Lester Munson who is ESPN's legal analyst said yesterday that Sark has a very strong case and said if USC was wise they would initiate settlement talks. He thinks USC would lose in court.Just because he is suing doesn't mean he will win. Likely, he is hoping they will settle out of court rather than go to trial.
I think this is a really bad move on his part. Playing the victim role will likely cause schools to not want to hire him as a coach.
Yes. Yes you can. The main issue though is the disability paycheck would be next to nothing compared to the taxes you would have to.........never mind. Yeah man, go for it! It's only money.Does this mean that if live in California and catch alcoholism you can file for early disability?
i went back and read the story. I wonder if part of the "leave of absence" he agreed to take was supposed to include his return to being a head coach after completing treatment.Lester Munson who is ESPN's legal analyst said yesterday that Sark has a very strong case and said if USC was wise they would initiate settlement talks. He thinks USC would lose in court.
Just because he is suing doesn't mean he will win. Likely, he is hoping they will settle out of court rather than go to trial.
I think this is a really bad move on his part. Playing the victim role will likely cause schools to not want to hire him as a coach.
Good thing for him because I can't see too many FBS schools beating down the door of a guy who shows up drunk at work and sues his former employer.Honestly at this point I think he could careless about another head coaching job. I'm thinking he's hoping to get enough from this buyout to at least live comfortably. Maybe 5-10 years later down the road he gets an assistant job.