If we lose.

ApexLion

All-American
Nov 1, 2021
5,230
8,858
113
Maybe I'm looking at this the wrong way but it sure looks to me like PSU has gone in the last 15 years from a mess of a program on the periphery of the top 25 to a solid top 10 program, maybe top 5, likely regular playoff team, one of the elite factories for NFL talent, maybe on the verge of being one of the superprograms like Ohio State and Michigan and Oregon that contend for championships and rule college football. Correct me if I'm wrong about this but I think the guy who's run the PSU football program during this long rise has been a guy named James Franklin. And he's done it without cheating. And people here are saying they want to fire him if the team loses a football game on Saturday. Hmmm.
I think people here ought to be worried about losing Franklin if PSU doesn't surpass last year's success but it will be because some other place wants to hire him for a truckload of money to do what he's done at PSU. And if he were to leave, the odds are frankly not great that his successor would be as successful. If you want to see PSU continue to rise (and rising is harder the higher you get), I think your best odds would be to stay with the guy who has rebuilt the program to where it is. I've been a college football fan for nearly 60 years and that would be my long-term perspective.
long-term perspective, pfft, this is the BWIAKB filled with BWIAKCoaches.

Torches are in hand and its only Thursday!
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVilleLion23

ApexLion

All-American
Nov 1, 2021
5,230
8,858
113
The pitchforks are presently being sharpened and will be ready by 09:00 tomorrow, Friday.
I seriously laughed a stomach laugh when the premium board goobers tried to say Franklin was awful because the Lions aren't playing in all white road uniforms during this whiteout. How do people come up with this shiat? What synapses fire off?

On a serious note, all of us on this board know (admit it, even you cynics) that if PSU wanted to go all in on spending, cheating SEC style, and generally becoming a top 5 football factory, we could have done it long ago. But that isn't what the vast majority ever wanted because it would be a hollow victory symbolized by a meaningless trophy. Now, the younger generation may be fine with being just like everyone else salivating over being no. 1 at any costs and they may get that someday. For now, Franklin has been a stand up guy, building the program within the rules. Do I think he should be fired if he loses another big game? Nah. We can argue about coaching but with each loss it's much more likely the lack of horses are the issue imho.

My advice fwiw. Sit back and enjoy the show, win or lose.
 

LionJim

Heisman
Oct 12, 2021
12,836
17,761
113
I seriously laughed a stomach laugh when the premium board goobers tried to say Franklin was awful because the Lions aren't playing in all white road uniforms during this whiteout. How do people come up with this shiat? What synapses fire off?

On a serious note, all of us on this board know (admit it, even you cynics) that if PSU wanted to go all in on spending, cheating SEC style, and generally becoming a top 5 football factory, we could have done it long ago. But that isn't what the vast majority ever wanted because it would be a hollow victory symbolized by a meaningless trophy. Now, the younger generation may be fine with being just like everyone else salivating over being no. 1 at any costs and they may get that someday. For now, Franklin has been a stand up guy, building the program within the rules. Do I think he should be fired if he loses another big game? Nah. We can argue about coaching but with each loss it's much more likely the lack of horses are the issue imho.

My advice fwiw. Sit back and enjoy the show, win or lose.
I am agog at your first paragraph. Holy ****.
 
Sep 10, 2013
16,321
11,806
113
There's maybe a 5% chance of that happening. PSU should not be putting the fate of a their program on something with odds akin to the spin of a roulette wheel when they are already in a position better than 90-95% of programs in the sport.
Last sentence is straight go state beat hen’s rhetoric
 

Classof09

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
1,072
2,185
113
And also likely because you (Rick) move the goalposts in the discussion all the ******* time.
And that’s just as annoying as the schtick of talking like some wannabe 19 year old egomaniac with the abbreviations and 3rd person stuff.
 

LionJim

Heisman
Oct 12, 2021
12,836
17,761
113
And that’s just as annoying as the schtick of talking like some wannabe 19 year old egomaniac with the abbreviations and 3rd person stuff.
That part doesn’t bother me but one’s mileage will vary. One other thing is that you never know whether or not he’s drunk posting, that definitely doesn’t do a whole lot for our comprehension.

Rick, this might seem harsh but you asked. Happy to oblige, lol. You made the bed. Maybe before posting try to predict how posters will respond, that’s a life skill everyone should have.

I do really dig the way you (Rick) talk about your family, though. I see a lot of love, good for you, our kids deserve it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: laKavosiey-st lion
Sep 10, 2013
16,321
11,806
113
And also likely because you (Rick) move the goalposts in the discussion all the ******* time. In this respect, you are a real outlier on this board, just saying.
Fitting on has always been important to me. I will try starting Sunday.
 

leinbacker

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
2,272
3,620
113
Good post and for the most part, I've taken this position. Sort of "the devil you know." If Franklin loses this game and Ohio State, I think it is a reasonable position to take the other side. Look, for a long time he couldn't win as an underdog because the program was not "all in, 365 days a year." He couldn't win the big one because the administration wouldn't pony up for top level coordinators and coaches. On record, I don't think he was wrong....I do remember losing coaches, good coaches, to lateral moves. That said, nobody can argue the investments being made to the program at this point. Knowles is the highest paid coordinator in the country, school is redoing beaver stadium, deals being cut all over with jersey brands, insurance companies, and so on. They paid up and brought back high level/experienced talent and in order to do so, flashed big coin. Considering the exodus of players leaving next year, and the relatively paltry 2026 recruiting status, we are probably 2-4 years away from being real NC threats again...Franklin will be in like year 20 at that point. I think its fair to say "if not now......when?" and if he loses to OSU and OU this year, he'll have deserved that no?

So back to your original point....Do you eliminate a guy that wins a lot of games knowing you risk winning less games if only, you MIGHT strike lightening in the bottle and marry a "lesser known" coach to the program and he can reach a ceiling never realized under Franklin? I'll even concede the probability stipulates he won't and worse, will underperform Franklin. Is that a risk the fans and administration are willing to take? If Franklin goes 0-2 this year, god forbid he loses to Indiana too(real chance).....I think I'd say Yes, time to try something knew. Hat tip to Franklin, has done a wonderful job, but he's basically Mike Tomlin(w/o a ring) at that point.....long term coach, good enough to keep the stands full, the cash flowing, deserves respect, but just couldn't get there and the potential downsides, and they are vast(think Fickell at Wisconsin), are worth it to me. Not that Franklin gets fired, but I do think Kraft and Franklin could be reasonable in at least beginning to formulate a next plan for both him and the program. Just my $.02.

There is no guarantee that Franklin keeps his 10-2 streak alive either, it is not a given. Look at the talent that will be lost after this season, 2026 could easily be a 7-5 team.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Knickslions69

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
2,204
1,499
113
Or you can go from a Solich (can do better) to a Pelini (can do better) to a Riley (can do better) to a Frost (can do better) to Rhule (not a great first two seasons and too early to tell about this season and beyond).

Yeah, maybe PSU can get someone else that would get us back to a NC, but I would say odds are similar record as Franklin or worse.

🤷‍♂️
Agreed...there's risk but when you get to the point you know the current guy isn't good enough to win a title you have to make a move. Not saying we're there yet but he has to start winning big games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacNit

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
2,204
1,499
113
There's maybe a 5% chance of that happening. PSU should not be putting the fate of a their program on something with odds akin to the spin of a roulette wheel when they are already in a position better than 90-95% of programs in the sport.
Depends on what is the goal. It's like the Steelers...do you keep Tomlin and stay competitive while knowing you're never going to win or do you want to be elite? I take risks...I get the conservative approach.

Best thing Georgia ever did was fire Richt and they hired a well respected coordinator not even a proven HC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacNit
Oct 31, 2001
123
89
28
Go ahead and vent if that’s what you think you need today. None of us are immune to the anxiety.

If we win, we’re a lock to the playoffs. Those are the stakes this weekend, it’s there staring at us in the face.
No anxiety with low expectations.
 
Oct 31, 2001
123
89
28
Maybe I'm looking at this the wrong way but it sure looks to me like PSU has gone in the last 15 years from a mess of a program on the periphery of the top 25 to a solid top 10 program, maybe top 5, likely regular playoff team, one of the elite factories for NFL talent, maybe on the verge of being one of the superprograms like Ohio State and Michigan and Oregon that contend for championships and rule college football. Correct me if I'm wrong about this but I think the guy who's run the PSU football program during this long rise has been a guy named James Franklin. And he's done it without cheating. And people here are saying they want to fire him if the team loses a football game on Saturday. Hmmm.
I think people here ought to be worried about losing Franklin if PSU doesn't surpass last year's success but it will be because some other place wants to hire him for a truckload of money to do what he's done at PSU. And if he were to leave, the odds are frankly not great that his successor would be as successful. If you want to see PSU continue to rise (and rising is harder the higher you get), I think your best odds would be to stay with the guy who has rebuilt the program to where it is. I've been a college football fan for nearly 60 years and that would be my long-term perspective.
You have to beat top ten to be top ten. Which Franklin is incapable of.
 
Sep 10, 2013
16,321
11,806
113
Best thing Georgia ever did was fire Richt and they hired a well respected coordinator not even a proven HC.

are we on the same side? I just don’t know at all
 

PSUForever

Senior
Feb 17, 2007
669
594
93
He
Sounds like Dabo right now. The reality is with the team he has this year anything short of a deep playoff run is an epic failure.

Yes there's risk but you could also go from Richt to Smart. The objective is to win titles.

Not saying fire him if we lose to Oregon but if we fail to make the playoff he should be gone.
He has his job until that buyout goes under $20 million if not under $10 million so probably 5 more years. Unfortunately he can lose all the big games he wants until it becomes a reasonable financial decision to can him.
 
Sep 10, 2013
16,321
11,806
113
He

He has his job until that buyout goes under $20 million if not under $10 million so probably 5 more years. Unfortunately he can lose all the big games he wants until it becomes a reasonable financial decision to can him.
So 3 big games a year x 5 years could yield a 3-14 record. oh well
 

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
2,204
1,499
113
He

He has his job until that buyout goes under $20 million if not under $10 million so probably 5 more years. Unfortunately he can lose all the big games he wants until it becomes a reasonable financial decision to can him.
Most likely that's true but to keep someone in a role to avoid the buyout doesn't make sense. We've seen other programs move on. We can afford it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacNit

thoss

Sophomore
Aug 7, 2025
46
101
33
Depends on what is the goal. It's like the Steelers...do you keep Tomlin and stay competitive while knowing you're never going to win or do you want to be elite? I take risks...I get the conservative approach.

Best thing Georgia ever did was fire Richt and they hired a well respected coordinator not even a proven HC.
Definitely worked out for Georgia but it's much more common for programs to scuffle along for a while, sometimes many years, till they find their guy. The best example of course being Nebraska. But Alabama and Texas also had a lot of years of mediocrity (by their standards). When Franklin leaves (and I think he will, when he's ready for another challenge) there's a risk that PSU would fall into the middle regions of the B1G for an extended period of time. Franklin is a very big reason why PSU recruits at the level it does. That said, be careful what you wish for, if Franklin were to break through this year and get his championship, NFL teams could be knocking on the door.
 

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
2,204
1,499
113
Definitely worked out for Georgia but it's much more common for programs to scuffle along for a while, sometimes many years, till they find their guy. The best example of course being Nebraska. But Alabama and Texas also had a lot of years of mediocrity (by their standards). When Franklin leaves (and I think he will, when he's ready for another challenge) there's a risk that PSU would fall into the middle regions of the B1G for an extended period of time. Franklin is a very big reason why PSU recruits at the level it does. That said, be careful what you wish for, if Franklin were to break through this year and get his championship, NFL teams could be knocking on the door.
I think most people accept Nebraska's issues had a lot to do with joining the Big Ten.
Alabama and Texas did have down years but it kind of worked out--especially Saban/Bama. We'll see Sark/Texas
If we win a championship and he moves on I'll wish him the best--I'm confident we'll be fine. Just like I didn't blame O'Brien for leaving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bid D from Philly

PSUForever

Senior
Feb 17, 2007
669
594
93
Most likely that's true but to keep someone in a role to avoid the buyout doesn't make sense. We've seen other programs move on. We can afford it.
I think Okie State ponied up $15 million to get rid of Gundy. I can see us doing that or maybe more like possibly $25 million for example if he turns into a train wreck and starts missing the playoffs every season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KingLando

fastlax16

Junior
Jan 1, 2014
279
342
63
I think most people accept Nebraska's issues had a lot to do with joining the Big Ten.
Alabama and Texas did have down years but it kind of worked out--especially Saban/Bama. We'll see Sark/Texas
If we win a championship and he moves on I'll wish him the best--I'm confident we'll be fine. Just like I didn't blame O'Brien for leaving.
Nebraska's first 4 seasons in the conference were 9-4, 10-4, 9-4, 9-4. Pelini's win % when Nebraska was a member of the Big 12 was .707. As a member of the big ten he was .711. The wheels didn't fall off completely until 2017, 7 years into their membership...
 

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
2,204
1,499
113
Nebraska's first 4 seasons in the conference were 9-4, 10-4, 9-4, 9-4. Pelini's win % when Nebraska was a member of the Big 12 was .707. As a member of the big ten he was .711. The wheels didn't fall off completely until 2017, 7 years into their membership...
They had at least 3 conference losses every year but 2012 when the basically played no one decent other than Ohio State. Both Penn State and Michigan were subpar that year. 9 wins seasons, especially counting the scrimmage of a bowl game, isn't impressive.
You're discounting the entire time they were in the Big 8 before they added 4 schools? The Big 8/Big XII is interchangable.
They used to recruit very well in Texas--joining the Big Ten hurt that.
The wheels completely fell off because of bad hiring decisions but they were never relevant in the Big Ten.
 

fastlax16

Junior
Jan 1, 2014
279
342
63
They had at least 3 conference losses every year but 2012 when the basically played no one decent other than Ohio State. Both Penn State and Michigan were subpar that year. 9 wins seasons, especially counting the scrimmage of a bowl game, isn't impressive.
You're discounting the entire time they were in the Big 8 before they added 4 schools? The Big 8/Big XII is interchangable.
They used to recruit very well in Texas--joining the Big Ten hurt that.
The wheels completely fell off because of bad hiring decisions but they were never relevant in the Big Ten.

Whatever Nebraska was in 1995 before the big 8 expanded was gone well before they joined the big ten. They'd only won the conference twice since the expansion and hadn't since 1999. They may have never been relevant in the big ten but they'd already been irrelevant for over a decade in the big 12.

Pelini's big 12 win percentage was .708, which dropped dramatically to, checks notes, .688 in the big ten. The big 12 north wasn't exactly murderers row. 2008 Oklahoma was their only regular season conference opponent during Pelini's tenure that finished ranked in final AP top 10. They played one every season after joining. 2011 Wisconsin, 2012 OSU, 2013 MSU and 2014 MSU.
 

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
2,204
1,499
113
Whatever Nebraska was in 1995 before the big 8 expanded was gone well before they joined the big ten. They'd only won the conference twice since the expansion and hadn't since 1999. They may have never been relevant in the big ten but they'd already been irrelevant for over a decade in the big 12.

Pelini's big 12 win percentage was .708, which dropped dramatically to, checks notes, .688 in the big ten. The big 12 north wasn't exactly murderers row. 2008 Oklahoma was their only regular season conference opponent during Pelini's tenure that finished ranked in final AP top 10. They played one every season after joining. 2011 Wisconsin, 2012 OSU, 2013 MSU and 2014 MSU.
That's all great but doesn't refute my point. Not sure what argument you think you're making here. Nebraska's recruiting was limited after joining the Big Ten and the results reflect that. It even makes more sense they were subpar 4 loss teams the first couple years until the impact of recruiting became evident.
 

PSUHarry

All-Conference
Jul 15, 2003
1,246
1,377
113
Rick is legit PSU.
50/50 on that. He equates his loyalty to spending on PSU tuition. His first instinct it to pontificate on PSU Football without facts, as they get in the way. No understanding the bigger picture, the true landscape of college football, of what the program can achieve with current resources and talent, or who out there could come for the same money and get us to the promised land. It's just a lazy approach. Save your breath, he ain't listening.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: LionJim

Midnighter

Heisman
Jan 22, 2021
11,024
17,744
113
50/50 on that. He equates his loyalty to spending on PSU tuition. His first instinct it to pontificate on PSU Football without facts, as they get in the way. No understanding the bigger picture, the true landscape of college football, of what the program can achieve with current resources and talent, or who out there could come for the same money and get us to the promised land. It's just a lazy approach. Save your breath, he ain't listening.

You and The Rick?!


zach woods jared dunn GIF by hero0fwar
 
  • Haha
Reactions: laKavosiey-st lion