I keep seeing this argument on this board. I don't think anybody is against hope. Hope is a good thing. What I am concerned about is that decisions about "social distancing standards", to use that term as broadly as possible, may be made based on that hope rather than on what we actually know. We know "stay at home" slows the spread and helps keep our hospitals from being overwhelmed. We hope some of these meds are going to work. We hope the heat and humidity of a Mississippi spring are going to knock this virus out. I don't think there is any poster who would not take an experimental med if faced with death. But, let's please make our society-wide decisions based on fact, rather than on hope.