to an 8-4 or better season!