in the next 3-5 years. I've seen enough OM and MSU football to be fairly certain that neither team can stand much success over a long period.
1) I don't care what they would dispute. They're in the mental minority, like you.Johnson85 said:First, there are a lot of students and recent graduatesfrom UM law that would disputethat theonly reason they don't have jobs isthat they haven't networked.
Second, your and dubmass regarding the "average" salary of $50k. Salaries of law school graduates are bi-modal. You have a small cluster of people that make agreat salary out of law school, then a second, much larger grouping that is below themean, but basically contains the median. In other words,a plot of the distribution ofgraduate salaries doesn't look like a bell curve, but has two "humps" (I'm simplifying so you can understand). Soa $50k average is useless information to most people. They need to know what the median is, what the top distribution is, andto have a reasonable guess as to whether they think they will be in that top grouping, or (more likely) in the grouping below the average. So when you considermost law school students did reasonably well in undergrad and could have gotten a decent job after college,foregoing three years of income (and probably paying tuition) in order to get a job somewhere south of $50k doesn't look that great.
Third, howyou define mid-career matters.I'm guessing theypick a number of years into the profession (or maybeinclude people that have practiced between X and X+5 years). One thing I doknow is your definition is wrong,as there's no way toknow who is really half-way through their career. Butagain, assuming that most law schoolgraduates had a fairly high aptitute, it's not unreasonable toexpect lots of them would have been successful in another field, without giving up three years of income to go to lawschool and without (for a lot of them) working ****** hours.
1) Jobs don't come to you. I'm sure you realize that, Ijake taylor said:As
a current third year law student at Ole Miss, I can guarantee that it's
alot worse than you even realize. First off, out of the current
classabout to graduateit's estimated that only between 5-15% of the
class has a job or any type of interest period.
With that being
said, I will go ahead and cut you off and admit that I don't have a job,
so if you want to just classify me as a disgruntled law student who
just didn't network or put any effort into it, go ahead.
1)NewTweederEndzoneDance said:You
very obviously have less than 0% of an idea of what you are talking
about. As a fairly recent graduate of a Mississippi law school, I can
tell you without a doubt that students are not graduating from law
school with jobs right now. As someone with a job in the legal market in
Mississippi, I can tell you without a doubt that law firms are not
hiring at anything resembling the same rate they used to in the past. I
can also tell you that attorneys are retiring later and later due to the
fact that they need to keep working so that they can continue to live
the lifestyle that they and their families are accustomed to.
I don't know where you got your "knowledge", but it obviously wasn't gained firsthand from experience.
I'd love to live in your world, where apparently I'd be making all sorts of money simply because I have a law degree.
Thanks for the rationality in a post.MTNDawg said:I am
also a law student at Ole Miss and the job market is tough. That said,
the 5-15% that graduate with jobs is a little misleading. Unless you are
in the top 20% you do not typically find a job until after you pass the
bar. With that in mind, most of my friends graduated over the last two
years without jobs. After passing the bar, each of them had a job within
3 months in the city of their choice as an attorney or in a judicial
clerkship. None of these students were top 30% in their class.
If
you do well in school and are flexible (ex. refuse to work anywhere but
Oxford) the jobs are still out there. The difference is the amount of
networking necessary and the hours required to find the jobs that are
not posted. That is a stark contrast to my exit from engineering at
State with 7 job offers and a sub 3 GPA. Regardless, no first year
attorney is making $160k in Mississippi or Tennessee unless they fit a
niche and have unprecedented work experience. The starting salaries for
the big boys range from $85 - 110k.
1) Yea, I definitely said "there are plenty of jobs for law students who are not dumbasses". Yea, direct quote there. Sorry, that's not even a paraphrase of what I said. Did you graduate from law school? You must have a reading comprehension problem. As far as things not being rosy, no ****. Do you think the medical profession is rosy? There's not a $#+%$*# job in America that's "rosy". Those are your words, not mine. I'm painting a realistic picture. You're on the turnip truck to hell with this, almost nobody can find a job, doom and gloom horse ****. Yea, this is all about who's smart and as far as painting broad brushes, pot meet kettle. Do you really believe that few of your class mates are finding jobs. What an absurd generalization. You've got to be on drugs.NewTweederEndzoneDance said:You spend half this thread talking about how there are plenty of jobs and law students who are not dumbasses should have no problems finding a job. Then in response to me, you completely reverse yourself and say that the market isn't "rosy".
I'm not sure you have done anything here other than paint the broadest strokes possible so you can fit your argument into it and further you own opinion that you are actually smart.
"Keep in mind though, after 2 years of grad, 100% of Law graduates have jobs or are furthering education." - jobs doing what? so 100% of law graduates aren't homeless bums within 2 years of law school, great stat.
"1) Quoting me an article from the Arkansas times with a small sample size will not prove your point. Wrong." - so you challenge people to show you stats and back up their points and then trash it when they do. Where exactly do you get your stats anyway? You do realize that any stat or number can be manipulated to fit into different arguments, right? You say that your figures are better because they are from the official US Labor cite or wherever, and then immediately move into a point about how we're not talking about places other than the South. Nice, very nice.
"1) I don't care what they would dispute. They're in the mental minority, like you." - damn, you really got him there.
Hey, I like to come online and pretend to be a badass from time to time too, so I'm alright with this thread.
Thanks for the correction. As far as your editorialized drivel, I have no idea what to make of it either.State82 said:cutting-edge
mathematics skills? UM? I'm pretty sure that 15,000 jobs lost out of
779,000 is almost 2.0%, not almost 0.01%. Just saying. All that other
drivel, I have no idea.