Wild overreactions - "umm... well, this is awkward" edition:
- multiple things that are true:
1. We were down our starting and (apparently) backup PG. BTW I'm not sure I had Aberdeen as our backup lead ball-handler, but maybe he'll do fine there over the course of the season. Looked fine against Purdue.
2. We shot poorly from 3, and while I haven't seen the advanced stats, by my count Georgetown shot 98.574% on tough midrange twos.
3. That was still an unacceptably bad performance in multiple facets. I know it's an exhibition, but I'm getting pretty tired of having embarrassing losses. And exhibition or not, getting run off the court at home by Georgetown definitely qualifies.
I'll go roughly in order of my concerns.
- Our guys looked like they didn't know that teams were allowed to play defense against them. Standing around, settling for early jumpers outside the flow of the offense, not cutting hard, and, worst of all, lazy turnover after lazy turnover. The physicality really, really, really bothered them. Guess what we're going to see every night in the SEC?
- um... are we sure we're going to have a good defense? I understand that Aberdeen and JQ are going to help significantly, but our complete inability to defend a simple ball screen was mind bottling. There was a play in the second half when we cut it to 10, they ran a PnR with Garrison's man at the top of the key, and Garrison just.... stayed up and tried to double team the guard. Even though our defender (think it was Johnson) actually got through the screen, which left Chandler on an island with the much bigger roll man... and predictably he gave up an and-one. Ballgame effectively over.
Is that scheme or personnel? Guessing the latter, given who was involved. We also did this sort of thing against Purdue a few times and got away with it because their bigs outside TKR are not as athletic.
- Rebounding, which looked great against Purdue, was pretty bad.
- Generally speaking,we just seem to periodically have an absolute clunker where we look like we have never picked up a basketball before and are shocked that we're supposed to play a game that day. Ohio State last year was an example, but there were others. BYU fans will tell you that Pope teams have a few of those a year. I'm not saying that's going to be a trend going forward, but... it had better not be.
- I'm not really that concerned about shooting percentages. It may or may not be good going forward, but coming into the season I thought that while this team may not shoot as well as last year's, it would hopefully make up for it by having a better shot diet - more 3s in the flow of the offense generated by the improvements in athleticism, more rim runs, more lobs, more free throws, etc. That remains to be seen.
- Moreno is going to struggle to defend multiple actions. Georgetown exploited that big time.
- Not going to pile on Garrison any more, but suffice it to say that I have concerns. Processing is not a skill that tends to improve significantly year-over-year.
- Thought Dioubate looked good and was up for the physicality. That's about all I have to say that's positive about that game.