When it’s 5 against 4, someone is going to be wide open.Texas hit 11 3’s… are we O-fer when teams hit >10?
I must’ve turned it off too early to see that effort you’re talking about. I saw Jones Jr busting his rear end off but that was it. What I saw was a lot of standing around letting TX rebound the ball uncontested one too many times. I wish I saw what you saw so I’d feel more optimistic.I’m sorry, I watched two teams play their asses off. The second half coaching decisions were great by Jans. The defense played with every bit of effort. We just didn’t make a play or two and the balls bounced their way. Several of their threes were with hands in their face and when they weren’t it was because our guys were busting through screens. I’ve watched some pretty bad MSU basketball over the last 10 years but I enjoyed the effort tonight.
We were never a "very good, legit top 10 team." Never even close. This is a top 25 team when it plays well. And outside the top 50 when it doesn't.We really were a very good, a legit top 10 team, not even 2 months ago. January 10th, 2025 to be exact. I have no clue what happened but this year reflects really poorly on Jans, from a pure coaching ability standpoint. He took a team that had real potential and the buttons he pushed this year were all the wrong ones. Unless he takes a step back and reevaluates some of his coaching tactics he’ll never win deep in tourney here or anywhere.
I get it, yes we had a great year for MSU Mens BBall for our history and anytime you go to tourney it is a successful year and from the outside yeah cool. But for those of us that follow closely, we know Jans took lemons and made lemonade, sure. But the lemonade tasted like sh-it.
The first and second half were night and day defensively. If they had played the first half like they did the second they would have won by 20.I must’ve turned it off too early to see that effort you’re talking about. I saw Jones Jr busting his rear end off but that was it. What I saw was a lot of standing around letting TX rebound the ball uncontested one too many times. I wish I saw what you saw so I’d feel more optimistic.
It will stay as a Quad 2. No way they’ll jump 11 spots unless they make some real noise in the SEC Tournament. I do agree that it’s not a horrible loss.It’s a high Quad 2 loss. Texas’s NET is 41, so this could be a low Quad 1 loss by the time Selection Sunday rolls around. I mean, it sucks to lose like that at home, but it’s not a ‘horrible’ loss.
You're right. I didn't look at their upcoming schedule. OU at home isn't going to move the needle for them.It will stay as a Quad 2. No way they’ll jump 11 spots unless they make some real noise in the SEC Tournament. I do agree that it’s not a horrible loss.
but it’s not a ‘horrible’ loss.
Doubtful.Here's the 17n question: can they win at least one game in the tournament?
Stick to baseball, Gramps.These moral losses are reeeally piling up.
We lost this game to a team at home that had lost 3 straight and a game we were favored by -6.5 in.
We lost @ OK in a game we were favored in by -4.5
We lost to FL at home in a game we were favored in by -2.5
We lost by 27 POINTS to Mizzou at home in a game we were favored in by -6.5
We lost to KY at home in a game we were favored by -4.5
When are they not 'horrible' losses?
The theme of the day lately is "Jans can coach but can't recruit". Do we think that recruits will look back and say "oh, that wasn't a horrible loss it was Quad blah blah blah and not Quad blah blah blah"? And how about home fans, next season when the bi-tchin and moaning about attendance starts (AGAIN) that's 4 right there that they will remember
Those are all losses we were favored in (Vegas Insider source)
I said after the game, I hope this isn't another Trey Forte situation. MVP of game 1.I remember the first game of the year against Nobody Tech when Harris came out bombing 3’s. Boy that was fools gold.
Man, mark this as another person that might not be cut out for MSU sports. We were more enjoyable this year than any year since sometime in the former half of Stansbury's tenure. Only team that I think was even close in that range was the year before Covid.This team is obviously what it is at this point. They have some talent but they are rarely enjoyable to watch kind of like Howland's teams I hate to say. We will make the tourney but I will be surprised if we win another game this season. I am kind or ready for it to be over.
Do I think we lost a single recruit because we lost to Kentucky or Texas (or really any of those teams you listed)?These moral losses are reeeally piling up.
We lost this game to a team at home that had lost 3 straight and a game we were favored by -6.5 in.
We lost @ OK in a game we were favored in by -4.5
We lost to FL at home in a game we were favored in by -2.5
We lost by 27 POINTS to Mizzou at home in a game we were favored in by -6.5
We lost to KY at home in a game we were favored by -4.5
When are they not 'horrible' losses?
The theme of the day lately is "Jans can coach but can't recruit". Do we think that recruits will look back and say "oh, that wasn't a horrible loss it was Quad blah blah blah and not Quad blah blah blah"? And how about home fans, next season when the bi-tchin and moaning about attendance starts (AGAIN) that's 4 right there that they will remember
Those are all losses we were favored in (Vegas Insider source)
Doesn't look like its in any better shape than basketball does it? But I'm not going to sit here and apologize for them and say "we were on the road this past weekend and its hard to win there", or "its cold outside and the bats will heat up when it gets warm", Bullshat.....all of those teams were on the road this past weekend and in our 2 opening weekend series also and all the teams we've been playing have all batted in the same temperatures we have. No excusesStick to baseball, Gramps.
I agree with what you said except this. The difference between the 6/7 seed line and the 8/9 is gigantic. With what I would boil down to the OU and UT losses lately, we've basically played our way into a guaranteed second round exit AT BEST.The difference between a 7 seed and a 9 seed? Sure, but who cares?
Prepare thy anus for the three point shooting white boys at Creighton and a first round bow out.And that is IF we get a good (non-3pt-shooting) matchup as the first round 9 seed.
I am aware and will prepare accordingly.Prepare thy anus for the three point shooting white boys at Creighton and a first round bow out.
It really looks like we are worn down and our legs are gone. SEC has been a grind on every team but we seem affected more than most. Will likely lose 4 of 5 going into SEC tourney and I don't see us getting more than 1 win max in the NCAA tourney given we will likely see a 1 seed in the second round. We are a shell of the team we were coming into the SEC season where we started out destroying SC and beating Vandy handily in Nashville.We really were a very good, a legit top 10 team, not even 2 months ago. January 10th, 2025 to be exact. I have no clue what happened but this year reflects really poorly on Jans, from a pure coaching ability standpoint. He took a team that had real potential and the buttons he pushed this year were all the wrong ones. Unless he takes a step back and reevaluates some of his coaching tactics he’ll never win deep in tourney here or anywhere.
I get it, yes we had a great year for MSU Mens BBall for our history and anytime you go to tourney it is a successful year and from the outside yeah cool. But for those of us that follow closely, we know Jans took lemons and made lemonade, sure. But the lemonade tasted like sh-it.
It was a HORRIBLE loss. Team coming in to our arena on a three game skid where they have looked like tore up dogcrap and stick it to us. Now, we're looking at losing 5 of our last 6-7 games. It drops our seeding in both the SECT and NCAAT. The timing of the loss, a home game(Senior Night to boot) plus all these factors make it a HORRIBLE loss. You can say it isn't but it is. Just bad.It’s a high Quad 2 loss. Texas’s NET is 41, so this could be a low Quad 1 loss by the time Selection Sunday rolls around. I mean, it sucks to lose like that at home, but it’s not a ‘horrible’ loss.
8/9 would be a disappointment after the start.I agree with what you said except this. The difference between the 6/7 seed line and the 8/9 is gigantic. With what I would boil down to the OU and UT losses lately, we've basically played our way into a guaranteed second round exit AT BEST.
I still think we are capable of beating some of the highest ranked teams in the country, depending on their style of offense. But Auburn, Duke, Houston, whoever the other 1 seed is... they all shoot the 3. That's all that matters. We aren't stepping up to beat any of the 1 seeds, which is what the 8/9 gets second round. And that is IF we get a good (non-3pt-shooting) matchup as the first round 9 seed.
If not for these two losses, we're at least a 6 and I would give us a puncher's chance for the second weekend in the tournament. Not now, unless we hit the lottery twice in the bracket.
Meh. It's not that big of a difference. Do you really think it matters much whether we play Duke / Houston or Iowa St. / Michigan St. in the 2nd round? Assuming we get past an 8, 9, 10 seed in the 1st round, which is far from a given.The difference between the 6/7 seed line and the 8/9 is gigantic. With what I would boil down to the OU and UT losses lately, we've basically played our way into a guaranteed second round exit AT BEST.
Therein lies the rub for me. You can't be that bi-polar. Anybody that has played any level of sports has probably played for a team like that and it is 17n miserable for players and fans.We were never a "very good, legit top 10 team." Never even close. This is a top 25 team when it plays well. And outside the top 50 when it doesn't.
This is false, at least for me.Man, mark this as another person that might not be cut out for MSU sports. We were more enjoyable this year than any year since sometime in the former half of Stansbury's tenure. Only team that I think was even close in that range was the year before Covid.
Is it really gigantic though? We haven't made it out of the first weekend since Bill Clinton's first term. We're going to struggle to get to the sweet 16 no matter if the team is a 1, 2, or 3 seed.I agree with what you said except this. The difference between the 6/7 seed line and the 8/9 is gigantic. With what I would boil down to the OU and UT losses lately, we've basically played our way into a guaranteed second round exit AT BEST.
I still think we are capable of beating some of the highest ranked teams in the country, depending on their style of offense. But Auburn, Duke, Houston, whoever the other 1 seed is... they all shoot the 3. That's all that matters. We aren't stepping up to beat any of the 1 seeds, which is what the 8/9 gets second round. And that is IF we get a good (non-3pt-shooting) matchup as the first round 9 seed.
If not for these two losses, we're at least a 6 and I would give us a puncher's chance for the second weekend in the tournament. Not now, unless we hit the lottery twice in the bracket.
Pump the brakes now. I was told our sports are doing well just the competition is really good. **ms state athletics is a dumpster fire right now
This is exactly how i feel.Truth be told, we just don’t have any high level talent. Hubbard is small, can’t defend, and a streaky shooter. He was 3-12 tonight and 1-6 from three. Kugal has talent but is a complete head case. Cam can’t shoot at all. Murphy is pretty good but gets muscled down low. Melendez is a role player, and Harris has gone MIA. Jans is a hell of a coach to coax 20 wins out of this bunch, but we appear to be running out of gas. We have to get better talent if we want to be anything more than a bubble or slightly better team.
At this point that's all I really care about. Improve on last year. Pray we keep our basketball Dan Mullen, because you know he's looking around. Then hopefully keep it going next year and beyond.Here's the 17n question: can they win at least one game in the tournament?
Uh... yes, it matters a lot. Have you seen them play?Meh. It's not that big of a difference. Do you really think it matters much whether we play Duke / Houston or Iowa St. / Michigan St. in the 2nd round? Assuming we get past an 8, 9, 10 seed in the 1st round, which is far from a given.