Right here is the problem in a nutshell - History does not indicate Banker can coach up a championship defense in fact outside of a year or two his defense stink and last year was no exception. Now we are making excuses why to start the year he puts CB on an island that cant cover his man - what he could not see this before? It was stupid and cost us some games.
You are right Riley will go as Banker goes, I think Riley will do ok on offense but defense will be the issue
Yes Banker didn't have a championship D at OSU. But guess what, Bo didn't win 9 games at Youngstown State. Meyer didn't win a championship at Utah. Saban didn't win one at MSU. Erickson didn't win one at Idaho, Oregon State, or Arizona State. Coker couldn't make UTSA a national power after winning a title with one of the greatest teams in history with 01 Miami.
You want to know why???? Not all programs are created equal. For the 20 some years before Riley got to OSU, they won like 20% of their games. But apparently you think anyone with a whistle could go to Corvallis and build a power?
Under your rationalle, in 1940 had the USA been in WW2, we could have put Eisenhower, Bradley, and Patton in charge of the Belgium defenses, and somehow they'd defeat the German Blitzkrieg, but in reality, they'd have been killed or captured. Had they escaped, someone like you would ***** that you couldn't let those idiots lead forces on the western front.
Is Banker perfect? No, but offensive turnovers and lack of production was a huge impact on some of those losses. But you are just so he'll bent on Banker bashing that facts don't matter.