Petrino 2.0 was 29-14 until a clown took over the department. Other inexplicable **** followed.
And our football finances were rockin’ right up to that point, not to return again. We’re clawing our way back with Brohm.
Jurich managed the department like someone competent was always gonna be in charge of athletics. I’m willing to admit—he might as well—that was a big mistake on his part.
The tired argument about Petrino’s buyout has been debunked. Repeatedly. It wasn’t a buyout to scare off another school. No one was after him when Arkansas put $18 freaking million in his contract. And who the f_k was after Payne when clowns put $10 million in his?
As usual, you do your half a$$ed analysis and HOPE no one has any facts to blow it up…
Lol - where exactly have you posted any facts? Let’s sum up what you’ve said.
1. Petrino was 29-14 until Jurich was relieved of his duties on 9/27/17. Somehow having a new AD caused him to immediately begin losing - going 7-12 in his next 19 games. Where’s your factual causation evidence that the new AD caused this? Or are we just filing this under more of your “I’m not a big believer in coincidences” line of subjective nonsense?
2. Football (as well as other revenue sports) finances will indeed take a hit if the team’s winning percentage falls to .368 as - from a factual standpoint - fans don’t support a loser in equal numbers that they do a winner. Again - you’ve brought nothing factual - only your agenda driven supposition - that would suggest that the new AD was responsible.
3. Your claim of how Jurich “ran the department” is simply more subjective projection - you weren’t part of any of that - so you’re guessing. You might be right - you might not. Facts don’t contain those variables.
4. Arkansas had just hired him away from the Falcons - and included that buyout before all of the blowback happened over Petrino’s chickenshit way of informing the team by leaving a note in the players’ lockers - making him a pariah in the nfl. He wasn’t yet a pariah in CFB - but he hit that status with his “motorcycle crash”. You’ve posted nothing factual about his second UofL contract - instead making a straw man argument about Payne’s contract.
You make no comment about Petrino’s documented history of tanking programs 3-4 years into his tenure, nothing about not knowing that Strong followed kragthorpe (not the other way around) and, zero evidence about your goofy assertion that somehow the AD is responsible for the baseball team underperforming the last few years.
So tell me again - where are your “facts” again that have blown up my “half assed analysis”?