Toggle sidebar

Interesting...

P

Piscis

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2001
25,876
3,453
113
It looks like the averages are pretty spot on when you think about the public perception of the football programs. Historically, we are equals with Baylor, Cal, Duke, Illinois, Minnesota, MSSt, Purdue, Rutgers, SMU and UVA.
 
K

kidrobinski

All-Conference
Jul 27, 2004
1,513
1,346
113
Why not us? Because we’re not a blue blood that’s why; the list speaks volumes, yes.

Legacy, cool points with peers, favoritism from officials and conferences, and now donors; that’s a tough hill to climb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gamecock stock
G

gamecock stock

All-Conference
Jan 21, 2022
3,693
3,331
113
I count 11 schools that average more than 2 wins over us. I thought there would have been more. So, I'm pleasantly surprised.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kidrobinski
Lurker123

Lurker123

All-American
May 4, 2020
7,051
5,787
113
Gamecock Jacque said:
Teams AVERAGE conference championships? That can't be.
Click to expand...

No, not average championships, but the additional bowl games and championships could be why the other teams have more games per season over time.

I also assumed there was some questionable rounding going on, to give some teams only 10 games a year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nlstanford
G

Gamecock Jacque

Joined Dec 20, 2020
Jan 30, 2022
5,777
5,310
113
Lurker123 said:
No, not average championships, but the additional bowl games and championships could be why the other teams have more games per season over time.

I also assumed there was some questionable rounding going on, to give some teams only 10 games a year.
Click to expand...
I assume, like most of these things, it's meaningless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3USC1801 and Lurker123
Uscg1984

Uscg1984

All-Conference
Mar 9, 2006
2,732
3,557
113
Also, pre-1950 or so, there was a lot of variance in the number of games each team played each season. SC wasn't regularly playing 10+ games a year until around the middle of the 20th Century. I'm sure some programs were playing that many games every season a lot earlier.
 
P

Piscis

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2001
25,876
3,453
113
Uscg1984 said:
Also, pre-1950 or so, there was a lot of variance in the number of games each team played each season. SC wasn't regularly playing 10+ games a year until around the middle of the 20th Century. I'm sure some programs were playing that many games every season a lot earlier.
Click to expand...
In 1955, SC played 9 games. In 1965, SC played 10 games. 11 game schedules didn't really become the norm until around 1970. From 1925 until 1970, football seasons were generally 8 to 10 games.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
GamecockCentral

Latest

  1. 01 GamecockCentral Football Breaking down South Carolina's turnover problem
  2. 02 GamecockCentral Football Shane Beamer shares update on transfer kicker Ethan Sanchez: 'It doesn't seem promising'
  3. 03 GamecockCentral Football Shane Beamer talks slow start for Nyck Harbor in senior season at South Carolina
  4. 04 GamecockCentral Football How South Carolina's offense stacks up statistically with the rest of the SEC
  5. 05 GamecockCentral Football South Carolina EDGE Dylan Stewart returns to practice
Top Bottom