IHSA competitive balance committee minutes

Cross Bones

All-Conference
Aug 19, 2001
52,910
3,981
113
Posted from IHSA board summary


Feel like we've been down this road before...but anyone interested can see who is on committee and what they are looking at.
@cornerrat#1 will be glad they are looking at population density with regards to the 30 mile radius. He brought that up over a decade ago saying it gave Chicago area private schools an advantage over SHG (for example) after a drubbing at the hands of JCA. I did ask him to expand on this idea to no avail. Not sure why he doesnt want to discuss it.
 

cornerrat#1

Senior
Jul 1, 2025
476
456
63
@cornerrat#1 will be glad they are looking at population density with regards to the 30 mile radius. He brought that up over a decade ago saying it gave Chicago area private schools an advantage over SHG (for example) after a drubbing at the hands of JCA. I did ask him to expand on this idea to no avail. Not sure why he doesnt want to discuss it.
All.... Your ever morphing narrative.... Oh I saw that post a few months ago on this board that seems to be now unavailable. In that one you had me confused with Birdwatcher and his sliding scale proposal.... Go figure. lol Cling away if it helps you sleep at night. Ratsy P.S. God bless our law enforcement heroes that hold the line everyday against rampant criminality.
 

Cross Bones

All-Conference
Aug 19, 2001
52,910
3,981
113
All.... Your ever morphing narrative.... Oh I saw that post a few months ago on this board that seems to be now unavailable. In that one you had me confused with Birdwatcher and his sliding scale proposal.... Go figure. lol Cling away if it helps you sleep at night. Ratsy P.S. God bless our law enforcement heroes that hold the line everyday against rampant criminality.
Oh no, I've been asking you to expand on your population density issue ever since you brought it up after the tin man showed up at a playoff game in 2011 in Joliet. You've ducked and dodged it every time to the point where now you pretend you didn't bring it up at all 🤣
 

Colin2299

Junior
Aug 13, 2025
289
217
43
The only thing the IHSA can do to stop privates from continuing on their dominance is separate them.

Mt Carmel is 8A and you can't do anything else to them to stop them from winning at the rate they are winning at.

You can change the radius all you want but those kids aren't going to their local public school. They will just go to another private. Mt Carmel will just get kids closer.

You can bump Montini up and they will just get better and another private will rise up and take their place.
 

cornerrat#1

Senior
Jul 1, 2025
476
456
63
Oh no, I've been asking you to expand on your population density issue ever since you brought it up after the tin man showed up at a playoff game in 2011 in Joliet. You've ducked and dodged it every time to the point where now you pretend you didn't bring it up at all 🤣
All.... I can't help you out if my replies are not to your liking and after all these years still crave my attention. You might want to work on that by the way having graciously awarding you with two responses. Have a pleasant day! Ratsy
 

Cross Bones

All-Conference
Aug 19, 2001
52,910
3,981
113
All.... I can't help you out if my replies are not to your liking and after all these years still crave my attention. You might want to work on that by the way having graciously awarding you with two responses. Have a pleasant day! Ratsy
Who mentioned like? Its just funny watching you hide from your own positions. Its entertaining making you dance like a puppet.
 

Colin2299

Junior
Aug 13, 2025
289
217
43
What's the IHSA's answer to the below? This is an 8A program who used to be a top 10 program and their baseball used to be top 5. Now both programs are below .500 programs.

Is it the private schools fault?
What can the IHSA put in place to give this public a better shot at winning?


1774289666207.png
 

4Afan

All-Conference
Sep 15, 2001
3,908
3,501
113
What's the IHSA's answer to the below? This is an 8A program who used to be a top 10 program and their baseball used to be top 5. Now both programs are below .500 programs.

Is it the private schools fault?
What can the IHSA put in place to give this public a better shot at winning?


View attachment 1228852
I wouldn't say it's private school's or anyone else's fault, but as the demographics started to change it's possible that those athletes that made this school a top 10 football school and top 5 baseball school decided to look elsewhere to keep playing competitively.
 

PowerI66

Senior
Jul 10, 2025
614
516
93
What's the IHSA's answer to the below? This is an 8A program who used to be a top 10 program and their baseball used to be top 5. Now both programs are below .500 programs.

Is it the private schools fault?
What can the IHSA put in place to give this public a better shot at winning?


View attachment 1228852
The reasons are not mutually exclusive. Demographics, coaching, private options, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4Afan

Colin2299

Junior
Aug 13, 2025
289
217
43
I wouldn't say it's private school's or anyone else's fault, but as the demographics started to change it's possible that those athletes that made this school a top 10 football school and top 5 baseball school decided to look elsewhere to keep playing competitively.
I agree - so what is the IHSA to do to solve this?

Is it right to change the rules because of this?
 

mc140

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
8,798
2,852
113
Separation is the only solution. Privates wont leave. They can not play nicely with each other.
 

4Afan

All-Conference
Sep 15, 2001
3,908
3,501
113
I agree - so what is the IHSA to do to solve this?

Is it right to change the rules because of this?
I think that's what this committee is tasked to do. There are 15 committee members with 5 of them being from private schools so they have representation.
 

SiuCubFan8

All-Conference
Jul 27, 2007
5,749
3,607
113
I feel like we have entered a scenario where nothing except separation will appease the loud vocal public schools.
I know all public schools do not want it.
I know all private schools do not want it.
But the bitching will never stop.
The gap is only going to get wider between top programs and the rest of state (public and private). Private schools benefit more from the new age NIL era, not to say public schools are not in some cases, they are.

I don't want it but I have no say. Those are my thoughts.
 

ramblinman reborn

Sophomore
Aug 15, 2025
92
110
33
I think that many public school fans and school administrators are knee-jerk in favor of separation, without really having thought things through.

Be careful what you wish for.

IF the decision is to separate, who is included in that separation? Privates and non-boundaried publics? If so, what if one party or the other doesn't like or want that?

If the non-boundaried publics don't go along with it, then what? Is the IHSA really going to force public schools like Payton, Simeon, and Young to compete in a championship division composed primarily of private schools? I always felt like the public school dominated IHSA treated their non-boundaried public school brethren like pawns with its multipliers, success factors, etc. so the IHSA could make it look like it wasn't being biased against faith-based schools. If the IHSA takes non-boundaried publics back in the fold and separates out the private schools, then what are the optics of that? If that happens, how does the IHSA defend their decision to treat non-boundaried public schools like the private schools in the first place?

If private schools don't go along with it, and they reveal the NIPL just for themselves to play with, what about the non-boundaried public schools? Are they still separated out? Do they get welcomed back in with all the other publics? If the former, that's even more ridiculous than including them in the first place along with the privates. If the latter, doesn't that call into question why the non-boundaried schools needed to be lumped in with the private schools in the first place? Not a good look for the IHSA in either case.

Let's assume for a moment that both privates and non-publics get separated and they both go along with it and both decide to remain in the IHSA. In that scenario, what happens to the multiplier and success factor and God knows whatever other discriminatory rules that the whiners called for to water down private school competitiveness vis-a-vis public schools? Do those continue? If so, that's ridiculous. There was some world-class public school whining that took place to enact those rules! Now that those whiners got their way with separation, there is no reason to hold back the private school competitiveness any longer. RIGHT?

I raised this point recently in a different thread, but what happens if private schools stay in the IHSA in a separate championship division? Are non-con games between public and private schools allowed? More to the point, do they COUNT in terms of playoff qualification and seeding?

Lastly, I think the general assumption among public schools and their fans is that private schools would be content to stay in the IHSA and separated into their own class either with them alone or with non-boundaried public schools. Honestly, I would like to think that private schools would show some backbone in a case like that and tell the IHSA to go pound sand where the sun doesn't shine. Why would the private schools want to stay in an athletic association governed and effectively run by public schools and compete for private school championships only? Might as well just start their own athletic association at that point and be free from the path of least resistance and scapegoat seeking whiners who would rather legislate their way to titles than to work harder for them. Yes, I said work harder. It CAN be done!

I SO wish that private schools would just pull out the NIPL and be done with it. Be done with all those discriminatory rules and generate a better product than the IHSA that panders to the whiners and the least common denominator.
 

jha618

All-Conference
Jan 1, 2018
3,428
4,030
113
I think that many public school fans and school administrators are knee-jerk in favor of separation, without really having thought things through.

Be careful what you wish for.

IF the decision is to separate, who is included in that separation? Privates and non-boundaried publics? If so, what if one party or the other doesn't like or want that?

If the non-boundaried publics don't go along with it, then what? Is the IHSA really going to force public schools like Payton, Simeon, and Young to compete in a championship division composed primarily of private schools? I always felt like the public school dominated IHSA treated their non-boundaried public school brethren like pawns with its multipliers, success factors, etc. so the IHSA could make it look like it wasn't being biased against faith-based schools. If the IHSA takes non-boundaried publics back in the fold and separates out the private schools, then what are the optics of that? If that happens, how does the IHSA defend their decision to treat non-boundaried public schools like the private schools in the first place?

If private schools don't go along with it, and they reveal the NIPL just for themselves to play with, what about the non-boundaried public schools? Are they still separated out? Do they get welcomed back in with all the other publics? If the former, that's even more ridiculous than including them in the first place along with the privates. If the latter, doesn't that call into question why the non-boundaried schools needed to be lumped in with the private schools in the first place? Not a good look for the IHSA in either case.

Let's assume for a moment that both privates and non-publics get separated and they both go along with it and both decide to remain in the IHSA. In that scenario, what happens to the multiplier and success factor and God knows whatever other discriminatory rules that the whiners called for to water down private school competitiveness vis-a-vis public schools? Do those continue? If so, that's ridiculous. There was some world-class public school whining that took place to enact those rules! Now that those whiners got their way with separation, there is no reason to hold back the private school competitiveness any longer. RIGHT?

I raised this point recently in a different thread, but what happens if private schools stay in the IHSA in a separate championship division? Are non-con games between public and private schools allowed? More to the point, do they COUNT in terms of playoff qualification and seeding?

Lastly, I think the general assumption among public schools and their fans is that private schools would be content to stay in the IHSA and separated into their own class either with them alone or with non-boundaried public schools. Honestly, I would like to think that private schools would show some backbone in a case like that and tell the IHSA to go pound sand where the sun doesn't shine. Why would the private schools want to stay in an athletic association governed and effectively run by public schools and compete for private school championships only? Might as well just start their own athletic association at that point and be free from the path of least resistance and scapegoat seeking whiners who would rather legislate their way to titles than to work harder for them. Yes, I said work harder. It CAN be done!

I SO wish that private schools would just pull out the NIPL and be done with it. Be done with all those discriminatory rules and generate a better product than the IHSA that panders to the whiners and the least common denominator.
All of those may be good points, but would be pretty simple to remedy should their be a split between the schools. Everyone seems to overreact and predict an end of times doomsday scenario when change is proposed but many states have done it managed to continue to have statewide football championships that everyone still celebrates.

And this is no offense to any school you named, but are they really competing for football championships now?
 

ramblinman reborn

Sophomore
Aug 15, 2025
92
110
33
And this is no offense to any school you named, but are they really competing for football championships now?
They aren't, and that's my point.

All the more reason why non-boundaried public schools have been thrown under the bus by their public school brothers.

Non-boundaried public schools are nothing more than pawns and collateral damage in the ongoing war between publics and privates in this state.
 

Kevin JCHS 1981

Sophomore
Jul 2, 2025
150
116
43
1. Put a cap on out-of-district players
2. Restrict the radius to 15mi
3. Private schools may only compete in 5a or higher.
Honestly, I used to have jha618 blocked because he's a little too blindly Ra Ra about ESL (if I'm not confusing my posters). But, IF they had to do something or face a total Public / Private split, this proposal as a starting point would solve several problems that the Privates are never going to solve themselves.
 

jha618

All-Conference
Jan 1, 2018
3,428
4,030
113
They aren't, and that's my point.

All the more reason why non-boundaried public schools have been thrown under the bus by their public school brothers.

Non-boundaried public schools are nothing more than pawns and collateral damage in the ongoing war between publics and privates in this state.
How would they be thrown under the bus? They would either be with the publics and more competitive or with the privates and be the same non factors they are now in terms of competing for football championships.
 

jha618

All-Conference
Jan 1, 2018
3,428
4,030
113
Honestly, I used to have jha618 blocked because he's a little too blindly Ra Ra about ESL (if I'm not confusing my posters). But, IF they had to do something or face a total Public / Private split, this proposal as a starting point would solve several problems that the Privates are never going to solve themselves.
Man if you are blocking people because they are "blindly ra ra" about their favorite team, you should have very few people on here that you aren't blocking.
 

Kevin JCHS 1981

Sophomore
Jul 2, 2025
150
116
43
Man if you are blocking people because they are "blindly ra ra" about their favorite team, you should have very few people on here that you aren't blocking.
LMAO. Okay I cleaned that up a little bit and posted it as "blindly Ra Ra", but there's no reason to start a small War when the biggest point I was making was I agreed with your idea, versus a total split. :ROFLMAO:
 
  • Like
Reactions: jha618

akz68

Junior
Oct 23, 2004
247
251
48
How would they be thrown under the bus? They would either be with the publics and more competitive or with the privates and be the same non factors they are now in terms of competing for football championships.
CPS schools already have different rules when it comes to eligibility for the state playoffs under IHSA such as non-qualifying conferences, so I imagine they would be exempted if this were to come into existence.

I do see this action if executed leading to the NIPL, which does kind of exist in other states in less eloquently alliterative formats as Ramblinman has trademarked as we’ve seen posted in other places.

I don’t know. I love my public-private school playoff games, but I understand both sides on this. I’m just hoping for 3 wins this year now knowing we don’t need 5 lol.
 

Colin2299

Junior
Aug 13, 2025
289
217
43
1. Put a cap on out-of-district players
2. Restrict the radius to 15mi
3. Private schools may only compete in 5a or higher.
1 - Private schools doors would all close down. I bet 50% or more families don’t live in the “district” for their private school.
2 - What does that solve?
3 - how is this a solution? 4a and below is dominated by Lena, Wilmo, Byron and Rochester. Lol

In 5 years this question will be brought up again after the same schools dominate and someone will say make it a 10 mile radius, cap the out of district players lower and let them only play in 7a and up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ramblinman reborn

Colin2299

Junior
Aug 13, 2025
289
217
43
I think that many public school fans and school administrators are knee-jerk in favor of separation, without really having thought things through.

Be careful what you wish for.

IF the decision is to separate, who is included in that separation? Privates and non-boundaried publics? If so, what if one party or the other doesn't like or want that?

If the non-boundaried publics don't go along with it, then what? Is the IHSA really going to force public schools like Payton, Simeon, and Young to compete in a championship division composed primarily of private schools? I always felt like the public school dominated IHSA treated their non-boundaried public school brethren like pawns with its multipliers, success factors, etc. so the IHSA could make it look like it wasn't being biased against faith-based schools. If the IHSA takes non-boundaried publics back in the fold and separates out the private schools, then what are the optics of that? If that happens, how does the IHSA defend their decision to treat non-boundaried public schools like the private schools in the first place?

If private schools don't go along with it, and they reveal the NIPL just for themselves to play with, what about the non-boundaried public schools? Are they still separated out? Do they get welcomed back in with all the other publics? If the former, that's even more ridiculous than including them in the first place along with the privates. If the latter, doesn't that call into question why the non-boundaried schools needed to be lumped in with the private schools in the first place? Not a good look for the IHSA in either case.

Let's assume for a moment that both privates and non-publics get separated and they both go along with it and both decide to remain in the IHSA. In that scenario, what happens to the multiplier and success factor and God knows whatever other discriminatory rules that the whiners called for to water down private school competitiveness vis-a-vis public schools? Do those continue? If so, that's ridiculous. There was some world-class public school whining that took place to enact those rules! Now that those whiners got their way with separation, there is no reason to hold back the private school competitiveness any longer. RIGHT?

I raised this point recently in a different thread, but what happens if private schools stay in the IHSA in a separate championship division? Are non-con games between public and private schools allowed? More to the point, do they COUNT in terms of playoff qualification and seeding?

Lastly, I think the general assumption among public schools and their fans is that private schools would be content to stay in the IHSA and separated into their own class either with them alone or with non-boundaried public schools. Honestly, I would like to think that private schools would show some backbone in a case like that and tell the IHSA to go pound sand where the sun doesn't shine. Why would the private schools want to stay in an athletic association governed and effectively run by public schools and compete for private school championships only? Might as well just start their own athletic association at that point and be free from the path of least resistance and scapegoat seeking whiners who would rather legislate their way to titles than to work harder for them. Yes, I said work harder. It CAN be done!

I SO wish that private schools would just pull out the NIPL and be done with it. Be done with all those discriminatory rules and generate a better product than the IHSA that panders to the whiners and the least common denominator.
Agreed, it would totally blow up in their face.

Publics would have the same teams dominate the same classes every year ( Lena, Wilmo, Byron, Rochester, EST, Batavia, etc).

Privates (with no rules) would openly recruit the best players across the state and provide free top notch education.

Game over
 

4Afan

All-Conference
Sep 15, 2001
3,908
3,501
113
Agreed, it would totally blow up in their face.

Publics would have the same teams dominate the same classes every year ( Lena, Wilmo, Byron, Rochester, EST, Batavia, etc).

Privates (with no rules) would openly recruit the best players across the state and provide free top notch education.

Game over
Free? How does separation in football all of a sudden make private schools free of tuition?
 
Aug 7, 2024
713
467
63
Posted from IHSA board summary


Feel like we've been down this road before...but anyone interested can see who is on committee and what they are looking at.
From what I know population density will truly not hold as much weight as the 30 mile radius to recruit itself! Large population center Private Schools can't be boundary so looking into "population" is moot! Everything else is smoke and mirrors! This will be discussed along with, Private Charter Schools (Warehouses) that spring up by the dozens... some say to circumvent the public boundary that inhibit non-private schools. Some have uttered the sentence: "Let all schools have the 30 mile radius" but what are we without rules but animals... right?! A Caravan buddy said that recruiting non-Catholics has cause problems within the fold. Success without core continuity has damaged some private schools. He and others like him, big contributors to big time Catholic schools, are the ones that will sway this debate. As I have mentioned before, most feel that a "Private" only playoff will be substantially more rewarding than the system we... enjoy... today! Now the ones down the classification ladder will still want successful schools, Rochester, Lena-Winslow and a few more, pushed up or out in the name of balance but this will fail. You can't punish success when its earned, within the rules... that the public schools play and operate under. Over the decades this debate has raged and the time is right to address it once and for all.

I know some will attack this post but being a keyboard warrior and butt hurt about something that is open and honest should make one think and not respond. If the larger private schools are willing to embrace a "Private" only playoff then the SHGs, QNDs of the world should embrace it as well.
 

Colin2299

Junior
Aug 13, 2025
289
217
43
Free? How does separation in football all of a sudden make private schools free of tuition?
IHSA has restrictions on how scholarships are awarded. There are no true athletic scholarships.

Take away the IHSA rules and now privates can operate just like colleges and give out athletic scholarships.
 

Cross Bones

All-Conference
Aug 19, 2001
52,910
3,981
113
IHSA has restrictions on how scholarships are awarded. There are no true athletic scholarships.

Take away the IHSA rules and now privates can operate just like colleges and give out athletic scholarships.
We're told that if they didnt charge tuition the schools would close. Now all of a sudden school would be free 🤔

And im not sure "it could be worse, we'll be able to recruit ALL your players" is the argument you want to make when the discussion is whether or not the playing field is equitable.
 

GhostOfTheGhhost

All-Conference
May 14, 2018
529
1,190
93
CPS schools already have different rules when it comes to eligibility for the state playoffs under IHSA such as non-qualifying conferences, so I imagine they would be exempted if this were to come into existence.

I do see this action if executed leading to the NIPL, which does kind of exist in other states in less eloquently alliterative formats as Ramblinman has trademarked as we’ve seen posted in other places.

I don’t know. I love my public-private school playoff games, but I understand both sides on this. I’m just hoping for 3 wins this year now knowing we don’t need 5 lol.
Selective Enrollment schools like Payton, Young, and Simeon are not remotely in the same class as the CPL schools not eligible for the playoffs. They already can pick and choose any athlete from the city by using the principal discretion exemption from actually testing in academically. In that respect they are no different than private schools. If the IHSA decides on making a change, they should be included as well. These aren't the teams that are playing at 3:30 Thursday or 9am on a Saturday anyway...Now that is CPL football baby!
 

Colin2299

Junior
Aug 13, 2025
289
217
43
We're told that if they didnt charge tuition the schools would close. Now all of a sudden school would be free 🤔

And im not sure "it could be worse, we'll be able to recruit ALL your players" is the argument you want to make when the discussion is whether or not the playing field is equitable.

How is this a debatable argument? You don't think Mt. Carmel, Loyola, Benet, etc... have donors/parents/alumni with deep pockets that would love to give money to directly go towards scholarships for top athletes?

Example: a dad telling a buddy with a stud athlete but not the means to attend Mt. Carmel - I'll pay you're tuition if you go to MC so our kids can play together.

Plus it's a non-profit so it's a tax rightoff.

Not all privates operate the same. The ones that do it right and are well funded will be able to offer athletic scholarships.

They won't recruit all your players. Just the good ones.
 

CCHS-Fan

Senior
Oct 4, 2001
2,035
597
66
1. Put a cap on out-of-district players
2. Restrict the radius to 15mi
3. Private schools may only compete in 5a or higher.
Outside of a small private school in Waukegan, Carmel Catholic is the only private IHSA associate member HS in Lake County. There are CC families scattered about, so the 15mi. restriction would never make sense, IMO.

I know of LEGACY families in Wisconsin sending their kids to CC. No recruiting influence. Exceptional student-athletes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gene K.

Cross Bones

All-Conference
Aug 19, 2001
52,910
3,981
113
How is this a debatable argument? You don't think Mt. Carmel, Loyola, Benet, etc... have donors/parents/alumni with deep pockets that would love to give money to directly go towards scholarships for top athletes?

Example: a dad telling a buddy with a stud athlete but not the means to attend Mt. Carmel - I'll pay you're tuition if you go to MC so our kids can play together.

Plus it's a non-profit so it's a tax rightoff.

Not all privates operate the same. The ones that do it right and are well funded will be able to offer athletic scholarships.

They won't recruit all your players. Just the good ones.
Im pretty sure most of us have a good idea how it works. But isnt this discussion the point, Private schools accumulating talent that isnt anywhere comparable to public schools (in the class theyre in)?

And your response is "if there is a split we will do it more". Youre admitting the thing.
 

mc140

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
8,798
2,852
113
How is this a debatable argument? You don't think Mt. Carmel, Loyola, Benet, etc... have donors/parents/alumni with deep pockets that would love to give money to directly go towards scholarships for top athletes?

Example: a dad telling a buddy with a stud athlete but not the means to attend Mt. Carmel - I'll pay you're tuition if you go to MC so our kids can play together.

Plus it's a non-profit so it's a tax rightoff.

Not all privates operate the same. The ones that do it right and are well funded will be able to offer athletic scholarships.

They won't recruit all your players. Just the good ones.

You really think that doesn't happen already?
 

jha618

All-Conference
Jan 1, 2018
3,428
4,030
113
1 - Private schools doors would all close down. I bet 50% or more families don’t live in the “district” for their private school.
2 - What does that solve?
3 - how is this a solution? 4a and below is dominated by Lena, Wilmo, Byron and Rochester. Lol

In 5 years this question will be brought up again after the same schools dominate and someone will say make it a 10 mile radius, cap the out of district players lower and let them only play in 7a and up.
This is what I mean when I saw people completely overreact and immediately go doomsday when any change is brought up.

1. I never said a number and it would only apply to football players. But if, for example, MC had 35 "out of district" players and the cap was 30, you think MC would have to shutter its doors if they lost 5 students? Come on.

2. If you limit the recruiting resources of a school, it will limit the amount of players they can get. Similar to restricting the amount of scholarships college programs can give out. I feel like this one was pretty straightforward.

3. Were you not around when people lost their minds when Althoff won 1a? IC, Montini (2x), SHG, Chicago Christian, St. Theresa, NCC, JCA have all won championships is 4a or lower recently. And Ive also said several times those public schools you mentioned should be petitioning up.
 

ramblinman reborn

Sophomore
Aug 15, 2025
92
110
33
How would they be thrown under the bus? They would either be with the publics and more competitive or with the privates and be the same non factors they are now in terms of competing for football championships.
They were thrown under the bus years ago when the whining small and medium sized public school IHSA membership demanded that they be lumped in with the private schools to create a "non-boundaried" type of school within the IHSA. They did that without a shred of empirical evidence proving that school type can be directly tied to extraordinary athletic success.

I agree that, by and large, non-boundaried publics are athletic non-factors wherever you want to put them. Regardless, some people want to lump them in with the private schools. They will claim it is because non-boundaried public schools compile their student populations differently and that alone becomes the ipso facto reason for why their schools are not competitive against SOME non-boundaried schools.

I think that is a red herring for the real reason.

I believe the real reason is driven mostly by small town folk from outside the Chicago metro area who find this to be a convenient way to stick it to big city folk. They begrudge the economic and political engine that is Chicago in this state, so they have to get their licks in where and when they can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jha618