I am all for free speech, but when it becomes blatant lies to incite rage and violence, isn't it illegal?
I'm betting LaPierre finds an excuse to puss out of the debate.
I'm betting LaPierre finds an excuse to puss out of the debate.
Hateful rhetoric that incites hostility
- Thread starter countryroads89_rivals
- Start date
Puss out of what debate? He's asking the President for a debate. If it doesn't happen it would be the President "pussing out". Your logic is bizarre.
I am saying the President will gladly accept and then LaPierre will make some excuse to puss out. Clear now?
LOL...amazing with your ability to see into the future why haven't you selected the winning power ball numbers?
And they still should have gone to that town hall after Obama accepted. Seems pretty repetitive to do this again. Maybe Obama would we be up for doing this after his term ends?
being able to ask one (maybe two) questions does not equal having a dialogue.
I will bet you a bottle of liquor the President will never agree to that. It's hard to put forth emotional based rhetoric against numbers and facts. I would put several of our board members in a debate with the President on gun control as they could carry the ground as well.
Country boy, you need to give a little cover when you offer your boy for debate. I am not sure Wayne would allow scripted areas to debate, and Obama has not proven to be a real giant without having responses available to be read from the prompter. I understand you would be able to see the words that Obama intends to say in the release the following day, but not too sure everyone is that lenient to read his intentions instead of actual words.
We are going to get that person who posted that hateful video that caused Benghazi! Lie of the decade. Both the commander n chief and Hildabeast
Given the fact in a real debate you only get 30 seconds to 1.5 mins, Obama couldn't compete without having Candy Crowley cover for him