Well you have the TT billionaire with the comments too. For sure there will be some who paint outside the lines like has always been the case but I think it might be curtailed somewhat from the extent that people go over the cap now because of the front loaded deals.I would take less that 5% of what comes out of Kiffins mouth as gospel.
Unless the players unionize and collective bargain, there is nothing the NCAA can do about some entity paying a player. That’s already been decided by the courts. This is window dressing to make some schools feel better about potentially competing.
The schools with the money will win like they always do and no toothless clearinghouse will be able to stop them.
I've always said lawsuits and what not could change the rules again, that's true. Collective bargaining is needed and that may happen somewhere down the line.
I also agree schools with more money will win most of the time. But I also think the pool has widened of who fits in that category now. I also think raising the floor while sort of curtailing the ceiling helps a lot more schools be competitive and while maybe not able to win the whole thing still have very good accomplishments like rankings and playoff appearances from time to time etc..Also regardless of money, roster spots and playing time will always be limited no matter how much money a school has. So some will also be motivated by that. There's a balance between money and playing time opportunity that is different for each individual.
Last edited: