615dawg said:
Citing that against common opponents, Dixon gained nearly 200 yard more than Ingram, had more touchdowns than Ingram, and averaged more per carry than Ingram, it wasn't logical. Citing that a good number of Ingram's yards came against Florida International, North Texas and Chattanooga, it wasn't logical.
You need better logic:
Against common opponents:
Ingram-8 total TD's
Dixon-8 total TD's
Ingram played a total of 6 quarters and 3 drives in the FIU, NT, and UTC games. He was actually held to under 100 yards in both the FIU and NT games. He carried the ball a grand total of 29 times for 249 yards (83 ypg) in those 3 games. Other than Auburn, those were his worst statistical games, mainly because he didnt see the field in the second half.
If you want to get them to acknowledge your logic, make sure that it is good logic.
Im not saying he deserved the award more than anyone else there. 4 of the 5 could have won and it would not have upset me at all. Gerhart had better numbers, but given the number of carries, he should have. I personally think that McCoy and Suh cancelled each other out in the Big12 game. Suh only got to New York because of that game and I believe McCoy wins the Heisman if he was not dominated by the other candidate on the last game of the year.
Dixon could very well be the best back in the SEC, but he had more carries in 2 fewer games. I personally think that is impressive to take the ball that many times. Ingram's stats suffer because of the benefit he has playing at Alabama. Alabama's depth at RB allowed them to take the load off of Ingram.
If stats are the only thing we are basing the award on, then why vote on the award? Just give it to the player with the gaudiest stats, no matter who he played or how they were attained. That will fix the problem.