ICE murders another unarmed person
- Thread starter Rastafarian
- Start date
Heavy sigh. Not the left, just not a cultist. And still glad you believe everything that you read on social media.
I don’t think I have ever said it was a clean shoot. It was an accidental shoot of which the deceased actions contributed to.
Very unfortunate. Hopefully other protesters learn the lesson.
Calling it an accident beggars belief. It's honestly less believable than "good shot". It's not like he tripped and the gun fell out and shot the guy multiple times.
fatpussy also believes that Trump and Epstein accidentally diddled kids so it doesn't count. fatpussy loves him some pedophiles and murderers.
Sortor does not speak for the Trump administration. They issued a statement. Nuff said. Accept the L and move on
dude believes Trump and Epstein accidentally molested 100 children, so accidentally shooting someone 10 times is mere child's play for fatpussy, no pun intended of course.
Seems to have close contacts in the WH so we'll see.
Nick Sortor (a conservative independent journalist and influencer with over 1.4 million followers on X as
@nicksortor) appears to have close contacts inside the White House during the current Trump administration.
Evidence from multiple sources shows a favored relationship with the administration:
- He attended a White House roundtable hosted by President Trump on "Antifa" in the State Dining Room (around October 2025), where Trump directly engaged with him (e.g., asking him for information to pursue charges related to flag burning).
- Following his arrest in Portland, Oregon (during an anti-ICE protest in October 2025), Trump personally texted him support ("Nick, I saw you on television. Great job. We are behind you 100%. Let us know if there is anything we can do…"), and the White House publicly defended him.
- White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt described his arrest as "extremely troubling," claimed he was ambushed by Antifa while documenting events, and highlighted concerns about press freedom.
- The administration (including AG Pam Bondi) reportedly launched or ordered investigations tied to his incidents (e.g., into Portland Police after his arrest, as he claimed Bondi confirmed to him directly).
- Reports describe him as having "White House ties" and a "close relationship with the administration," including being amplified or supported in official channels.
- He has referenced White House statements or actions in his posts (e.g., updates on Air Force One issues "per the White House," or sharing White House videos), and he received a Secret Service patch after assisting near the White House.
He is connected but he was wrong this time imo. I support Bovino going to another state and bringing in homan in at this time. Deportations will continue. This is an insurrection and you should be ashamed to support it.
Tricia McLaughlin Yoho is attractive but, man, is she dumb. She might even be as dumb as Hermy McFluffins.
Watters: President Trump has already REMOVED 10,000 illegals from Minneapolis.That’s not just enforcement — that’s an entire congressional district wiped off the map.
No wonder Democrats are panicking.
Fewer illegals means fewer rigged districts, fewer fake “votes,” and less power for the radical left.
This is what REAL border enforcement looks like.
Keep going. America is watching.
nope, not, but where I think he is right, I.e., he agrees with me, I'm a trump supporter. But on issues where he's wrong, I.e., he doesn't agree with me, not a trump supporter. As I have said, I'm AC/DC (not in the bear/Knox way) when it comes to politics, have voted both D and R , based on policies and benefits. I'm not like Flaw47 who says he votes democrat...period. And maybe like you, who based on our years on Blue white and here, might mirror flaw.
Some of you guys can't seem to get your heads around the simple fact that everything Trump does is not bad....he actually does some good things (law of averages maybe). Heck, I even think that Biden and Obama did some good things (law of averages again). So to those folks I appear to be all over the map...not so...I have my opinions/beliefs/ views and they don't track a democrats or republican platform. It is possible to a politician to be right sometimes and wrong others.
OK, back to my legal question...JAG officer, all lawyers, have been "seconded" to serve as immigration judges...went to school to learn the laws and did whatever you have to do to become a judge. They are still military, and I have no idea of the chain of command (who they report to). OK never mind..I asked my second most favorite lawyer, Google AI, and immigration judges cannot issue judicial warrants only administrative
Well, it wasn't a comment really worthy of rebuttal.
The events leading to the shooting appear to be accidental. That is, i believe the gun unintentionally discharged causing the other agent to appropriately defend himself. Each of the 10 shots was not accidental, the situation was accidental. But everyone knows that, and that is why it was a troll question in which a well thought out response was not needed.
But he could have been in the future so better to kill him now.
I have voted for Republicans before, does that reduce my bias by 95%?
attractive Trump's smarts
based on that logic we should all be killed now, including the last person standing.
nah, you've gone too far over the edge..no coming back for you
. Although if there's hope, I'll keep working on youwell, just for accuracy, not everyone knows the shooting or situation was accidental. I, for one, don't and I could give you a slew of names from on here - starting with Flaw47, Layfayttebear who don't either.
Now, I'll wait for the results of an investigation, but the two I've named have already determined that the shooting was out and out murder.
not being argumentative, just striving for accuratcy
I'm not claiming everyone knows the shooting was accidental.
I'm claiming one should be able to infer from my comments that I was not referring to each individual shot being an accident (I don't think the gun accidentally fired 10 times. This should be obvious.) I was referring to the whole situation as a whole as an accident.
Aren't police trained to shoot center mass to kill? He was well within is authority to defend himself in that situation. Law enforcement aren't sitting ducks. He heard "gun!, gun!" from a friendly agent, and saw a perp on the ground struggling for :10 seconds plus, and then saw the protester seemingly reach for his gun on his waist.
Whether that is what actually happened or not, it is reasonable from the video to say that the officer reasonably thought that is what happened. It was reasonable, because of all the commotion and interference the protesters were causing. The whistles, the pushing and shoving, the yelling, the resisting, the possession of the gun (He violated the terms of his carry license when approaching and being aggressive with the officer).
So, i will always maintain the officers right to defend himself in that situation. I also don't believe anyone should be killed for protesting. No one should be killed for resisting arrest. No one should be killed for carrying a firearm. This is why i call the shooting an accident.
Last edited:
nah, you've gone too far over the edge..no coming back for you
When's the last time you voted for a Democrat for federal office?
I'm not debating, and I don't think anyone else would either, the officer's right to defend himself.
But, I just don't think I'm at a position to agree this pretti shooting was accidental, (the situation was being at the wrong place, wrong time, wrong actions of 2 people) . I have not seen anything that leads me to believe I have any accurate idea of what happened. I've read, from people who believe they firmly know what happened but unfortunately opinions/facts range from your accidental to Flaw47's murder.
Go ahead and quote me saying it was a murder. You're making a lot of assumptions about what other people believe and stating it as fact (bias!?). Weirdly this only seems to be something you do to the left of center folks. Can't figure out why that'd be (bias!?).
2020...moved then to florida and in 2022 voted for Rubio, in 2024 voted for Scott. Now, if you saw the Democratic candidate put up in both those elections, even you would have voted Republican. Have voted for democrats presidential candidates Clinton, Kerry (I knew him), Obama, (I knew Mccain, couldn't vote for him)
Had I lived in Pa - my previous state, I would have voted for Shapiro...Republican candidate was weak, IMO
So do I get any credit for having voted Republican as recently as 2012? I've also voted for Republicans in primaries much more recently than that, does that count?
What I don't understand is why you think me having a hard time voting for a Republican anytime soon means I'm irreparably biased. I have my values and the current Republican party does not represent them at all. I'm happy to spell out my values and you can tell me why I'm wrong on that.
Voting against my values wouldn't make me unbiased, it'd make me a moron.
Not just murder but Government sponsored murder. All Americans should fear for the future of this country as long as fascists are running it.
Exactly. Now maybe you're starting to understand how dangerous it is to say someone showed up to do something (as an assassin/ to commit mass murder / to inflict maximum damage) without the proof to back it up, yet he was treated as though he had actually committed one of those actions.
first things first... I think you're biased, because in one of your posts you said you were biased. I don't think irreparably, I still have hope for you. We still have 3 years for you to discover one thing where you'll agree with Trump
Of course you get credit for voting Republican....but not for voting Republican, but for picking who you thought would be best for the country and yourself.
We all have our values. And, i'd bet (figuratively) that not everyone who voted either for or against Trump has equal values. We're all different. As I posted at least once before, my wife is a total, total Trump supporter...she's like an counter Flaw47....she and I don't see eye to eye on everything either, but I still love her. People disagree and that doesn't mean the other is a Nazi, fascist, moron or other (not that you've called anyone else those) it just means they disagree.
Based on some of your posts where you mention your wife, I'd bet your loveable also....misguided but loveable