He is not say that. Instead, he correctly said that PR is not the best team in the state.
Huh? That's exactly what he said. "Naz handed the game to them."
Not sure how that statement can be taken any other way except Greatgig's interpretation of the statement as "...they (PR) shouldn’t have won because Naz beat themselves." I'd be curious as to what other interpretation one could come to form a statement that "Naz handed the game to them" other than "Naz beat themselves".
Moreover, to call PR a "one man show" is laughable. I challenge the OP to say that to Jeff Jenkins' face.
Is it possible or even likely that the 7A or 8A champ is better than the 6A champ? Of course. Sorry, but that's sort of a "Captain Obvious statement", it's exactly why we have a system from 1A up through 8A based on enrollment (larger pool of players to work with) and move those that dominate at one level up based on "multipliers". I mean, that's the whole system. Unless I'm missing something as I'm not on this board that much, it's like belittling Clemson's championship last year by saying they weren't that great because Alabama just beat themselves in the championship, and besides Clemson's not that great as the Patriots would kill them.
Yes, the team at higher levels are generally better. It does't belittle a team's chamionship at their own level.