Hurley would have been fired at UK before ever winning a champ

Anony Moose

Senior
Dec 2, 2025
661
817
93
U Conn did. Took Hurley 5 years there. No excuses
Lulz. UCONN only has 19 sw16s, 17 before Hurley, buttercup.

He took over a team on probation who went 14-18 the year before he took over.

He improved them each season. He also had a track record of doing so at 2 previous schools

So, try again?
 

KyCPA2000

All-Conference
Nov 24, 2007
948
1,007
93
That 22 million dollar figure isn’t a lie.


Yes and no. Some that 22M was spread over 2 years first some players. Still a lot for what we got.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Woodrow24

JakeKx

Senior
Oct 5, 2023
432
669
92
I feel like at Kentucky you’ve got 5-7 years to win a title. If it’s obvious that isn’t going to happen then you need to move on even sooner if need be. Like the situation we have now. The standard should never be lowered. WE ARE college basketball and it’s an absolute disgrace to see what Barnhart has done to this program and all of athletics over the past decade.
 

theKybluedude

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
444
1,046
93
Lulz. UCONN only has 19 sw16s, 17 before Hurley, buttercup.

He took over a team on probation who went 14-18 the year before he took over.

He improved them each season. He also had a track record of doing so at 2 previous schools

So, try again?
Please don’t try tell us Hurley turned around a fledging U Conn program. That’s laughable. They had 4 NCAA titles… 4… and numerous conference titles prior to his arrival.

Additionally he was only a 60% winner at his 2 prior stops. No titles.

C’mon man. Took him 5 years at U Conn to get out of the 1st round in the Tourney. Wasn’t even in it his first 2 years at U Conn.

Not saying he didn’t develop into a fine coach but he got time to find himself and he wasn’t setting the college game on fire before he got there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKCowboys

Anony Moose

Senior
Dec 2, 2025
661
817
93
Please don’t try tell us Hurley turned around a fledging U Conn program. That’s laughable. They had 4 NCAA titles… 4… and numerous conference titles prior to his arrival.

Additionally he was only a 60% winner at his 2 prior stops. No titles.

C’mon man. Took him 5 years at U Conn to get out of the 1st round in the Tourney. Wasn’t even in it his first 2 years at U Conn.

Not saying he didn’t develop into a fine coach but he got time to find himself and he wasn’t setting the college game on fire before he got there.
Not saying it doesn’t mean it didn't happen, though. They were in fact 14-18, under investigation and put on probation when he took over. He did in fact turn them around, improved each season and went on to win 2 titles. He did that during a time when no instant eligibility transfer portal or NIL existed.

When you take over dumpster programs and build then up, you're going to have a lower win percentage. He went 13-17 and then 25-6 in 2 years at Wagner. That's impressive.

At RI, he took over a team that went 7-24. His teams won a conference tournament and a regular season champion in his last 2 years and he took them to their first 2 ncaa appearances in almost 20 years. Again, no portal, no NIL. Just good coaching. Had a 68% win his last 4 years and 74% his last 2.

C'mon man, he took over a trashed Uconn program that was on probation. He didn't have the luxury of a portal or NIL to rebuild instantly. Yet they improved each year.

I mean... if we just ignore his resume and the reality, we can pretend that's true, but he was honestly considered a strong young coach at the time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mossip

UKCowboys

All-Conference
Oct 14, 2019
2,208
3,738
113
Not saying it doesn’t mean it didn't happen though. They were in fact 14-18 and under investigation and out on probation when he took over. He did in fsct turn them around, improved each season and went on to win 2 titles. He did that initially with no instant eligibility transfer portal or NIL.

When you take over dumpster programs and build then up, you're going to have a lower win percentage. He went 13-17 and then 25-6 in 2 years at Wagner.

At RI, he took over a team that went 7-24. Was a conference tournament and a regular season champion in his last 2 years and took them to their first 2 ncaa appearances in almost 20 years. Again, no portal, no NIL. Just good coaching. Had a 68% win his last 4 years and 74% his last 2.

C'mon man, he took over a trashed Uconn program was on probation. He didn't have the luxury of a portal or NIL to rebuild instantly. Yet they improved each year.

I mean if we just ignore his resume and reality we can pretend that's true, but he was honestly considered a strong young coach at the time.
Ridiculous
 

Scratchycat2

All-Conference
Apr 10, 2024
5,816
2,512
113
Year 1: 16-17 (missed tourney)
Year 2: 19-12 (may have missed tourney - COVID)
Year 3: 15-8 (7 seed, lost in first round)
Year 4: 23-10 (5 seed, lost in first round)
Year 5: 31-8 (champ)
Year 6: 37-3 (champ)

To be honest, I'm personally torn on Pope.
  • Gets down early in games, seems to be a game preparation issue. It's not just a problem this year or because of injuries.
  • Being down 12 or more points in 13 of 19 games against power 4 seems nearly impossible.
  • Subbing patterns are terrible.
  • Has had some odd interviews, especially after losses
  • Incredibly inconsistent game to game (throughout his career, not just here)
  • Hasn't proved he can finish better than 5th in his conference
  • Has missed out on top recruits and hasn't signed anyone this year (it's still unclear to me if this is a Pope problem or JMI problem or both)
  • ...fill in the blank
However, I do think if you give a highly intelligent, highly passionate coach time, especially one that will give everything for the program, he can learn from his mistakes and improve. I get the frustration because I'm incredibly frustrated, and given the choice today, I may opt for a new coach, I'm not sure. I'm far from a sunshine pumper when it comes to Pope.

But at the same time, I do think he has a lot of positives that can translate into championships given time to learn/progress.
  • Has proven he can build an elite offense
  • He's more passionate about Kentucky than any other coach out there
  • Will work his *** off to get better. Will work his *** off to improve his team.
  • The type of man and personality you want running your program
  • He truly has dealt with an unprecedented amount of injuries, yet still made the s16 last year and has shown he can adapt this year and have some success. We wouldn't be complaining about J. Johnson or Noah playing too much if we had Lowe and/or Kam. We could handle more interior physicality with JQ.
The main point is this:
Look at Hurley's first four years. Fans would've have been far more upset with him than we are with Pope - and now he's now the premier coach. Coach K completely missed the tournament his first 3 years, but they gave him time to come into his own (yes, I know today is different with the transfer portal and one-and-dones. But a 38-47 start, we would have gone nuclear). There's a big list of coaches who had rough starts before winning chips, but their schools gave them the chance to learn and improve. I think Pope can get better, I just hope he does it sooner rather than later.

I'm personally willing to be patient through year 3 if that's what the administration wants to do, but if it's the same story, I'll be begging for a change.

I'd also be good with a change after this year (I just don't think that'll happen)
Easy answer can’t recruit can’t recruit can’t recruit. Hurley is not pope . Pope is like a youth pastor and Hurley is a A-hole but he demands more from his players he just coaches differently.
 

Scratchycat2

All-Conference
Apr 10, 2024
5,816
2,512
113
Or at least some of the fan base would be calling for him to have been fired. Hurley is a king where he is, they most likely will never let him go unless he does something really stupid, he can do pretty much what he wants and doesn't have to worry about part of his fan base calling for his head, like UK.
We’ll see we waited 6 years of bs with cal to be gone if we go another 5 similar to those 5 years my god we would never be good again it would be 20 years without even a final four
 

Scratchycat2

All-Conference
Apr 10, 2024
5,816
2,512
113
People trying to compare Hurley to pope Hurley has it in him to have a been a good coach pope has never proven or done anything in his life to prove that he can coach. He should’ve been a doctor bad career change on his part
 

Scratchycat2

All-Conference
Apr 10, 2024
5,816
2,512
113
Or at least some of the fan base would be calling for him to have been fired. Hurley is a king where he is, they most likely will never let him go unless he does something really stupid, he can do pretty much what he wants and doesn't have to worry about part of his fan base calling for his head, like UK.
Hurley doing something really stupid I could see it he’s crazy it’s just a matter of time . Who knows he could head butt a ref.he did it to his players I’ve seen it in a game before and he was like laughing afterwards. He’d be the guy to get in a fist fight with another coach or do something crazy to his players that get him fired
 

Reggie Noble

Freshman
Jul 5, 2025
46
60
18
Please don’t try tell us Hurley turned around a fledging U Conn program. That’s laughable. They had 4 NCAA titles… 4… and numerous conference titles prior to his arrival.

Additionally he was only a 60% winner at his 2 prior stops. No titles.

C’mon man. Took him 5 years at U Conn to get out of the 1st round in the Tourney. Wasn’t even in it his first 2 years at U Conn.

Not saying he didn’t develop into a fine coach but he got time to find himself and he wasn’t setting the college game on fire before he got there.
UCONN was on probation a year after when Hurley took over. "UConn men’s basketball has been placed on NCAA probation for two years from July 2019 to July 2021, stemming from violations regarding impermissible activities under former coach Kevin Ollie." Also, in 2020 there was no tourney.
 

preacherfan

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2003
28,517
3,753
113
Hurley's first 4 years would have yielded different results at KY.

Maybe not as much as you think. Hurley admitted that he had to CHANGE his coaching philosophy to turn things around at UConn. I don't know why everyone ignores this fact.

 

Dward13

All-Conference
Feb 5, 2008
9,928
1,045
72
Guys Dan Hurley had accomplished enough to that point to warrant patience. Mark Pope has not. And hes had plenty of time to do it. 11 years.

Dan Hurley also learned under arguably the greatest high school basketball coach in History. Seriously. His dad is a legend. After 2 years as a player under Rick Pitino 30 years ago, Mark Pope learned under…Mark Fox.

Theres really no comparison. We all wanted to believe but it’s become painfully obvious to anyone with a functioning brain that hiring Pope was a massive reach.
 

Scratchycat2

All-Conference
Apr 10, 2024
5,816
2,512
113
typical response from an irrational fan who is miserable.... of course they are different people ... DUH... that was in no way the point lol
There’s more to it they act way different meaning Hurley gets a lot more out of his players also Hurley didn’t have 22 million dollars.Hurley is not the coach of Kentucky this isn’t a rebuild type of program never has been. There’s just no comparison with Hurley and pope two totally different situations and also pope can’t recruit not a single player. You don’t need 5 years to see a guy that can’t recruit a coach that changes his lineups every two seconds he has horrible roster building how many years does pope get it to get right ? He has coached 62 games here he’s lost 6 games at rupp worst in his first two years here which is the most a Kentucky coach has had in his first two years . He is down by double digits every single game he should have a losing record. Everyone knows Pope can not be here any real fan would see he’s just not gonna cut it .
 

DelkBowl

Heisman
Oct 4, 2015
10,610
11,596
101
Maybe not as much as you think. Hurley admitted that he had to CHANGE his coaching philosophy to turn things around at UConn. I don't know why everyone ignores this fact.

Basing that on easier recruiting and name recognition. Nothing about his coaching.
 

KYWC36

All-Conference
Jul 11, 2013
1,208
1,765
113
There’s more to it they act way different meaning Hurley gets a lot more out of his players also Hurley didn’t have 22 million dollars.Hurley is not the coach of Kentucky this isn’t a rebuild type of program never has been. There’s just no comparison with Hurley and pope two totally different situations and also pope can’t recruit not a single player. You don’t need 5 years to see a guy that can’t recruit a coach that changes his lineups every two seconds he has horrible roster building how many years does pope get it to get right ? He has coached 62 games here he’s lost 6 games at rupp worst in his first two years here which is the most a Kentucky coach has had in his first two years . He is down by double digits every single game he should have a losing record. Everyone knows Pope can not be here any real fan would see he’s just not gonna cut it .
my bad, I didn't know I was talking to a real fan lol
 

Anony Moose

Senior
Dec 2, 2025
661
817
93
Maybe not as much as you think. Hurley admitted that he had to CHANGE his coaching philosophy to turn things around at UConn. I don't know why everyone ignores this fact.

Problem with that logic is that Pope was supposed to be a mastermind coach of offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scratchycat2

preacherfan

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2003
28,517
3,753
113
Basing that on easier recruiting and name recognition. Nothing about his coaching.
I am not sure what you are seeing in the article but what I see is an overhaul of his coaching approach.


"Hurley and his assistants envisioned a movement-based offense that emphasized off-ball screening over isolation plays or traditional pick and rolls. They dreamed of a roster stuffed with high-level passers, shooters and "game processors" who could operate a system culled largely from overseas concepts. Change arrived in the form of a four-pronged plan that would touch nearly every corner of the program: from rewriting the core offensive principles to revising the player profiles used in recruiting; from reconfiguring the coaching staff's study habits to rearranging the way practice time was apportioned."
 
Last edited:

preacherfan

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2003
28,517
3,753
113
Problem with that logic is that Pope was supposed to be a mastermind coach of offense.
I wasn't talking about Pope. If I were, I would have made the point that Pope needs to make some significant changes to be successful which is EXACTLY what Hurley did, to his credit. This board has the impression that great coaches are born great. Life isn't that simple. Hurley is a living example of a coach who struggled, asked the right questions and then answered them by reinventing his approach to coaching. Tubby Smith and Cal both seeminly refused to make any changes. If Pope is still here next year, that is what I want to see happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mash_24

Anony Moose

Senior
Dec 2, 2025
661
817
93
I wasn't talking about Pope. If I were, I would have made the point that Pope needs to make some significant changes to be successful which is EXACTLY what Hurley did, to his credit. This board has the impression that great coaches are born great. Life isn't that simple. Hurley is a living example of a coach who struggled, asked the right questions and then answered them by reinventing his approach to coaching. Tubby Smith and Cal both seeminly refused to make any changes. If Pope is still here next year, that is what I want to see happen.
I mean, that might be your interpretation, but Hurley never really struggled.

In his first year at Wagner, they went 13-17. In his 2nd, they went 25-6, finished 2nd in their conference.

He then moved to RI. Took over a team that went 7-22 the year prior. He improved them each season and had a 23-10 record by year 3. He finished at RI with a 25 win and win season, winning the conference championship and then the tournament championship. He also took them to their first NCAA appearances in almost 20 years, advancing past the 1st rd both years.

He then was hired at Uconn amidst an investigation and subsequent probation. They were 14-18 the year prior to Hurley. In his 3rd year, he had them back in the tournament and finishing top 3 in the big east.

Hurley did that without the current tranfer portal or NIL.

He didn't simply become great because he evolved his offense with the current trend.

Pope has nothing in his resume to suggest he will ever be good.