Interesting article on Texas Tech booster Cody Campbell

Dawgg

Heisman
Sep 9, 2012
10,522
10,773
113
fair warning, it’s long…


One thing I didn’t realize is that he’s the guy behind all of these “tell Congress to save women’s and Olympic sports” ads. After reading the article, I finally understand their position (and unsurprisingly it’s not really about women’s and Olympic sports).

Their position is that conferences and schools should no longer be allowed to negotiate individual media deals and that the entirety of the FBS should negotiate as one entity with revenue being distributed more evenly across schools. His claim (which I find doubtful) is that the totality of FBS media rights would be worth billions more annually than all of the current individual conferences’/schools’ contracts combined. Ultimately, what he’s trying to do is take money out of SEC and Big Ten pockets and spread it out across the rest of FBS, which would theoretically boost a school like Texas Tech and make them less dependent on booster money.
 
May 7, 2006
524
81
28
fair warning, it’s long…


One thing I didn’t realize is that he’s the guy behind all of these “tell Congress to save women’s and Olympic sports” ads. After reading the article, I finally understand their position (and unsurprisingly it’s not really about women’s and Olympic sports).

Their position is that conferences and schools should no longer be allowed to negotiate individual media deals and that the entirety of the FBS should negotiate as one entity with revenue being distributed more evenly across schools. His claim (which I find doubtful) is that the totality of FBS media rights would be worth billions more annually than all of the current individual conferences’/schools’ contracts combined. Ultimately, what he’s trying to do is take money out of SEC and Big Ten pockets and spread it out across the rest of FBS, which would theoretically boost a school like Texas Tech and make them less dependent on booster money.
Only if he funds NILs equally.
 

Maroon13

All-Conference
Sep 29, 2022
3,427
3,523
113
A great plan for the Big12 but the sec and B1G will never agree to that.

His best bet is to continue to bank roll TT, win the Big12 every year and get TT in the playoffs.

That seems like an awesome path to relevance for them.
 

OG Goat Holder

Heisman
Sep 30, 2022
11,735
10,874
113
Ultimately, what he’s trying to do is take money out of SEC and Big Ten pockets and spread it out across the rest of FBS, which would theoretically boost a school like Texas Tech and make them less dependent on booster money.
There you have it.

Good news is, even the billionaires are getting tired of funding it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgg

paindonthurt

All-Conference
Apr 7, 2025
3,221
2,370
113
Honestly, we’d be diсked over by his plan since it would ultimately mean less revenue for SEC schools.

“Poor Ole State” is still in the top 25% in the FBS and top 10% in Division I when it comes to revenue.
Everyone gets dicked over in communism/socialism!
 
  • Like
Reactions: jethreauxdawg

Dawgg

Heisman
Sep 9, 2012
10,522
10,773
113
A great plan for the Big12 but the sec and B1G will never agree to that.

His best bet is to continue to bank roll TT, win the Big12 every year and get TT in the playoffs.

That seems like an awesome path to relevance for them.
That’s why he’s petitioning Congress. His intention is a change to the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maroon13

Jeffreauxdawg

All-American
Dec 15, 2017
8,732
7,440
113
I think equal revenue sharing in FBS is great. The FBS should be about 94 teams made up of everyone currently in FBS except the SEC, Big 10, and the upper half of the ACC (including Notre Dame.)



Those 42 teams should make up the FPS or Football Power Subdivision. The FPS would be subject to collective bargaining requiring players to be subject to 1 transfer, eligible for only 4 seasons total in FPS and no more than 2 at lower divisions and no players can play after age 24.

Divide into 3 conferences where 3 teams are AQ for playoffs from each conference and 3 wild cards from anywhere. The 3 conference winners and next highest ranked team get first round byes. The bottom 2 teams from the FPS get relegated to FBS every year. The FBS tournament champion and regular season highest (or 2nd highest) ranked team get promoted.

The FPS would give the NFL a run for their money on tv rights.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldVideoGuy

OldVideoGuy

Redshirt
Jun 25, 2021
60
45
18
fair warning, it’s long…


One thing I didn’t realize is that he’s the guy behind all of these “tell Congress to save women’s and Olympic sports” ads. After reading the article, I finally understand their position (and unsurprisingly it’s not really about women’s and Olympic sports).

Their position is that conferences and schools should no longer be allowed to negotiate individual media deals and that the entirety of the FBS should negotiate as one entity with revenue being distributed more evenly across schools. His claim (which I find doubtful) is that the totality of FBS media rights would be worth billions more annually than all of the current individual conferences’/schools’ contracts combined. Ultimately, what he’s trying to do is take money out of SEC and Big Ten pockets and spread it out across the rest of FBS, which would theoretically boost a school like Texas Tech and make them less dependent on booster money.
If I saw it right, the commercial shows that the SEC endorsed (in the fine print at the end) the bill.
 

Duke Humphrey

All-Conference
Oct 3, 2013
2,610
1,664
113
If I saw it right, the commercial shows that the SEC endorsed (in the fine print at the end) the bill.
There are dueling commercials. Campbell’s, which seeks to update the 1961 Sports Broadcast Act, and then the ad that is for the the Score Act, which essentially codifies most of the House Settlement and is endorsed by the P4 leagues. SEC is for the Score Act, not Campbell
 

Dawgg

Heisman
Sep 9, 2012
10,522
10,773
113
One other thing I picked out from the article is that Campbell started out as a message board troll, so there’s hope for all of us!***
 

olblue

All-Conference
Aug 17, 2011
3,385
1,648
113
Honestly, we’d be diсked over by his plan since it would ultimately mean less revenue for SEC schools.

“Poor Ole State” is still in the top 25% in the FBS and top 10% in Division I when it comes to revenue.
What if the billionaire was right and it generated more revenue resulting in MSU’s piece of the pie being bigger?
 

olblue

All-Conference
Aug 17, 2011
3,385
1,648
113
Everyone gets dicked over in communism/socialism!
Penguin Glasses GIF by Pudgy Penguins
 

Dawgg

Heisman
Sep 9, 2012
10,522
10,773
113
What if the billionaire was right and it generated more revenue resulting in MSU’s piece of the pie being bigger?
I mean… maybe? I feel like the disparity between the Big Ten and SEC media payouts ($50-$60 Million) vs, say, Conference USA or the MAC ($1-$2 Million), is too wide for the Big Ten and SEC to escape a hit.

Multiplying $60 Million times 136 is $8.16 Billion. Color me doubtful that the money is out there.

Just rough math, annually, the conferences currently make in their media deals:
Big Ten - $1 Billion
SEC - $800 Million
Big 12 - $400 Million
ACC - $500 Million
American - $80 Million
MWC - $45 Million
MAC - $10 Million
Sun Belt - $7 Million
Pac-12 - $80 Million
Conference USA - $5 Million

So, total, that’s just short of $3 Billion per year, meaning for all teams in the FBS to make as much as Big Ten/SEC teams without Big Ten and SEC teams getting a haircut, the total media payout would have to be $5 Billion more than it is today.

Again, color me doubtful.
 

DT4248

Senior
Apr 22, 2025
462
609
93
Everyone gets dicked over in communism/socialism!
Everyone gets dicked over in capitalism too. Everyone except the elites get dicked over in every economic system eventually that humans have tried in history. Having a hard-on for hating the system and not the players is missing the forrest for a tree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgg