I just looked up Hutzler's contract info. If I read that correctly, we guaranteed the entirety of the base pay. So we'll pay him $1mil/yr for 3 more years (or lump sum equivalent) even if we fire him this week.
Who give an unknown this contract?
So there is apparently some incorrect info out there about Hutzler's contract.
The daily journal reported this:
If MSU fires Hutzler for convenience, he would still be owed all of his remaining salary, but if Hutzler resigns, retires or takes an assistant coach position elsewhere, MSU would owe him only 50 percent of his remaining salary — and if he takes an assistant coaching job at another SEC school, MSU would only owe him 25 percent. Should Hutzler become the head coach at another institution, MSU would still be obligated to pay the entire remainder of his salary.
https://www.djournal.com/sports/col...cle_5d63d584-c9e4-11ee-a836-135960dbd70e.html
If that were correct, it would be grounds for immediate dismissal of any attorney that looked at it on behalf of MSU and also the athletic director. You'd pretty much have to be intentionally working against MSU's interest to have a contract like that.
247Sports reports a much more sane contract that I assume is correct:
If fired for convenience, Hutzler would be owed all remaining gross salary on his contract, as if it naturally expired.
If Hutzler were to resign, or take a job somewhere else, he would owe the University a payment of 50% of his remaining salary for however many years are left on his contract. If Hutzler were to take a job at another SEC program, that number increases to 75%. If Hutzler were to become a head coach, he would not have to pay back any of his contract.
https://247sports.com/college/missi...otball-assistant-coaching-salaries-226826466/
That contract is very reasonable. The buyout terms are actually pretty favorable for MSU as far as helping ensure some longevity if he's successful.
That said, if we hired a first time head coach without an agreement that he would have an experienced coordinator on the other side of the ball, that is still an awful job and something that Selmon should be called to the carpet over. If he weren't basically brand new, I would say that's a fireable offense. Just inexcusable. WIth him being new, it's still really, really bad. We just fired a coach where we saw what happens when you are inexperienced on both sides of the ball. I don't know how you just don't even take an hour to look at and discuss what went wrong with the last hire before you commit 8 figures of university money. But I don't know if you can fire a new AD for his first mistake, even if it's a really bad one like that.