Inside Lacrose- D1 teams to improve

bslax91

Sophomore
Sep 15, 2022
95
151
33
Also they did an every team in one sentence and this was Rutgers:

Rutgers
The Knights were pretty young (or at least, inexperienced in a Rutgers uniform) last year and still managed to knock off Maryland, so Cardin Stoller returning as a top-tier goalie plus Colin Kurdyla and JJ Aiello on the offensive end feels like they are still trending upward.
 

Dclax

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2024
2
1
3
From Lacrosse Reference…

Putting it all together, this Rutgers roster looks like one with a fairly high variance band. The offense brings back almost everything and has clear candidates for internal improvement, but it needs those efficiency gains to move from a 33rd‑percentile unit to something more in line with the defense. The defense and faceoff units, which were genuine strengths last year, both have to replace unusually large chunks of proven, high‑end production—Paolatto, Barnard, Mack, and Mendyke are not plug‑and‑play losses. With Stoller back in net and a high‑ceiling transfer in Rainero at the X, there are real paths for Rutgers to keep its upward march going. But there's also more uncertainty than you'd normally expect from a “solid program coming off a solid year,” especially in two phases of the game that carried them last season. How quickly the new faces settle in on defense and how well the faceoff situation stabilizes will probably determine whether this group just holds serve or takes the next step.
 

Degaz-RU

Heisman
Dec 19, 2002
21,762
25,338
88
Hard to believe the season starts in three weeks with an away game at Jacksonville on Saturday January 31.

In the meantime, the boys have scrimmages next Saturday 1/17 at UMass and then the following Saturday 1/24 hosting BU. Hopefully some news will leak out of those scrimmages.
 

Degaz-RU

Heisman
Dec 19, 2002
21,762
25,338
88
From Lacrosse Reference…

Putting it all together, this Rutgers roster looks like one with a fairly high variance band. The offense brings back almost everything and has clear candidates for internal improvement, but it needs those efficiency gains to move from a 33rd‑percentile unit to something more in line with the defense. The defense and faceoff units, which were genuine strengths last year, both have to replace unusually large chunks of proven, high‑end production—Paolatto, Barnard, Mack, and Mendyke are not plug‑and‑play losses. With Stoller back in net and a high‑ceiling transfer in Rainero at the X, there are real paths for Rutgers to keep its upward march going. But there's also more uncertainty than you'd normally expect from a “solid program coming off a solid year,” especially in two phases of the game that carried them last season. How quickly the new faces settle in on defense and how well the faceoff situation stabilizes will probably determine whether this group just holds serve or takes the next step.
Just my feeling, but I think the floor is basically last season’s record, but the ceiling is NCAA if everything clicks with the new OC and we can replace the FOGO and close D guys with adequate replacements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wagram97

richthedentist

All-American
Aug 2, 2001
10,781
8,292
113
Hard to believe the season starts in three weeks with an away game at Jacksonville on Saturday January 31.

In the meantime, the boys have scrimmages next Saturday 1/17 at UMass and then the following Saturday 1/24 hosting BU. Hopefully some news will leak out of those scrimmages.
Yes lacrosse has basically become a winter sport
 
  • Like
Reactions: knightfan2000

Wagram97

Senior
Mar 27, 2023
413
489
63
Just my feeling, but I think the floor is basically last season’s record, but the ceiling is NCAA if everything clicks with the new OC and we can replace the FOGO and close D guys with adequate replacements.
Agree 100%. USA Lacrosse just posted on RU per their countdown of each team for the top 20. RU at #15 and basically was the same as most of us are saying. All about the development of last year's inexperienced team to this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Degaz-RU

bslax91

Sophomore
Sep 15, 2022
95
151
33
(as been said) other than development, I think the biggest question mark is the replacements on D. You figure the offense should only improve with a newer system and everyone having more experience, but the replacements on D are the big ?? McKelvy returns as a starter, and the Dartmouth transfer probably gets another spot, but who mans the third spot and who becomes the first one off the bench. I think that really is the make or break group.
 

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,428
18,734
113
(as been said) other than development, I think the biggest question mark is the replacements on D. You figure the offense should only improve with a newer system and everyone having more experience, but the replacements on D are the big ?? McKelvy returns as a starter, and the Dartmouth transfer probably gets another spot, but who mans the third spot and who becomes the first one off the bench. I think that really is the make or break group.

As I've posted before if Hitchcock stays healthy you have a quality second defensive starter. The question is the 3rd
 
Oct 24, 2007
1,112
620
113
I think the biggest question mark is the replacements on D. - I think we have a big question mark at the Face Off dot as well. We do not have a proven Big Ten commodity here just yet although I am certainly pulling for our underclassmen and transfers to be the guy.