If you take an objective look at what Rep Nunes did today, how can ....
- Thread starter Original Mountaineer1
- Start date
We were reminded a couple weeks go that the one person in DC who would have access to any information -- The President of US.
Everything about this is a **** up from Biff feloniously accusing Obama to Nunes end running the intel committee. Heads need to roll.
You libs have resorted to lying. This evidence had ZERO to do with Russia. ZERO. How then is Trump not entitled to know that his transition team and possibly himself was surveilled (having NOTHING to do with the Russians). The investigation is about possible Russian collusion with the Trump campaign. This had nothing to do with that. Why is this simply fact so hard for libs to comprehend?
Actually it is solid because Nunes will share that intelligence with the full committee including Dems. If he lied, the Dems will let us know. I think it is 100% true, this had nothing to do with the Russians.
These matters seem to be over your head but follow along as best you can. Looks like we need an independent prosecutor.
Schiff: ‘More Than Circumstantial Evidence’ Trump Associates Colluded With Russia
"The chairman will need to decide whether he is the chairman of an independent investigation into conduct, which includes allegations of potential coordination between the Trump campaign and the Russians, or he's going to act as a surrogate of the White House. Because he cannot do both," Schiff said.
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/23/schi...ce-trump-associates-colluded-with-russia.html
OK, so what does this mean, given that Manafort was Trump's campaign director? Woudn't that prove collusion or coordination or whatever you want to call it between Trump's campaign and a foreign government? If so, then what?
It would prove Manafort was money laundering unrelated to Russia, was investigated outside of the Russia investigation, and that intelligence was leaked. This fits all of the parameters that have been given to us lately.
Obviously the House investigation can't do their job when the Republican chair is acting as the so called prez's attorney and runs to him whenever they find something of concern. Nunes has proven that he can't be impartial and being a former member of Trump's transition team he has shown where his loyalties lie. At a miniumum, Nunes needs to step down and better yet an independent commission needs to be set up.
There was no court order, Obama said it never happened, yet Biff said it did. All that's left is something covert and illegal.
Obama said he did not order the surveillance. That may be true. He DID NOT say he did not know about the surveillance or that he was not briefed on it. Big difference.
No, Nunes updated the President about surveillance of his transition team (not involving any Russian investigation). Perfectly legitimate. I agree he should have shared this intel with Schiff before meeting with the President. But he did nothing illegal or even questionable in terms of sharing information. My only quibble is with the sequence of events.
We were fvcked as a nation when Wilson started with the socialism and FDR expanded it. we really got hosed when LBJ started the great society which is more of a great breakdown of the family.
So I guess you think that if you say this enough that it will be true? That's all I can figure.
You love to pull out the socialism card as much as atl loves to pull out the abortion card.
I have no problem with govt providing police, roads, garbage pickup, shools, but welfare has caused the breakdown of the family that we will never recover from. Daycare, having people bring their kids to school at a too early age, takes away the parents responsibilty to take care of them. Everything that socialism does, indoctrinates the kids to govt can take care of you better than your parents.
Do you think complete strangers are better equipped to form your children's minds and values? It can work both ways, you can get someone who agrees with your views or diametrically opposed. Pot luck.
I stay at home. But some couples both want careers, some parents need two incomes to live well and retire safely, and some single parents have no choice. I'd rather money go towards giving those kids the best care possible. It ain't 1950 out there any more.
Yes, and who's fault is that? The congress for taking more and more taxes to support worthless programs.
Geez, I'm not so sure about that. Cost of housing, cable, beer, toys, vacations, cars.....look at what it costs to take your kids to a movie or baseball game. Costs on insurance? Roll the clock back 40 years and tell me costs and income are both comparable to today's.
But you're right: congress (both sides of the aisle) has failed to help anyone really