I'd rather have a general that wins. Then again, I'm not a racist piece of ****. Sad!General Robert E. Lee
Happy Lee, Jackson day![]()
Typical liberal name caller. I guess if he were black it would be OK. IdiotI'd rather have a general that wins. Then again, I'm not a racist piece of ****. Sad!
I think it's disgusting and pitiful because the man led an armed insurrection against my nation! The ONLY General Lee I have any respect for straightened curves and flattened hills!Typical liberal name caller. I guess if he were black it would be OK. Idiot
Such a loser, worst general ever.General Robert E. Lee
Happy Lee, Jackson day![]()
[roll]Loser loves a loser. Btw, he looks somewhat "special" in that pic.General Robert E. Lee
Happy Lee, Jackson day![]()
Well, you one upped the original poster on idiocy....let's see who else joins the competition.Happy Birthday, General Lee!
![]()
That dude is a fan of Michigan AND Marshall. His idiocy was well established before this thread.Well, you one upped the original poster on idiocy....let's see who else joins the competition.
Sure......I don't know how many "great generals" get outfoxed and beaten by a drunk. Lee was a traitor.General Robert E. Lee
Happy Lee, Jackson day![]()
You certainly do not know much about the history of the Civil War. Lee lost because of industry and man power. Not out foxed.Sure......I don't know how many "great generals" get outfoxed and beaten by a drunk. Lee was a traitor.
General Robert E. Lee
Happy Lee, Jackson day![]()
Stonewall Jackson was a better general than Lee. His death really turned around the war. Lee's decisions at Gettysburg (thank goodness) destroyed the South's ability to stay in the war.
Patton was better.
Stonewall was already dead by the Battle of Gettysburg. He received his name, Stonewall, by another confederate general, based on him standing his ground during the Battle of Bull Run in 1861. It had nothing to do with him being afraid to attack.I read somewhere that Jackson was supposed to attacked but failed to do so. Lee pointed out that "there stands Jackson like a stonewall". Not pushing the attack and that led people to call him stonewall Jackson.
lol. You are pretty easily duped.I read somewhere that Jackson was supposed to attacked but failed to do so. Lee pointed out that "there stands Jackson like a stonewall". Not pushing the attack and that led people to call him stonewall Jackson.
Patton was my man. Read a great book about this incredible general. But given the magnitude of his duties, the stakes on the line and our victory, you have to give it to Ike. But without Patton, we suffer many, many more losses.
But a WV man, who attended WVU. played a huge role in Patton's success at the Battle of the Bulge. General Anthony McAuliffe held the critical city of Bastogne while surrounded and greatly outnumbered by the Germans. It gave Patton the critical time he needed and Major General Hugh Gaffney arrived in time to secure the city.
The Germans had earlier sent a few men to demand surrender of McAuliffe and his men. McAuliffe never cursed. His simple reply to the German messengers was "Nuts.". The Germans were confused about that response, so one of McAuliffe's aide's interpreted the message. He told the Germans to go to hell.
You certainly do not know much about the history of the Civil War. Lee lost because of industry and man power. Not out foxed.
Sure I do.....thats why I was able to make that assessment.You certainly do not know much about the history of the Civil War. Lee lost because of industry and man power. Not out foxed.
I have Patton's book, War as I knew it. He never wanted to attack at Bastogne. He wanted to attack due north, cut off what was left of the German army and rip it to shreds with combined air and ground power. By going backward to Bastogne, the German army changed direction and went back to germany to be fought for the next 4 months, prolonging the war. He said that Mcauliffe got the DSM for getting surrounded, Patton said he did not get a DSM for saving his butt. those are Patton's words. Paton said that a force as big as the german's did not retreat, it just changed directions. In his book, there were codes for where the attack was to be commenced since the German's were listening to phone conversations. The code for the Bastogne attack was, Don't forget to take Willie for a walk. His dog was named willie.
You certainly do not know much about the history of the Civil War. Lee lost because of industry and man power. Not out foxed.
General Jackson’s Earns The Nickname "Stonewall"lol. You are pretty easily duped.
Once Bastogne was surrounded, Patton had to act. He could not let the American soldiers be captured and/or killed or let the Germans recapture the harbor of Antwerp. Gaffney arrived with the 3rd Armored Force to free Bastogne. The Germans wanted the harbor at Antwerp and Bastogne was key to taking back that harbor from American forces. The Germans hoped to mute American air power by recapturing the harbor. Thus Bastogne was integral to their plans.
Stonewall was already dead by the Battle of Gettysburg. He received his name, Stonewall, by another confederate general, based on him standing his ground during the Battle of Bull Run in 1861. It had nothing to do with him being afraid to attack.
Again, I have his book, do you? He thought the prudent military maneuver was to end the war. Cutting the final part of the German army off and killing it would end the war for the Americans. Patton was more astute in how to fight and end a battle than those who seemed to prolong it. If you think about it, German air power was done. If the damn English had close Felise Gap, that would have shortened the war.
General Robert E. Lee
Happy Lee, Jackson day![]()
You certainly do not know much about the history of the Civil War. Lee lost because of industry and man power. Not out foxed.
Yep Lee screwed the pooch at Gettysburg...he was desperate for a win that far North...he should have left the field after the 2nd day.No, he was outfoxed.
If he was the greatest general ever, I wonder then why people say that Stonewall Jackson's death is what turned Gettysburg. That if he would have been there he would have been able to convince Lee of a different strategy?
I'll simplify it for you.
Lee had a bad strategy ... a better general might have been able to change his mind.
Not really what you said,General Jackson’s Earns The Nickname "Stonewall"
Jackson acquired his nickname two weeks later, July 21, on Henry Hill outside Manassas, in the Battle of First Bull Run (First Battle of Manassas). Infantry under South Carolinian brigadier general Bernard Bee had been engaged for some time and were falling back; Jackson’s brigade was in reserve. Bee told his men, "There stands Jackson like a stone wall," but whether he meant it as a compliment or an insult has been long debated. Bee was killed later in the battle. When Jackson threw his troops into the battle, they captured Union artillery atop the hill and fought the Federals until Confederate reinforcements caused a Union rout.
Eat **** and bark at the moon. This is from his military history.
I read somewhere that Jackson was supposed to attacked but failed to do so. Lee pointed out that "there stands Jackson like a stonewall". Not pushing the attack and that led people to call him stonewall Jackson.
Not really what you said,
No, I read Patton's biography. My guess is that historians have many interpretations of events. In the book on Patton I read, he did not want to lose the harbor at Antwerp. It was critical to our air power.
If you can, find it and read it. You get a different perspective from the man himself. He said in the book that an army the size of the germans in the BOTB, does not retreat, like so many like to make it sound like, it advances in a different direction. We fought that same army for the next 4 months. Patton made one mistake, his own comment on his son in law's attempted rescue, he was likely right about this too. I'll take his own words. There's a photo copy of the fair weather prayer.
He was pretty blunt when assessing other generals.I love reading and will try and find the book. I especially love history.
Yep Lee screwed the pooch at Gettysburg...he was desperate for a win that far North...he should have left the field after the 2nd day.
I really like this one by Cynthia Kelly , highly recommend.I love reading and will try and find the book. I especially love history.
Been there a few times. Best way to view the battlefield IMO is on bikes - easy to get around and not parking issues when you want to see something off the road. Keep telling my wife that I want to go back and take our 7 year old but she thinks he wouldn't appreciate it. I told her what boy wouldn't want to see cannons. Stroke of luck the other night when he brought up they were talking about the Civil War in class - I see a short summer trip in my future.I went to Gettysburg last Summer. I highly recommend it to anybody that hasn't been there. Pretty amazing.
Been there a few times. Best way to view the battlefield IMO is on bikes - easy to get around and not parking issues when you want to see something off the road. Keep telling my wife that I want to go back and take our 7 year old but she thinks he wouldn't appreciate it. I told her what boy wouldn't want to see cannons. Stroke of luck the other night when he brought up they were talking about the Civil War in class - I see a short summer trip in my future.
I really like this one by Cynthia Kelly , highly recommend.
The Manhattan Project: The Birth of the Atomic Bomb in the Words of Its Creators, Eyewitnesses, and Historians
Born out of a small research program that began in 1939, the Manhattan Project brought together the cream of the scientific community and the military to create and perfect a weapon more powerful than any the world had known. Racing against time as the war raged in Europe and Asia, and against our enemies, whom we feared were pursuing similar ends, the Project would eventually employ more than 125,000 people and cost a total of over $2 billion--and the entire operation was conducted under a shroud of secrecy, at remote sites around the country.This groundbreaking book--the first of its kind--collects the writings and thoughts of the original participants in the Manhattan Project, along with pieces by the most important historians and interpreters of the subject. It is a rich and comprehensive compilation of documents, essays, articles, and excerpts from histories, biographies, plays, novels, letters, oral histories, and more, and is the freshest, most multi-faceted exploration yet of the topic. Including material by and about J. Robert Oppenheimer, Leo Szilard, Albert Einstein, Richard Feynman, Leslie Groves, Klaus Fuchs, Henry Stimson, Vannevar Bush, Harry S. Truman, Niels Bohr, and many other key figures, it also collects the writings and testimony of those in the trenches at the Project, their families, and local eyewitnesses. Finally, the book includes thoughts and concerns about the bomb, set down in the aftermath of its deployment, by politicians, writers, artists, and others who saw that the world would never again be the same.Assembled with authority and care by the president of the Atomic HeritageFoundation--in cooperation with a team of advising historians that included the Pulitzer Prize-winning Richard Rhodes--"The Manhattan Project "is an invaluable addition to the historical record as well as a gripping narrative of scientific discovery, military strategy, and moral reflection.