Horrible loss….

Lettuce

All-Conference
Jun 24, 2024
917
1,060
93
Not sure what that means…”grow it” our guys had ample opportunity to throw the ball inside the basket. Coach can’t shoot nor can he defend a 3 on weakside, that’s effort. Let’s not get into free throw shooting
 

Lettuce

All-Conference
Jun 24, 2024
917
1,060
93
We ran same sets vs Memphis and Pitt. Both dominating wins. Same coach, same style. At some point a fella gotta make a shot and block out.

that’s on the player
 
  • Like
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

Lettuce

All-Conference
Jun 24, 2024
917
1,060
93
I can promise you we practice both relentlessly. It’s pudding stats. And it’s hard to watch when you like sweets
 

WilCoDawg

All-Conference
Sep 6, 2012
5,264
3,654
113
I’m sorry, I watched two teams play their asses off. The second half coaching decisions were great by Jans. The defense played with every bit of effort. We just didn’t make a play or two and the balls bounced their way. Several of their threes were with hands in their face and when they weren’t it was because our guys were busting through screens. I’ve watched some pretty bad MSU basketball over the last 10 years but I enjoyed the effort tonight.
I must’ve turned it off too early to see that effort you’re talking about. I saw Jones Jr busting his rear end off but that was it. What I saw was a lot of standing around letting TX rebound the ball uncontested one too many times. I wish I saw what you saw so I’d feel more optimistic.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,836
26,238
113
We really were a very good, a legit top 10 team, not even 2 months ago. January 10th, 2025 to be exact. I have no clue what happened but this year reflects really poorly on Jans, from a pure coaching ability standpoint. He took a team that had real potential and the buttons he pushed this year were all the wrong ones. Unless he takes a step back and reevaluates some of his coaching tactics he’ll never win deep in tourney here or anywhere.

I get it, yes we had a great year for MSU Mens BBall for our history and anytime you go to tourney it is a successful year and from the outside yeah cool. But for those of us that follow closely, we know Jans took lemons and made lemonade, sure. But the lemonade tasted like sh-it.
We were never a "very good, legit top 10 team." Never even close. This is a top 25 team when it plays well. And outside the top 50 when it doesn't.
 
Nov 16, 2005
27,583
20,593
113
I must’ve turned it off too early to see that effort you’re talking about. I saw Jones Jr busting his rear end off but that was it. What I saw was a lot of standing around letting TX rebound the ball uncontested one too many times. I wish I saw what you saw so I’d feel more optimistic.
The first and second half were night and day defensively. If they had played the first half like they did the second they would have won by 20.
 

The Cooterpoot

Heisman
Sep 29, 2022
6,860
11,970
113
Jans biggest portal takes:
AWOL PG
Head case Kugel
Bipolar Menendez

Why did he think those guys would help us? He's basically failing in the portal era to an extend. Other than Hubb, what HS recruit has done anything? His recruiting has been poor!
But, he's got a good class coming in this time it appears, with three straight NCAA teams. I dont think coaching is really a problem much, it's the recruiting that's killed us.
 

Dawgg

Heisman
Sep 9, 2012
10,535
10,793
113
It’s a high Quad 2 loss. Texas’s NET is 41, so this could be a low Quad 1 loss by the time Selection Sunday rolls around. I mean, it sucks to lose like that at home, but it’s not a ‘horrible’ loss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

Shmuley

Heisman
Mar 6, 2008
23,833
10,639
113
Here's the 17n question: can they win at least one game in the tournament?
 
Nov 16, 2005
27,583
20,593
113
It’s a high Quad 2 loss. Texas’s NET is 41, so this could be a low Quad 1 loss by the time Selection Sunday rolls around. I mean, it sucks to lose like that at home, but it’s not a ‘horrible’ loss.
It will stay as a Quad 2. No way they’ll jump 11 spots unless they make some real noise in the SEC Tournament. I do agree that it’s not a horrible loss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgg

Dawgg

Heisman
Sep 9, 2012
10,535
10,793
113
It will stay as a Quad 2. No way they’ll jump 11 spots unless they make some real noise in the SEC Tournament. I do agree that it’s not a horrible loss.
You're right. I didn't look at their upcoming schedule. OU at home isn't going to move the needle for them.
 

The Peeper

Heisman
Feb 26, 2008
15,452
10,594
113
but it’s not a ‘horrible’ loss.

These moral losses are reeeally piling up.

We lost this game to a team at home that had lost 3 straight and a game we were favored by -6.5 in.
We lost @ OK in a game we were favored in by -4.5
We lost to FL at home in a game we were favored in by -2.5
We lost by 27 POINTS to Mizzou at home in a game we were favored in by -6.5
We lost to KY at home in a game we were favored by -4.5
When are they not 'horrible' losses?

The theme of the day lately is "Jans can coach but can't recruit". Do we think that recruits will look back and say "oh, that wasn't a horrible loss it was Quad blah blah blah and not Quad blah blah blah"? And how about home fans, next season when the bi-tchin and moaning about attendance starts (AGAIN) that's 4 right there that they will remember

Those are all losses we were favored in (Vegas Insider source)
 

tcdog70

Junior
Sep 24, 2012
1,375
247
63
fact-whoever Hub is guarding -it's like shooting with no-one guarding you. 5'8" can't guard 6'3". When Hub is Casper the ghost in the first half we will have a hard time winning. he has to score 30 to make up for His defense. We had to put Jones or Cam on
20 just to slow him down. He is a hell of a player. Kugel was in some kind of funk the first half--played good in second half till crunch time and He had to make 2 free throws and he choked big time. we have lost if Fayetteville with way better teams than this one. Look for us to **** the bed. Then may be win a game in tourney.. Guess we should be glad to make big dance.. we better recruit some 3 point shooters.
 
Nov 16, 2005
27,583
20,593
113
These moral losses are reeeally piling up.

We lost this game to a team at home that had lost 3 straight and a game we were favored by -6.5 in.
We lost @ OK in a game we were favored in by -4.5
We lost to FL at home in a game we were favored in by -2.5
We lost by 27 POINTS to Mizzou at home in a game we were favored in by -6.5
We lost to KY at home in a game we were favored by -4.5
When are they not 'horrible' losses?

The theme of the day lately is "Jans can coach but can't recruit". Do we think that recruits will look back and say "oh, that wasn't a horrible loss it was Quad blah blah blah and not Quad blah blah blah"? And how about home fans, next season when the bi-tchin and moaning about attendance starts (AGAIN) that's 4 right there that they will remember

Those are all losses we were favored in (Vegas Insider source)
Stick to baseball, Gramps.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: RopeDawg and Dawgg

Darryl Steight

All-American
Sep 30, 2022
3,784
6,354
113
I remember the first game of the year against Nobody Tech when Harris came out bombing 3’s. Boy that was fools gold.
I said after the game, I hope this isn't another Trey Forte situation. MVP of game 1.

I will say, at least Harris has contributed all year. He's a streaky shooter, but plays hard and always looks to have a good demeanor on the court and the bench. I realize this is akin to me setting you up with a girl that's "got a great personality".
 

thekimmer

All-Conference
Aug 30, 2012
8,103
2,115
113
This team is obviously what it is at this point. They have some talent but they are rarely enjoyable to watch kind of like Howland's teams I hate to say. We will make the tourney but I will be surprised if we win another game this season. I am kind or ready for it to be over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: leeinator

johnson86-1

All-Conference
Aug 22, 2012
14,334
4,838
113
This team is obviously what it is at this point. They have some talent but they are rarely enjoyable to watch kind of like Howland's teams I hate to say. We will make the tourney but I will be surprised if we win another game this season. I am kind or ready for it to be over.
Man, mark this as another person that might not be cut out for MSU sports. We were more enjoyable this year than any year since sometime in the former half of Stansbury's tenure. Only team that I think was even close in that range was the year before Covid.

We are a pretty good and dangerous team, but not a good team. It's been a little disappointing because there was a time where I thought we were going to be a top 15 team, but still all in all this has been a fun team to watch play, even if frustrating at times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ll Martain ll

Dawgg

Heisman
Sep 9, 2012
10,535
10,793
113
These moral losses are reeeally piling up.

We lost this game to a team at home that had lost 3 straight and a game we were favored by -6.5 in.
We lost @ OK in a game we were favored in by -4.5
We lost to FL at home in a game we were favored in by -2.5
We lost by 27 POINTS to Mizzou at home in a game we were favored in by -6.5
We lost to KY at home in a game we were favored by -4.5
When are they not 'horrible' losses?

The theme of the day lately is "Jans can coach but can't recruit". Do we think that recruits will look back and say "oh, that wasn't a horrible loss it was Quad blah blah blah and not Quad blah blah blah"? And how about home fans, next season when the bi-tchin and moaning about attendance starts (AGAIN) that's 4 right there that they will remember

Those are all losses we were favored in (Vegas Insider source)
Do I think we lost a single recruit because we lost to Kentucky or Texas (or really any of those teams you listed)?
No, I do not, especially not in a historically good season for the conference.

Do I think we could gain recruits by being a perennial tournament team? Yes, I do. That's why Quad 1/2/3/4 wins and losses matter.

Sure, these losses suck and it's frustrating because you know in your heart that we should beat these teams, but in the grand scheme of things, those losses aren't going to keep us out of the NCAA Tournament, which is what really matters. The difference between a 7 seed and a 9 seed? Sure, but who cares?

Now, your point on attendance is well taken. These losses could affect attendance, especially those demoralizing home losses, but that's the fickle nature of our basketball fanbase. It's been that way for decades now. That being said, I don't know if that's something specific to our fanbase and I don't know what kind of success metrics have to be met to break that cycle (or if those milestones exist at all).
 

The Peeper

Heisman
Feb 26, 2008
15,452
10,594
113
Stick to baseball, Gramps.
Doesn't look like its in any better shape than basketball does it? But I'm not going to sit here and apologize for them and say "we were on the road this past weekend and its hard to win there", or "its cold outside and the bats will heat up when it gets warm", Bullshat.....all of those teams were on the road this past weekend and in our 2 opening weekend series also and all the teams we've been playing have all batted in the same temperatures we have. No excuses

How do you sweep under the rug 5 basketball losses you were favored in, 4 of them at home? Just getting to the tournament (NCAA) is a weak nail to hang a hat on. Those 5 losses in games we were favored in can be a big difference in going 1 and done or snagging a win or two.

This whole basketball season has been one big apology since the KY loss at home. Now the "wait till the end of the conference season because we were loaded up on front end" gang suddenly sees we are 1-3 in the last 2 weeks with a road game at Bud Walton Saturday

Been a long time since Lunardi said we were a 2 seed and fans were saying we would be Top 5 if we beat KY........
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgs87 and patdog

Darryl Steight

All-American
Sep 30, 2022
3,784
6,354
113
The difference between a 7 seed and a 9 seed? Sure, but who cares?
I agree with what you said except this. The difference between the 6/7 seed line and the 8/9 is gigantic. With what I would boil down to the OU and UT losses lately, we've basically played our way into a guaranteed second round exit AT BEST.

I still think we are capable of beating some of the highest ranked teams in the country, depending on their style of offense. But Auburn, Duke, Houston, whoever the other 1 seed is... they all shoot the 3. That's all that matters. We aren't stepping up to beat any of the 1 seeds, which is what the 8/9 gets second round. And that is IF we get a good (non-3pt-shooting) matchup as the first round 9 seed.

If not for these two losses, we're at least a 6 and I would give us a puncher's chance for the second weekend in the tournament. Not now, unless we hit the lottery twice in the bracket.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgs87

Seinfeld

All-American
Nov 30, 2006
11,154
6,977
113
Let me preface this by saying again that I like Jans, but here’s the part that I put on him

If you want to coach a team to focus on hard nosed defense, fine.

If you want to switch gears and build a roster of shooters, fine.

What you can’t do, though, is completely sacrifice a team’s defensive tenacity for shooting, and then find out that you somehow brought in a bunch of guys that can’t shoot. We’ve now got a team that isn’t particularly great at anything, and we’ve got 3-4 guys in a 8 man rotation that give us absolutely nothing way too often.
 

POTUS

Heisman
Sep 29, 2022
3,905
10,327
113
I mean I like Jans. There's no denying what he's done. But how many guys have to have career days from three before we admit we're the problem? Could we at least try getting beaten by post-ups?

I've watched almost every game we've played and there are a few things that even a novice like me can see:
1. Cam should never shoot threes. Immediate benching if he tries one that isn't a shot clock save attempt
2. No more traps. Let them run a post game against us. How many teams are disciplined enough to keep feeding the post?
3. Do more offense for defense (and vice versa) subs in late game scenarios. We can't have Hubbard guarding the SEC's leading scorer in a late game situation and we sure as heck can't have Cam shooting vital free throws.
 

maroonmania

Senior
Feb 23, 2008
11,152
830
113
We really were a very good, a legit top 10 team, not even 2 months ago. January 10th, 2025 to be exact. I have no clue what happened but this year reflects really poorly on Jans, from a pure coaching ability standpoint. He took a team that had real potential and the buttons he pushed this year were all the wrong ones. Unless he takes a step back and reevaluates some of his coaching tactics he’ll never win deep in tourney here or anywhere.

I get it, yes we had a great year for MSU Mens BBall for our history and anytime you go to tourney it is a successful year and from the outside yeah cool. But for those of us that follow closely, we know Jans took lemons and made lemonade, sure. But the lemonade tasted like sh-it.
It really looks like we are worn down and our legs are gone. SEC has been a grind on every team but we seem affected more than most. Will likely lose 4 of 5 going into SEC tourney and I don't see us getting more than 1 win max in the NCAA tourney given we will likely see a 1 seed in the second round. We are a shell of the team we were coming into the SEC season where we started out destroying SC and beating Vandy handily in Nashville.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RopeDawg

msudawg1200

Senior
Sep 19, 2012
1,019
963
113
It’s a high Quad 2 loss. Texas’s NET is 41, so this could be a low Quad 1 loss by the time Selection Sunday rolls around. I mean, it sucks to lose like that at home, but it’s not a ‘horrible’ loss.
It was a HORRIBLE loss. Team coming in to our arena on a three game skid where they have looked like tore up dogcrap and stick it to us. Now, we're looking at losing 5 of our last 6-7 games. It drops our seeding in both the SECT and NCAAT. The timing of the loss, a home game(Senior Night to boot) plus all these factors make it a HORRIBLE loss. You can say it isn't but it is. Just bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RopeDawg
Nov 16, 2005
27,583
20,593
113
I agree with what you said except this. The difference between the 6/7 seed line and the 8/9 is gigantic. With what I would boil down to the OU and UT losses lately, we've basically played our way into a guaranteed second round exit AT BEST.

I still think we are capable of beating some of the highest ranked teams in the country, depending on their style of offense. But Auburn, Duke, Houston, whoever the other 1 seed is... they all shoot the 3. That's all that matters. We aren't stepping up to beat any of the 1 seeds, which is what the 8/9 gets second round. And that is IF we get a good (non-3pt-shooting) matchup as the first round 9 seed.

If not for these two losses, we're at least a 6 and I would give us a puncher's chance for the second weekend in the tournament. Not now, unless we hit the lottery twice in the bracket.
8/9 would be a disappointment after the start.

I still would rather be a 7 instead of a 6 seed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darryl Steight
Sep 15, 2009
443
223
43
It was good to see a game live, because I got to see them warm up. Let me rephrase, I got to see Texas warm up. During warm ups (this is the time before the game where Texas warms up on one half of the court, and MSU stands around on the other end apparently just to keep Texas from having access to the whole court), I told my son we were losing this game - there was no question about it.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,836
26,238
113
The difference between the 6/7 seed line and the 8/9 is gigantic. With what I would boil down to the OU and UT losses lately, we've basically played our way into a guaranteed second round exit AT BEST.
Meh. It's not that big of a difference. Do you really think it matters much whether we play Duke / Houston or Iowa St. / Michigan St. in the 2nd round? Assuming we get past an 8, 9, 10 seed in the 1st round, which is far from a given.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgg

HRMSU

All-Conference
Apr 26, 2022
1,416
1,275
113
We were never a "very good, legit top 10 team." Never even close. This is a top 25 team when it plays well. And outside the top 50 when it doesn't.
Therein lies the rub for me. You can't be that bi-polar. Anybody that has played any level of sports has probably played for a team like that and it is 17n miserable for players and fans.

We are consistently inconsistent. Nothing is more frustrating than wasted potential.
 

Dawgs87

Redshirt
Nov 27, 2017
41
28
18
Man, mark this as another person that might not be cut out for MSU sports. We were more enjoyable this year than any year since sometime in the former half of Stansbury's tenure. Only team that I think was even close in that range was the year before Covid.
This is false, at least for me.

22-23 and 23-24 seasons were much more enjoyable to watch as a fan, having watched every game all 3 seasons myself. I had hope back then. At least in the 23 and 24 seasons, we knew who we were and we could reliably count on being in any game solely because of how our defense played.

This year, if the other team makes 3 or 4 threes early on, you know it's going to be a rough night. Then, if the other team doesn't start trying to build a house brick by brick, we all know that we can't score enough to catch up OR stop the other team. Our success is totally dependent on our opponents ability to nail the open 3's that we decide to give them.

I'm expecting that in the NCAAT we get matched up with (insert team here) that hits 10+ 3s at 48%, and we go down without even a whimper, because that IS who we are. That is what we have all been set up to expect, and you would be crazy not to based on results this season.

Having every almost every team we play have someone with a career night from 3 is definitely NOT enjoyable. It's predictable at this point, and dare I say, disappointing at the very least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RopeDawg

Dawgg

Heisman
Sep 9, 2012
10,535
10,793
113
I agree with what you said except this. The difference between the 6/7 seed line and the 8/9 is gigantic. With what I would boil down to the OU and UT losses lately, we've basically played our way into a guaranteed second round exit AT BEST.

I still think we are capable of beating some of the highest ranked teams in the country, depending on their style of offense. But Auburn, Duke, Houston, whoever the other 1 seed is... they all shoot the 3. That's all that matters. We aren't stepping up to beat any of the 1 seeds, which is what the 8/9 gets second round. And that is IF we get a good (non-3pt-shooting) matchup as the first round 9 seed.

If not for these two losses, we're at least a 6 and I would give us a puncher's chance for the second weekend in the tournament. Not now, unless we hit the lottery twice in the bracket.
Is it really gigantic though? We haven't made it out of the first weekend since Bill Clinton's first term. We're going to struggle to get to the sweet 16 no matter if the team is a 1, 2, or 3 seed.
 

Trojanbulldog19

All-American
Aug 25, 2014
9,989
5,767
113
ms state athletics is a dumpster fire right now
Pump the brakes now. I was told our sports are doing well just the competition is really good. **

problem with that is we play in the sec if our competition is getting better so should we. Baseball is crap now compared to the top of the conference where we used to be. Basketball nowhere near the top of conference either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WilCoDawg

99jc

Senior
Jul 31, 2008
2,501
493
83
Truth be told, we just don’t have any high level talent. Hubbard is small, can’t defend, and a streaky shooter. He was 3-12 tonight and 1-6 from three. Kugal has talent but is a complete head case. Cam can’t shoot at all. Murphy is pretty good but gets muscled down low. Melendez is a role player, and Harris has gone MIA. Jans is a hell of a coach to coax 20 wins out of this bunch, but we appear to be running out of gas. We have to get better talent if we want to be anything more than a bubble or slightly better team.
This is exactly how i feel.
 

OG Goat Holder

Heisman
Sep 30, 2022
12,269
11,339
113
Here's the 17n question: can they win at least one game in the tournament?
At this point that's all I really care about. Improve on last year. Pray we keep our basketball Dan Mullen, because you know he's looking around. Then hopefully keep it going next year and beyond.

The reason why this is all so frustrating is the same reason that I'm so into it at the moment.....because Jans made us care more and think we could do better. Similar to what Mullen did, when we were all but checked out due to the Croom Error.

And plus I know our NIL can compete in basketball, unlike football. There's a little hope there.
 

Darryl Steight

All-American
Sep 30, 2022
3,784
6,354
113
Meh. It's not that big of a difference. Do you really think it matters much whether we play Duke / Houston or Iowa St. / Michigan St. in the 2nd round? Assuming we get past an 8, 9, 10 seed in the 1st round, which is far from a given.
Uh... yes, it matters a lot. Have you seen them play?

Michigan State: 29.7% and 165 3-pointers made. That's worse than us in both categories, if you can believe that.
Duke: 38.5% and 313 3-pointers made.

I would no doubt rather play Michigan State - I know what happened last year, and yes I'd still want to play them.