you said this...
"The slightest drop off in recruiting for us will result in us going back to the days of 4-12 SEC records. Getting rid of Rick right now will most assuredly hurt recruiting"
and youalso said this....
" We have played a SWAC schedule because we have a SWAC team right now. No amount of coaching is going to make Twany Beckham into Dee Bost or Wendell Lewis into Renardo Sidney. As much as some of you like to dog Benock, the sumbitch is the best option we have at shooting guard by a country mile. What does that tell you"
So, to summarize- we couldnt get rid of "The Recruiter" because he recruits so well, yet minus Sidney and Bost, we have a SWAC team? How good is he really recruiting then? I hear that we never have NBA talent- so how good is he really recruiting?
Now then...you also said this:
"You can't fire a guy who continually goes 23-11 or so every year. I am not saying that is some kind of impressive feat but it is not horrible either. The risk of ruining where we are now is not worth it to me but that is just my opinion."
When you examine our OOC this year and the previous 5 years- it's damn near impossible to go 16-14. We play 14-15 games OOC each year, And at least 10 of those a season are against very sub-par teams. Our SOS is near the bottom of the SEC every season. Then to add to that, the SEC West is probably the weakest group of teams of all the BCS conferences. You knock Andy Kennedy so much- but he averages 20 wins also, and has 2 SEC West titles. Why should he be fired and not Stansbury?
And if your reply is because of our 2 NCAA Tourneys the last 5 seasons- thats fine. But what happens when we win 20 games this year and dont make the Tourney? Do we continue status quo?
And if you reply yes, we keep "The Recruiter" because of his incoming recruiting class- then do you agree John Pelphrey deserves to continue at Arkansas because of his top 5 in the nation recruiting class?
"The slightest drop off in recruiting for us will result in us going back to the days of 4-12 SEC records. Getting rid of Rick right now will most assuredly hurt recruiting"
and youalso said this....
" We have played a SWAC schedule because we have a SWAC team right now. No amount of coaching is going to make Twany Beckham into Dee Bost or Wendell Lewis into Renardo Sidney. As much as some of you like to dog Benock, the sumbitch is the best option we have at shooting guard by a country mile. What does that tell you"
So, to summarize- we couldnt get rid of "The Recruiter" because he recruits so well, yet minus Sidney and Bost, we have a SWAC team? How good is he really recruiting then? I hear that we never have NBA talent- so how good is he really recruiting?
Now then...you also said this:
"You can't fire a guy who continually goes 23-11 or so every year. I am not saying that is some kind of impressive feat but it is not horrible either. The risk of ruining where we are now is not worth it to me but that is just my opinion."
When you examine our OOC this year and the previous 5 years- it's damn near impossible to go 16-14. We play 14-15 games OOC each year, And at least 10 of those a season are against very sub-par teams. Our SOS is near the bottom of the SEC every season. Then to add to that, the SEC West is probably the weakest group of teams of all the BCS conferences. You knock Andy Kennedy so much- but he averages 20 wins also, and has 2 SEC West titles. Why should he be fired and not Stansbury?
And if your reply is because of our 2 NCAA Tourneys the last 5 seasons- thats fine. But what happens when we win 20 games this year and dont make the Tourney? Do we continue status quo?
And if you reply yes, we keep "The Recruiter" because of his incoming recruiting class- then do you agree John Pelphrey deserves to continue at Arkansas because of his top 5 in the nation recruiting class?