The above post is a jumble of gobbledygook. It does not make English sense, much less rhetorical sense. Try again, TJ.
Is Mitch a vegetable?
- Thread starter Huey Grey 2
- Start date
The above post is a jumble of gobbledygook. It does not make English sense, much less rhetorical sense. Try again, TJ.
Probably fraud and/or treason, but it would take Congress to apply the pressure for there to be a trial, and a public more or less in agreement that the act wasn't justified.
No matter what, Trump would probably just pardon the principles and set the whole thing ablaze knowing he won't be held accountable because there are still enough loyal voters and lawmakers to legally stop him.
But, Im a rule break that is just speculating
Last edited:
I might not like it, but I would have to understand the logic behind it, because it has come out only in response to a continued campaign of silence and stonewalling by Ol' Turtlehead's family and staff.
Fair enough. The video was shot at the time of the incident, before his family and staff even had an opportunity to begin stonewalling. So let’s take the media distribution component out of the equation and focus on just the recording.
What would you think if your spouse was being loaded into an ambulance in the throes of a life-or-death medical emergency and you looked over and saw your neighbor shooting cell phone video?
The hypothesis I’m disputing is that she fled to China specifically so that no one would be available to authorize the doctors to take him off life support.
My contention is that geography doesn’t enter into it. If she doesn’t want him removed from life support then she can refuse to sign the directive while she’s sitting in a chair next to his hospital bed. There was no need for her to leave the country to accomplish that objective. So it makes no sense to say she left the country in order to accomplish that objective.
I understand that, but it seems to me (and most other people as well, I believe) that she shouldn't have left his side, much less the country, in the first place.
You sure are defensive for supposedly not taking the position we all saw you take. Probably best to just concede and move along. You're not helping yourself.
You're not going to TJ me. Sorry.
Your comments made it seem like it wasn't that big of a deal she left her dying husband to go "handle some family business" in China. Not like she was just across town.
Multiple people in this thread, also read into your comments that way. As Jerome said, why does this keep happening all the time? Have a good one!!
That’s why she is in China. He is dead. She was told to keep it quiet. She went to China to avoid having to answer questions. Simple.
Edit: I see she’s back. Nevermind.
Lol. You chose to engage in this discussion. Don’t act like it’s something that happened to you.
“Made it seem.” So even though I made it crystal clear numerous times that I don’t support or condone her actions, you went ahead and decided that I support her actions. That’s the core problem with this board in a nutshell.
“Not all marriages are created equal” is not expression of support for her actions. It’s a statement of fact. Multiple people declared they would never leave their spouse’s bedside and wondered why she would so such a thing. So I explained why. None of us are part of a Washington power couple. None of our spouses are a prominent senator. Elaine’s husband is. None of us have multimillion dollar business and philanthropic endeavors in China. Elaine and her family do. She lives in a different world than we do.
I don’t support what she did. At no time have I ever said I support her going to China. I simply explained to you why she did it. Because it sure as hell wasn’t for the purpose of blocking the doctors from removing Mitch’s life support. She can easily do that without boarding an airplane.
To Jerome’s point, it’s not “weird” at all that it keeps happening. It’s actually quite predictable. Expected, really. It keeps happening because no one on this board is interested in having a grownup discussion about anything.
By that I mean actually reading the words that another poster writes. Interpreting those words the way they were intended to be interpreted. Paying attention and acknowledging when someone repeatedly clarifies any misconceptions about their point. And then responding accordingly and intelligently.
The only lib poster I can think of who actually does those things is @What Would Jesus Do? . There are probably a couple others that I’m forgetting, but none of them are participating in this thread.
Nobody wants to do that because it’s boring. It’s more fun to make fart noises and shoot spitwads to make the rest of the class laugh.
That’s why guys like Lucas like to accuse me of changing the subject when I respond directly to something that someone else already posted.
It’s why Torbee accused me of “both sidesing” in a post that’s not even in the same realm as a “both sides” argument. It’s why he spent two hours repeatedly accusing me of constantly doing the “both sides dance” but couldn’t spend 30 seconds coming up with a single example to back up his accusation. He can’t because there are no examples and he knows there are no examples. But he continues to make the accusation anyway because he also knows he can rely on 10 or 15 of his buddies to join in and regurgitate hackneyed phrases like “TJ gonna TJ”.
Those guys made a choice to be a dick. It’s not even a little bit surprising because they do it all they time.
It’s why 8 pages into this thread, even after I have repeatedly stated that I don’t support Elaine’s actions, there are posters still accusing me of supporting Elaine’s actions. I could declare 20 more times that I don’t support her and the same dumbasses will still be accusing of supporting her. Because they’re choosing to be a dick.
That’s just the way this board operates. And it’s sure as hell not my fault.
If he’s alive, what do they have to gain by not announcing it? It doesn’t make any sense. He’s got to be dead.
I'm inclined to believe this photo, but it would not shock me if it was a fake, either. It would have been better if he had held up a copy of today's newspaper, but if he has survived and his wife is with him, then good for him, I guess. You just have to wonder what his state of mental cognition is, and why he just doesn't resign NOW. He has already announced that he's no longer running.
What would be really great is if he held up a sign that said "Eat shiat, Laura Loomer."
I don’t trust any photo in this era of AI and Photoshop. I’ll believe he’s alive when I see him interviewed by a legitimate news source.
It's a legit photo. I also think it's legitimately insane that he thinks he's able to finish out his term.
