Hall and Mitchell update

[Wildcat_in_DC]

I had already made peace with the team we have, I do think you take the highest character of the 3, best chance of keeping or adding to good chemistry. Any chance of a kid disrupting the locker room just pass and go with what you got.

This needs to be like the movie draft day, deep dive into his character before you agree to anything.

this is my take unless the staff knows something we dont about kam's injury.

 

[Son_Of_Saul]

this is my take unless the staff knows something we dont about kam's injury.

Kam's foot injury is going to linger on. Jones fractures are hard to heal and if I'm the staff I'm not counting on Kam Williams to be there when he's needed. The upside of Kohler is that you add him and he meets almost all the needs of this team in one player, including allowing Milan to move to the 3 spot so we don't get abused on the glass in the SEC. Hawthorne backs up Milan. The rotation wouldn't even need Kam. If he's healthy, fine. If not, you can still compete for a Final Four.

 

[bnewt5]

This team won’t have trouble scoring without Hall. Problem is they’ll need to score 105 to beat the good teams given how bad they’ll be defensively.

Exactly
Hall can add 20 points most games to get the win

 

[bnewt5]

I agree but it does work if you consider Hall a 3. He averages 7 boards a game

More than anyone did last year

 

[Eagles_Ball_69]

Kam's foot injury is going to linger on. Jones fractures are hard to heal and if I'm the staff I'm not counting on Kam Williams to be there when he's needed. The upside of Kohler is that you add him and he meets almost all the needs of this team in one player, including allowing Milan to move to the 3 spot so we don't get abused on the glass in the SEC. Hawthorne backs up Milan. The rotation wouldn't even need Kam. If he's healthy, fine. If not, you can still compete for a Final Four.

Spot on. I think Mitchell provides the same. Less bulk but more athleticism, all in all a net wash. Assuming Kepnang is healthy, my only concern (if Mitchell or Kohler were added) would be backcourt depth. There’s just not much behind Diallo or Wilkins. I don’t think either are all SEC capable, but they’re serviceable. No great, but probably good. I don’t buy the hype on Mason Williams and Morton is super limited. That’s about all there is. It just seems so easy to build guard depth, but Pope never seems to do it. In his first two yrs I’ve seen Travis Perry and Colin Chandler play PG for extended periods. Oof.

 

[ThreeDogNight2]

Spot on. I think Mitchell provides the same. Less bulk but more athleticism, all in all a net wash. Assuming Kepnang is healthy, my only concern (if Mitchell or Kohler were added) would be backcourt depth. There’s just not much behind Diallo or Wilkins. I don’t think either are all SEC capable, but they’re serviceable. No great, but probably good. I don’t buy the hype on Mason Williams and Morton is super limited. That’s about all there is. It just seems so easy to build guard depth, but Pope never seems to do it. In his first two yrs I’ve seen Travis Perry and Colin Chandler play PG for extended periods. Oof.

Guards
zoom, Wilkins, Noah, Morton,Mason,Zyon

Pf/C
Ndiaye,Moreno, Kepnang, Reese

I’d say PF/C is what we need more, you dont
need a ton of ball dominant scoring gaurds

 

[ScWildcat3]

Guards
zoom, Wilkins, Noah, Morton,Mason,Zyon

Pf/C
Ndiaye,Moreno, Kepnang, Reese

I’d say PF/C is what we need more, you dont
need a ton of ball dominant scoring gaurds

Wilkins and Zoom aren’t just ball dominant scoring guards. Can they score yes but their assist rates are also high.

 

[Eagles_Ball_69]

Guards
zoom, Wilkins, Noah, Morton,Mason,Zyon

Pf/C
Ndiaye,Moreno, Kepnang, Reese

I’d say PF/C is what we need more, you dont
need a ton of ball dominant scoring gaurds

Two of your four guards can’t play. The other two, at best, are probably extremely limited. I agree you don’t need a bunch of ball dominant guards, but you’ve got to have some that can fill minutes and not have a huge drop off…Also agree, the need is a 4 like Kohler or Mitchell. I just simply said guard depth would be my only concern. Every team has concerns.

 

[TheResistance]

 

[ScWildcat3]

Best news of the day.

 

[MidseasonTweak]

Best news of the day.

I know the locker room potential problems were noted by some, I wonder if that was the main reason? Otherwise he put great stats in the SEC.

 

[ScWildcat3]

I know the locker room potential problems were noted by some, I wonder if that was the main reason? Otherwise he put great stats in the SEC.

I don’t worry about the locker room so much. It’s the fit. He’s a bully ball get his type guy and although he can score and make plays just don’t like the fit with how the team is constructed. I would def take him but Kohler is the way better fit and need. Mitchell would be next.

 

[PastorofMuppets82]

Not all stats are built the same too. We already know that mid major ppg game averages don't translate well to P4 ppg averages due to the jump in skill level of competition. There's also a difference though in high ppg on garbage teams verses high ppg on stacked teams. And we often get caught up in that when comparing players.

Anthony Davis looks solid but pedestrian (14 ppg and 10 boards) against Keyshawn Hall's (19 ppg and 7 boards) as a "scorer" both in the same league in a vacuum of just using stats and conference/level. Your stats can be deceiving if you are the only scoring option on a bad team carrying the load, verses a skilled player with multiple scoring threats around you sharing the load, verses stopping you being the entire opponents game plan. Context matters.