Not even close. Purdue, Northwestern, Indiana, Maryland, Michigan State for starters. You smokin crack?
Bart attempts to quantify this with his PORPAGATU! stat. You can see RU’s guys at the bottom of the team page.
So basically no difference between Hyatt and mag and under a point between Caleb and oskar
Doubt we are as bad as #100. Even Pike's first team at Rutgers was #72 defensively. Hell, 5 out of his 9 Stony Brook teams were better than #100 defensively. Obviously lol sample but the 95.8 we put up against Wisconsin for adj defensive efficiency would be #30 or 31.
Caleb’s defense is no doubt undervalued. It’s harder to pull out of the available stats.
115th nationally…149th offensively, 99th defensively.
Dude, you thinking Wisconsin was our third best win this season simply shows you are a bandwagon fan who probably heard the RU recruiting buzz of late. Anyone who has watched Rutgers this year knows that beating the worst Wisconsin team in maybe 25 years isn't our 3rd best win all season.
It was absolutely our third best win after Purdue and northwestern. Not even debatable really.
And it's 3 okay games with one REALLY awful game. And the really awful game we had Caleb.
It's pretty debatable. What makes it better than an Indiana home win?
I “remembered” some attempt to inject some defense into it, but there’s clearly no reference to it in that archive.org cached page.
Indiana isn’t a good road team and was missing hood schifino (their second best player). The difference between a home and road game in the big ten is huge. If you want to say Indiana was a better win, I disagree but go ahead. Don’t try to tell me Maryland or mich state at home we’re better wins though.
We have 7 wins against teams with a higher NET
Wow. That says it all. Wisconsin our third best win "not even debatable." Lord Almighty.
Maryland is 2-7 on the road. Lol gtfoh saying that was a better win than at Wisconsin. Also even brining up Ohio state because of net just shows how much you’re reaching.
This guy bashes me constantly and yet our stats align perfectly. Your Wisconsin "Top 3 Win" is outrageous. Only someone with no knowledge of Rutgers and the conference in general would make such an asinine claim.
You're really going to try to parse out exactly how good/bad a team is "on the road" from a 9 game sample. C'mon man, you're overthinking it.
We both know beating Maryland at home is not more impressive than beating Wisconsin on the road. Why are you fighting that? They’re 2-7 on the road dude.
Maryland is NET 24. Wisconsin is 76.
You might be right but it's certainly not "not debatable". I think Indiana is more debatable than Maryland.
It might have been our most unexpected! Even more so than Purdue. At least from my perspective.
Winning at Wisconsin is harder than beating Maryland at home. That just a fact dude. Do you watch big ten basketball? You’re honestly trying to downplay the difference between home and away games? Also if Wisconsin moves up 1 spot it’s a quad 1 win so you won’t even be able to use that flimsy argument anymore.
Yes, that's what I mean.
